User talk:Vizu/Archive 1

Цвет сканированных марок

Здравствуйте, Виктор! Марки какие-то тусклые получаются. Может в Фотошопе немного улучшите перед заливкой их на склад? А то моя версия файла была аккуратнее, хоть и меньшего размера. Т.е. где белый цвет - он должен быть белым, а не серым. См. Image:USSR block EXPO-89.jpg. Мою версию уже кто-то удалил.--Mariluna 08:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

И вам тоже здравствуйте! Ну марка выглядит именно так. У неё такой натуральный цвет (никаким воздействиям не подвергалась). Почему надо выбелять. Да и фотошопа у меня нет на домашнем компьютере.ю--Vizu 17:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Перенесла марочный лист с рувики сюда. Image:Stamp of Russia 1998 Pushkin's pictures.jpg. --Mariluna 10:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Спасибо!--Vizu 18:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Templates

Please do not remove the templates "removeborder" and "rotate" from Image:Artillery USSR Postletter 1942 reverse.jpg and Image:Artillery USSR Postletter 1942 averse.jpg ! They are there for a good reason ! - Erik Baas 00:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Перевод: Пжлста, не удаляйте шаблоны "removeborder" и "rotate" из изображений Image:Artillery USSR Postletter 1942 reverse.jpg и Image:Artillery USSR Postletter 1942 averse.jpg! Они там по хорошей причине! --Michael Romanov 23:40, 26 December 2007

• Thank you! Спасибочки за перевод, а что это за шаблончеги-то, Михаил? Ни бум-бум//--Vizu 00:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Дословно: "убери рамку" и "вращай". Товарищу не понравилась твоя черная рамка и то, что у тебя правый край где-то на полградуса вниз завалился. Вот он и советует убрать эту черную рамку и вращением имиджа выравнять верхнюю и нижнюю стороны изображения параллельно горизонту. --Michael Romanov 00:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Ага. Спасибо. У меня фотошоп вообще не стоит. Открытки не ровные, а выгнутые. Полградуса никак не поймаю. Я и так пересканивал пару раз, лучше не получится--Vizu 00:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Artillery USSR Postletter 1942 averse.jpg

Hi, Why did you want Image:Artillery USSR Postletter 1942 averse.jpg deleted? I have taken the template off it as there was no reason. Please feel free to add it again if you have a reason. Please follow the steps on the template so it can be processed. Thank you. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

• Hello! Exuse me, I have not Photoshop--Vizu 15:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

That's OK - someone else can take the border off the image? -- Deadstar (msg) 15:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Deadstar обратился ко мне с просьбой о помощи. Вы не могли бы объяснить причину удаления этого изображения? Спасибо. --EugeneZelenko 15:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Потому что это дубль. См. Image:Postcard 1942 Artillery USSR b.jpg. К тому же голландцу Эрику Баасу страшно рамка не понравилась, ну удалил. И не постлеттер, а посткард.--Vizu 15:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I have marked the image as a duplicate. Kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 16:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:20CSD_Coin_Tesla.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:20CSD_Coin_Tesla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

- Rocket000 00:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

История и лицензия

Добрый день. я нашёл такое изовражение. Image:Stalin stamp.JPG. Мне интересно не знаете ли Вы проишождение этой марки. Зарaнее - cпасибо--Jaro.p 16:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

• Привет, знаю. Это пропагандистская антисемитская немецкая марка, выпущенная для Великобритании, где британская корона и Сталин с еврейским носом. Их с самолёта сбрасывали. Почитай статьи рувики ru:Пропагандистская филателия и ru:Военно-пропагандистская филателия--Vizu 16:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Тфу ты наверное лицензия указана не верно?--Jaro.p 17:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Это работа Германского министерства пропаганды, т.е. правительства. Теперь верно.--Vizu 17:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

---

Спасибо за ваш вклад! Ваше изображение или иной контент был только что удалён, или скоро будет удалён, в соответствии с нашими механизмами работы и правилами, потому что он не соответствовал - или не соответствует - нашим целям. Пожалуйста, обязательно просмотрите описание задач проекта; если вкратце, Викисклад предназначен для образовательных медиафайлов, таких, как фотографии, диаграммы, анимация, музыка, зачитанные тексты и видеоклипы. Прилагательное “образовательный” следует понимать в широком смысле: “предоставляющий знания; обучающий или информативный”. Викисклад не содержит текстовых статей наподобие энциклопедических, а также учебников, новостей, словарных определений и всего такого. Для всех этих видов контента есть отдельные проекты: Википедия, Викиучебник, Викитека, Викиновости, Викисловарь и Викицитатник. Если контент кажется соответствующим целям одного из этих, других проектов, пожалуйста, постарайтесь вносить его там. Если вы думаете, что удаление было произведено по ошибке, и вклад соответствует целям проекта, вы можете обратиться насчет этого на страницу Commons:Undeletion requests, объяснив причину, по которой вклад соответствует целям, чтобы помочь другим оценить данный запрос. Спасибо за понимание.

 

abf /talk to me/ 11:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Licensing:

You removed nsd-templates and put licenses, but you are not author of images, that's why you don't know licenses.--Ahonc (talk) 13:06, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

• Добрый день. 1. Я соавтор (мы вместе фотографировали), но поскольку двоих указать автором нельзя, указан Евгений. Он сейчас в вики-отпуске. 2. Если посмотреть на историю правок, то изначально лицензии на всех фото были - как сейчас. Я их при оформлении стёр по ошибке (категории стояли выше, чем лицензия; стёр не указанный автор, а я). Сейчас восстановил. 3. Как Евгений появится, он мне пришлёт ОТРС-разрешение на размещение и лицензирование своих фотографий, а я его размещу на личной странице. С уважением, --Vizu 13:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Upload form

Do you speak English? Could you please translate this text

If you already have an {{Information}} template or similar template ready to copy/paste, use the basic upload form. To always use the old basic form layout, check "DISABLED:Use the old-style upload form layout. [talk] " on the "Gadgets" tab of your preferences.

into Russian? I'll then add it to the new Russian upload form. I guess it'll help avoid problems like this. Cheers, Lupo 13:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I don not speak English language. Idiots new shablon Upload form. Hallo! --Vizu 13:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, just go to Настройки, "Гаджеты", select "Использовать старую форму загрузки". Lupo 13:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! --Vizu 13:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Dupe tagging

Please check how to properly tag dupes: {{dupe|Other image.ext}}. Nothing more, nothing less. You previous at least 4 tags were incorrect and required manual cleanup. Thanks. Siebrand 17:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, can I translate this for a non-English speaking user? Витя, тебя попросили при выставлении дупликатов на удаление использовать простой шаблон {{dupe|Название правильного файла, оставляемого вместо удаляемого}}. Пройдись по своим файлам на удаление (как минимум, их 4) и проставь везде этот шаблон. --Michael Romanov 20:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Не совсем так: его попросили правильно использовать этот шаблон.--Ahonc (talk) 22:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tweed-Boss-LOC.jpg

А зачем надо было перезагружать Image:Tweed-Boss-LOC.jpg? --Gruznov (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Это получше качеством. --Vizu (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kharkov 1981 Vedmedik.jpg

Я ещё и такое залил. Описание, наверно, надо уточнить, я уже плохо помню Харьков. --Л.П. Джепко (talk) 08:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

У меня еще есть несколько слайдов 1981 года, где то ли Харьков, то ли Киев, то ли Белгород. Постараюсь залить в ближайшее время. Я тогда купил "Зенит" и учился снимать на "Орвохроме", вот и снимал что ни попадя. --Л.П. Джепко (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Это не Сумская - это площадь Советской Украины. Кадр отличный - кусочек истории. Орвохром была пленкой номер один советского времени, как щас помню. --Michael Romanov (talk) 08:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Великолепно! А ещё есть? Надо все выложить. Это такая редкость - старые фотографии со спокойной свободной лицензией. Как жалею, что в армии не фотографировал на цветную плёнку. Куча мелких любительских слайдов, не знаю, как их цифровать. --Vizu (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Витя, есть исчо. :) А вот эту кассу приходилось брать приступом многократно, с потерями пуговиц на верхней одежде. А однажды зимой в приезд каких-то советских суперзнаменитосей даже шарф потерял - затоптали в толпе. Эх, было времячко!.. Название фильма, кстати, хорошо читается. Спасибо, Лёня, за ностальгические фото. :) --Michael Romanov (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Слайды цифровать очень легко, если есть HP сканер со специальной встроенной рамкой для слайдов/негативов. Я брал такой у свата на месяц и оцифровал все свои слайды (около 2 тысяч, но большей частью семейные фото или некачественные). Буду по настроению заливать. Витя, извини, я запарил твою просьбу насчет училища, ответил у себя. --Leonid Dzhepko (talk) 12:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Не видел такой штучки. А негативы можно цифровать? --Vizu (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year and Merry Christmas! Оприходовано. --Michael Romanov (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hello!

Это не моя работа - это казачье творение:) Извини, если что не так, но нужно было проиллюстрировать. Stanitsa 14:49, 20 NOV 2008 (UTC)

File:GolovanovOriginalCoverStamp.jpg

File:GolovanovOriginalCoverStamp.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Alex Spade (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Добрый вечер! Вроде бы же пришли к мнению, что, раз согласно правилу Всемирного почтового союза, подписанному и СССР, и Россией потом в 1992 году, вся почтовая карточка (конверт) с напечатанной (не наклеенной) маркой является официальным государственным знаком почтовой оплаты (там нигде не говорится про марку, только про карточку/конверт), то изображение её лицевой стороны является знаком почтовой оплаты. С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 16:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

"пришли к мнению" - Где? Впервые слышу такой коммент от участника ВП:П:Фил. Alex Spade (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Когда-то высказывалось такое мнение. --Vizu (talk) 00:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Это мне+вам=нам мало поможет. Нужны, если не ссылки на соот. обсуждение, по тогда ссылки на соот. доки. Alex Spade (talk) 10:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Фото Дениса Маркова

Письмо уже есть в OTRS. Ticket#: 2009070110042763 --Butko (talk) 14:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

• Спасибо. --Vizu (talk) 15:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Bronepoezd Ed Rossia.jpg

То, что фото негативное — это потому, что оно агитационное? :) --IGW (talk) 20:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

• Фото негативное - потому что оригинал. Именно так оно помещено в журнале (это не фотошоп или программы преобразования позитива в негатив). --Vizu (talk) 13:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Понятно. Такой художественный прием не часто встречается. Может быть имеет смысл упомянуть об этом в описании или категорию какую поставить? --IGW (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
    • Упомяните, пожалуйста. И в той же категории имеются позитивы того же фото, даже два, при этом больше по размеру. Негатив был помещён в историческом журнале "Родина" на 1 странице, позитив - в том же журнале, в гораздо меньшем размере, страниц через сто. --Vizu (talk) 14:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
      • Поправил описание, добавил категорию. --IGW (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Kamaz vehicles

Hello! Stop adding Category:Kamaz vehicles to this image. Just because there is a Kamaz truck standing around in the background, a categorization in in the Kamaz vehicles-category is not justified. For more information read: COM:OVERCAT. --High Contrast (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

• Let it be).. --Vizu (talk) 13:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your cooperation. --High Contrast (talk) 21:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Личный конвой Мая пляшет лезгинку 1919.jpg

Здравствуйте! Добавленные категории - красные, их еще создать надо бы... Rubin16 (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

• Естественно. Кто знает английский, пусть создаёт. Особенно тот, кто знает, как "Дроздовцы" по-английски. --Vizu (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Afgan1987 2Mi8MTBarakiVVP.jpg

Привет. Хотел спросить, зачем ты откатил эту фотографию к версии где некрасивая фиолетовая рамка? Pianist (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

• Это её оригинальный вид. Черно-белая - это черно-белое сканирование. --Vizu (talk) 05:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Mapa_from_Ukraine_postcard_1919.jpg

File:Mapa_from_Ukraine_postcard_1919.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

• по-русски нельзя? --Vizu (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Chestnuts

Добрый день. Обращаю ваше внимание, что Chestnuts - это ru:каштан посевной (он же каштан благородный), Castanea sativa, а ru:конский каштан обыкновенный, Aesculus hippocastanum - совсем другой вид, из другого рода и даже другого семейства, поэтому у файле не могут быть одновременно категории Chestnuts и Aesculus hippocastanum. --Bff (talk) 09:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

• Спасибо, просто я не ботаник) --Vizu (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Пам.Шевченко Знаменосец спереди.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пам.Шевченко Знаменосец спереди.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive ! --Jebulon 22:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пушкинская 69 Пушкин граффити.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. FP ?--Jebulon 14:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Size and only overexposed

Yes I admit, the size wasn't everywhere good reason. But I think You haven't read the COM:I. Yes I think this image has overexposure. look. I thought You're from Ukraine (UA vehicle registration plate). But for me it's relevant. I just look at the picture and I see not so good Quality, and the most overexposed sky. JDavid (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you. --Vizu (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

  Not only Russians. Here is Italian File:Erinaceus europaeus (head).jpg. So which oblast? You welcome. JDavid (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

  Kharkov oblast. --Vizu (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

May cat (your image nominated for QI)

May I ask you, what is a "May cat"? Does it have something to do with the month May? Is that something specifically Russian? In France, for instance, one talks about a "poisson d'Avril" in connection with a specific custom. "Poisson d'Avril" means "fish of April" in English, but I think nobody would understand this outside France. Is there a similar reason why I do not understand the "May cat" or did I get anything else wrong? --JRff (talk) 17:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry. I don't know English language. May = month. "Cat of May". "Cat of March" = Tomcat). --Vizu (talk) 17:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, it's simply a picture of a cat taken in May. ;) The picture date is 10 May 2010. There is an idiom in Russian, 'March cats', meaning cats that caterwall (yell) in March because of reproduction season. Here is the tomcat in May, after his reproduction season is done. :) --Michael Romanov (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

OK. So one should probably not write "May cat" in encyclopedic context, especially when the image is nominated for QI ;-) Best would be the name of the specific breed of cats. But I am not an expert on cats and cannot make a suggestion. Perhaps we should just take "a grey cat seen at Kharkov City, Ukraine". --JRff (talk) 18:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

We do not know the breed name but will ask a specialist in felinology and inform you. --Michael Romanov (talk) 19:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! --Vizu (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Didn't know that such a thing as felinology exists :-) :-) --JRff (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

This cat is the Siberian male cat. --Vizu (talk) 15:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem!

[1] [2] :-) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Good evening too !

The soviet coat of arms ? I like it (the picture, not the symbol at all, sorry, maybe) ! It was a shame nobody could/would improve it. Do you think it is better now ? Do you know how to do perspective correction ? it is very easy with "the GIMP", I may explain or help you in bad english next time if you want.--Jebulon (talk) 22:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you. My English language is very bad. I do not know to a perspective correction, excuse me. --Vizu (talk) 22:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
  • No problem. Happy to support. My russian (or ukrainian) is near zero ! Let's speak with photos !--Jebulon (talk) 22:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
    • ) My English is not zero, but 0,05 ) Your Russian isnt zero too, but you know: perestroika, sputnik, vodka, seledka, samovar, caviar, medved(ev), Kreml, Gorbi, KGB and others popular Russian klukva)) --Vizu (talk) 22:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Харьковский мост скульптура2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Балабановка овраг VizuIMG 4290.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 00:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Пам.Шевченко Красногвардеец крупно.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пам.Шевченко Красногвардеец крупно.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Mattbuck 21:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! May cat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Трам на Благбазе Пискуновский.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Mattbuck 00:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Харьковский мост скульптура1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment As there was obviously fog on that day and the non-overexposed sky on the other image of the same subject here does not look much different, this is one of the rare cases were overexposure did no harm. Also I do not understand the size argument. The image has more than 7 MP. The reason why we can only decline here is perspective and framing. The crop at the right is so tight that there is not enough space left for the necessary corrections of tilt or perspective.--Johannes Robalotoff 16:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)  Done--Vizu 16:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC) OK then. Mattbuck 14:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Папа Гуйе граффити Харьков.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a crop left, IMO. But I'll support if done. I add a french description in the file page.--Jebulon 20:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC) :* Done File cropped. Thanks for a french description.--Vizu 17:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC). Better now, thank you.--Jebulon 21:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Песочин ТЭЦ5 Градирни VizuIMG 2181.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Unsharp areas and the telegraph pole really spoil this. Mattbuck 01:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC) :*There was the only spot available for taking this picture over the river, so it's impossible to avoid the telegraph pole.--Vizu 15:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)  Support after my corrections --Carschten 12:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пам.Дедки Данилевского12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe background is a bit dark, but it's not too bad. However, the image needs to be cropped, the edges are not straight. --MichaelBueker 15:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC) *  Done--Vizu 16:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Good enough for me.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney and two hiperboloide cooling towers on Kharkov-CN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good... please, add geolocation. --Cayambe 10:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC) * Done--Vizu 15:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lyuk tel.MS1946Chernysh.1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 06:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Журавлевский источник.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Please, geocode. --Cayambe 08:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)