Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wikicontributeur!

File:Logo-bonduelle.JPG edit

 
File:Logo-bonduelle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Je cherche un modèle edit

Bonjour je viens d'importer une image en .svg et je souhaite placer l'équivalent du {{SI}} ou {{supression immédiate | lien vers la vouvelle image}} sur l'ancienne image qui est en bitmap pour avertir ceux qui font la maintenance. Quelle est l'équivalent sur commons ? Par avance merci.--Wikicontributeur (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, Le modèle équivalent est Speedydelete. Mais pour un cas de remplacement, il me semble que la politique de suppression de Commons demande de procéder par une demande de suppression ordinaire. Entretemps, il est possible d'insérer le modèle Vector version available. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Complément [1] {{Vector version available |1=File:RTL logo.svg }}.

File:Europe 1 simple logo.png edit

Wikicontributeur, before tagging files for Speedy deletion again, please read and follow the Criteria for Speedy deletion. The file File:Europe 1 simple logo.png is a simplified version of File:Europe 1.svg without the degradation (that is the only edition of the file; the rest is intact). Also, I moved File:Europe 1.svg to Commons because the logo is clearly bellow the Treshold of originality, and therefore is in the Public domain. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reverting me edit

You reverted me in the images File:Tourteau fromager découpé.jpg and File:Tourteau fromager entier.jpg: I made an administrative decission. You don't have the right to undo my revision! You did not gave a cause for your request. So it is impossible to rename the images. Give a valid cause and we will see. If you undo again an administrative action you have to be reported because of vandalism. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Marcus Cyron Je n'aime pas beaucoup votre façon de procéder, en proférant des menaces déplacée, ce n'est une méthode ! Regardez ces diff. ici et ici sur les deux fichiers la justification y est présent, comme lors de la première fois, encore faut t-il prendre la peine de la lire. Il y a une faute d'orthographe : fromager > fromagé. A présent merci de faire la correction. Je vous laisse exécuter.--Wikicontributeur (talk) 15:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:NTV 1996 logo.svg edit

 
File:NTV 1996 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fenerli1978 (talk) 02:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:A suivre 1978 logo.png edit

 
File:A suivre 1978 logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.43.161.12 19:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply