Claritas

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Boise State MSS 122 2 crop.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boise State MSS 122 2 crop.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

A fresh star Barnstar for you!

		The Commons Barnstar
		For an excellent fresh start on Commons in the image review circuitry. It appears you have had your fights elsewhere with the wiki community. I have no idea what that was about, and I don't care either. On Commons I only see new interesting contributions and nominations, careful image assessments and insightful comments. Moreover, you are not afraid to also partake in the less prestiguous chores of image nomination closure etc. Keep up the good work! --Slaunger (talk) 21:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

en

En --С уважением, sav 21:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your vote

Hi Claritas, I believe you should change your oppose reason for this nomination because the image has a lot of educational value as Dr. Andrew Young from San Diego University explained. Here's his discretion of the image:

"What a lot of beautiful effects are illustrated here! Images formed by reflection; both real and virtual images formed by refraction; and some fine examples of the contact angle where the droplets meet the plant surface. In some places, the plant cuticle is waxy, and the contact angle is near 90 degrees; in other places, the water wets the surface, and the contact angle is small. The picture is a real museum of physics, in addition to being a beautiful image. Thanks!"

So I hope after reading the commentary made by a person who knows what he's talking about you'd agree your "limited educational value" sounds kind of funny. Cheers.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

For photographs of flowers, I always like to know the species of each one shown. I can think of many better ways of demonstrating these optical phenomena, so the content is not featurable imo on that. Relatively low resolution too. --Claritas (talk) 07:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jacobus Koelman.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jacobus Koelman.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

The work

Appreciated - puppet account actually from a while back - must be slacking - should have realised it quicker. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

No problem. --Claritas (talk) 10:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Huracan 1973 file

Hello, Claritas. You have new messages at Fma12's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone Urn, Trent Park, Enfield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some chromatic aberration in the trees at left to be corrected--Jebulon 12:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC) - Attempted correction using script - much less prominent now. --Claritas 16:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)Thanks. Not perfect, but better now. QI--Jebulon 18:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, thanks for reviewing my image and promoting it as a QI, if you don't mind can you please review this Lakhota Museum Jamnagar, I covered that museum as a part of GLAM activity carried out single handed. Thanks. Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 14:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

It's a good page. Unfortunately, there's no specific gallery review page at the moment, so I can't conduct a formal review. --Claritas (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Aagh, sorry didn't know that, I thought if one user promotes the image it gets promoted as a QI, thanks for removing the tag, now I came to know about QICbot too, thanks. Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 11:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Normally one user's opinion is enough, but you have to wait to make sure that no-one disagrees. --Claritas (talk) 11:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Claritas, thanks for nominating my image, Stone Urn, for QI, and for fixing the chromatic aberration. I had given up on it really so it was a very pleasant surprise. --Stu Phillips --Str Photo 02:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem - it's a lovely photo. --Claritas (talk) 10:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gabrielle Cot 1890.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gabrielle Cot 1890.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmm

[1] If you really were S Larctia, I did wonder what happened to you. But I don't understand this comment, especially when I have quite a lot of uploads and I have dealt with patrolling, serious copyright issues, etc. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I am a patroller. There is no requirement to constantly put up new content. Nor do I produce "quality images" because that requires types of equipment that I do not use. And you speak about Commons where I have a much more substantial background on than you do. I also have a high rate of deletions in my nominations, especially regarding copyright concerns. And you know the reason why my 20,000 image upload related to the Wikiversity archaeology/cultural preservation project was halted. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

"but most users consider your behaviour antagonistic" I don't see evidence of most, but the nature of disputes is antagonism. By definition, "disagreeing" is "antagonistic". "unlike you I have uploaded several featured pictures" Featured pictures also doesn't have real meaning on Commons. Feature pictures are derived from camera type, expensive equipment, etc., and are a simple quick vote. It is nothing like a rigorous process similar to featured articles, which I had 12. Furthermore, I only upload things that can be used. I have always stood against Commons being a base image repository no matter how pretty the images may be. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

And just so you know, I didn't mean an attack on FP to be an attack on you, just my unwillingness to ever bother with such a process. I don't care for votes to determine if my work is meaningful or not. The FAC process has people go through and give critical advice and that matters to me. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I'd quite like to be unbanned at Wikipedia some day, so the FPs act as flashy symbols of my achievements. The label isn't really an achievement in itself. FAC is more thorough mainly because there is a limit to what can be changed once a photograph has been taken.--Claritas (talk) 21:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

FP wont get you unbanned at en.wiki. Content doesn't matter. Bans are arbitrary, just like unbans. You should know that by now. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Content doesn't really matter, but the only conceivable way for me to get an unban is to go into exile for a few months while showing that I can get along with people without arguing or socking.--Claritas (talk) 01:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I think what matters is standing up for what you believe in. The rest is all frivolous. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I'm uploading the rest of the reports (wont be able to do the individual images though because there are thousands and they take time to prep). I think I will have all 3000+ pages uploaded by tonight. Fyi. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:05, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Do you still honestly think that I am "more interested in trolling"? Ottava Rima (talk) 18:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I've now uploaded over 1000 images in the past few days. Ottava Rima (talk) 03:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Ottava, I hate to have to explain this to you, but the more you insist that my judgement of you was mistaken, the less likely I am to change my mind. Stop editing Commons: namespace at all. Cut the drama completely for a few days, and I'll advocate for you quite happily. --Claritas (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

I stopped for 3 days and made uploads, but then you supported the ban. During that time, many other pile on supports came with really nasty comments and the rest. Without responses, they continued. After I started commenting, the opposes were given grounds to justify opposes. And Commons's namespace is 90% of Commons, as the deletion discussions are essential to the rest of the project. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Image guidelines - downsampling

Hello. Thank you for your review of my picture. A discussion has started on the matter of downsampling, if you would like to share your view. Cheers, Gidip (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Help

I tried to nominate this to be a candidate for Commons:Valued image candidates but i don't know what to do. I have tried to follow the instruction but it didn't work to me. Can you help me? Tell me on which steps i did wrong so i can learn and do it myself for next time. Thanks!Trongphu (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Wow ok. Thanks!Trongphu (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gul tre skilling banco.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gul tre skilling banco.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Man with a Saluki.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Man with a Saluki.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Self-portrait by Jacques-Louis David (1794).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2010 0515 rama 4 and sathorn 22a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Morning, Interior - Luce.jpeg

So you're opposing your own nomination? You might as well withdraw it then. Sorry if I've been a bit to critical though. TrebleSeven (talk) 19:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Francesco d'Este.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Low resolution, but best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Edna-adan-maternity-hospital-hargeisa.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edna Adan Maternity Hospital.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you for your goods for me.. Toronaro (talk) 02:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks ! --Claritas (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg

I was just about to revert myself.[2] Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Morning, Interior - Luce.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morning, Interior - Luce.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Cause for concern?

Please explain your actions. I do have another life beside editing here. TrebleSeven (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Incompetence

Define it. Then let an admin deal with this situation. TrebleSeven (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Opinions

My oppose stays neutral. TrebleSeven (talk) 11:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Question

Please, see my question about changing the ".png format" to for example ".jpg format" here: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinway & Sons concert grand piano, model D-274, manufactured at Steinway's factory in Hamburg, Germany.png --Fanoftheworld (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for comment/TrebleSeven

Commons:Requests for comment/TrebleSeven has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TrebleSeven (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Peasant Woman Cooking by a Fireplace.jpeg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peasant Woman Cooking by a Fireplace.jpeg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Cappadocia 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and QI to me, but I don't like the bottom of the image, perhaps -I'm not sure- too sharpened (see note, and please, I appreciate that you delete the note)--Lmbuga 20:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Didgeridoo street player.jpg

Hello Claritas. As you wrote in the vote that you're neutral, I'd be glad if you can change your vote from "oppose", or specify where you're nertual and where you oppose. It may make the change. Tomer T (talk) 18:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit

Hi:

The image Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#File:Catopsilia_pomona_by_kadavoor.JPG is updated by an edit by Paolo Costa to reduce the jpeg artifacts and overexposure. So I request you to update your opinion too.

The white speck is a piece of spider web and he didn't remove it; may I?

Regards, Jee -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

• Piece of spider-web removed. Thanks, Jkadavoor (talk) 05:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

• It seems the 800x600 view is not updating; all other views are correct. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lindos Windmill.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lindos Windmill.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

YUM, YUM?

Gee, are you sure that is a good idea in that size? My randomizing QI template also sometimes puts this up, but in smaller scale and further down the user page. --Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

It's pretty. But I agree, a bit huge. --Claritas (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Coins of Charles VI of France

Hi,

I have proposed this category for deletion, since the naming convention is XXX on coins. The new name should be Category:Charles VI of France on coins. Thanks. Elfix (talk) 13:23, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

a heads-up

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

File:754 Lavery J.jpeg

File:754 Lavery J.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Claritas,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Claritas,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

File:Al-Husayni1929.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish^☎ 07:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

File:13 states - Guffefeld.jpeg

File:13 states - Guffefeld.jpeg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of File:F. L. Güssefeld, Map of North America, 1784.jpg. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 00:06, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Beznau - emergency switch.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Zurich, Schilling 1640.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2soles1863.png

And also:

• File:2soles1863reverse.png
• File:Chaisedor.jpeg
• File:Pepinquentovicdenier.jpeg
• File:Senonesstater.jpeg
• File:Venetistater1.jpeg
• File:Vericastater.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)