Last modified on 26 September 2014, at 17:42

User talk:Zarateman

Return to "Zarateman" page.

Categorías Altars in Spain y Church interiors in SpainEdit

Hola, Zarateman, te felicito por el entusiasmo con el que te has incorporado a Commons, y por todas las imágenes que has subido. Quería comentarte, dado que has estado recategorizando imágenes de iglesias, que no entiendo algunas de tus ediciones, en las que, cuando aparece un altar, eliminas esa categoría para sustituirla por la más genérica "Church interiors in Spain" Existen varios problemas en eso: por un lado quitas la oportunidad de que se encuentren esas imágenes por parte de los que entran en la categoría altares buscando precisamente eso, y por otro lado, y esto es un poco más sutil, si incorporas "altars in Spain" en la categoría "Church interiors in Spain" estás dejando de lado altares que no están o no estuvieron nunca en una iglesia, tanto cristianos (al aire libre, en plazas o en el campo, al exterior de iglesias o efímeros) como, por ejemplo, altares paganos romanos o pre-romanos, por poner dos casos que me vienen a la mente de altares no vinculados a iglesias cristianas. Me gustaría saber tu opinión al respecto. Gracias por tu atención.--Balbo 19:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Me parece razonable tu explicación. Creo que las que aparecen mesas de altar deberían, efectivamente, figurar en Altars in Spain. Lo de los altares paganos merece un tiempo (por ejemplo, para localizar las imágenes de esos altares que ya estén en commons, o para ver cómo se llaman las nuevas categorías para no liar al personal). Cuando tenga un rato veré qué puedo hacer. Te avisaré antes para ver si te parecen bien los cambios. Un saludo, --Balbo 20:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

¡Cuidado con las cúpulas!Edit

Hola otra vez, Zarateman. Hay otro aspecto que acabo de ver que merece una reflexión. En este caso se trata de la Category:Domes in Spain Ahí si que no me cabe ninguna duda que su adscripción a Church interiors in Spain no es adecuada: 1- Dome significa cúpula [1], que no tiene ninguna implicación religiosa como forma arquitectónica. Cierto es que hay muchas (muchísimas) cúpulas en iglesias, pero hay también multitud de ellas en palacios, casas, ministerios, mezquitas, obras civiles modernas y muchos otros tipos arquitectónicos.

2- Las cúpulas se pueden fotografiar al interior o al exterior, con lo cual no tiene sentido conlocar la categoría como interiors, puesto que en la categoría se incluyen multitud de exteriores de cúpulas.

Con esto te pido que tengas en cuenta este tipo de consideraciones antes de cambiar o incluir unas categorías en otras. La gran mayoría de estilos arquitectónicos occidentales y casi todos los elementos de la arquitectura clásica y medieval tienen representación en iglesias, pero deben de pertenecer a dicha categoría sólo aquellos que son característicos de las iglesias, por ejemplo, ábside, iconostasis, sagrario, sacristía... y no otras como portada, cúpula, bóveda, vidriera...

Muchas gracias por tu trabajo, que veo que es activo y muy fructífero, para llenar los vacíos que todavía hay en Commons. Un afectuoso saludo, --Balbo 12:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Perfecto: Category:Church domes in Spain podría ser útil dentro de Category:Churches in Spain y Category:Domes in Spain además de la posible creación de Category:Church domes. Las creo y las empiezo a llenar ya. ¡Un saludo!--Balbo 14:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Vaults in SpainEdit

Estimado Zarateman: En varias ocasiones, juntamente con mi felicitación por tu actividad general en Commons que ahora reitero, te he hecho notar un problema relativo a las categorías que estás creando. Me das la razón, pero acto seguido continúas categorizándolas incorrectamente. Repito otra vez: ":Category:Vaults in Spain" no debe estar incluida en Category:Churches in Spain o en Category:Church interiors in Spain o en ninguna categoría que implique un uso concreto, porque Vault significa bóveda, y bóvedas hay, ha habido y habrá en todo tipo de edificios, desde escuelas hasta palacios, desde mezquitas hasta soportales, desde casas hasta edificios institucionales, y la lista es infinita. No podríamos categorizar con todas esas etiquetas porque sería absurdo. No entiendo cómo éste razonamiento, que te resultó válido para :Category:domes in Spain no te vale a la hora de volver a etiquetar la categoría de bóvedas que yo ya había corregido. Te ruego que antes de hacer más cambios a ese respecto razones cuáles son tus argumentos bien en nuestras páginas de discusión o en el Café de Commons. Un saludo,--Balbo 18:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Hola otra vez. Tu actitud reincidente y sin diálogo (tu única intervención ha sido para darme la razón y seguir haciendo lo mismo) es inaceptable. Por favor, deja de etiquetar elementos arquitectónicos como Vaults in Spain bajo la categoría Churches in Spain, o bien argumenta de una forma sólida los cambios. De otra manera, lo consideraré vandalismo y tendré que ponerlo en conocimiento de los administradores de Commons. He abierto la páginaCategory talk:Vaults in Spain Un saludo, --Balbo (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

GraciasEdit

Me alegro de que te hayan gustado las fotos. Las de las obras fue una oportunidad muy buena porque el arquitecto es amigo y nos lo enseñó muy bien en su día. Justo en este momento acabamos de regresar de otra excursión más a Valbuena (y otros sitios), así que en cuanto tenga un poco de tiempo voy a subir más fotos y mejores, ya sabes el progreso ;-). Hemos podido hacer bastantes. Se ve que depende de la "benevolencia" de cada cual (siempre que seas respetuoso y no utilices el flash). Ya te avisaré. Un saludo. Lourdes (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Demasiadas fotos de museos e iglesias en la página de Vitoria-GasteizEdit

Hola Zarateman, he estado revisando la página de Vitoria-Gasteiz, y me da la impresión de que tiene demasiadas fotos de museos e iglesias. En otras páginas, como por ejemplo en Roma, solo se incluye una foto para cada iglesia o museo. Me gustaría eliminar la mayor parte de estas fotos e introducir otras representativas de otros elementos de la ciudad: deporte, calles, etc. Como eres tú el que ha creado la página y quien la está manteniendo, me gustaría saber tu opinión.--Assar (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Perfecto.--Assar (talk) 20:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Palencia_-_San_Pablo_15.JPGEdit

We had a server problem when you uploaded this image. Somehow, the license got lost. Please add the license manually, otherwise this file will be deleted after seven days. Cheers, Lupo 08:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

categoriasEdit

Hola Zarateman

He observado que has modificado la categoría a esta imagen

Torre cate.jpg

estaba dentro de la categoría Category:Cathedrals in Spain, y lo has eliminado

Tu crees que la gente de otros paises saben donde esta Navarra o Tudela?

ya me dirás tus razonamientos, y la próxima vez pon el porque la cambias o quitas, así si no estoy de acuerdo vengo por aquí.


un saludo

Papix


Image:Vitoria - Palacio de Montehermoso 10.jpgEdit

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but Image:Vitoria - Palacio de Montehermoso 10.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

--Dodo (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Category:Capitals in CataloniaEdit

Please do not remove content from pages like you did here. If you want something deleted, use {{speedydelete|reason}}  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Zarateman!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Bilbao - San Mames.jpgEdit

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Bilbao - San Mames.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

--KTo288 (talk) 07:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:Cities and villages in ÁlavaEdit

Kaixo, Zarateman. Euskara ba al dakizu? Jakin nahi nuke ea zertarako sortu duzun kategoria berri hori. Iruditzen zait beharrezkoa ez den errepikapena dela. Eskerrik asko.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 11:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

FechaEdit

Hola

Según Commons el día 13 a las 23 y pico subiste una imagen que fechaste como "2009-12-14" [2]. Puede que según la hora local, acabaras de editar el archivo la madrugada del 14, pero la foto no pudo ser tomada el 14 ¿Puedes completar de qué día es esa vista del Carlton? Gracias. --Javier ME (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Burgos - CAB 14.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Burgos - CAB 14.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Problema con categoríasEdit

Hola Zarateman. Me encuentro con el problema de que estoy haciendo algunas cosas al revés de lo que tú las haces y sería conveniente ponernos de acuerdo:

Personalmente pienso que, si seguimos tu esquema, hai que cambiar las categorías de toda España, no solamente las de las iglesias, y la estructura final será más absurda.

Un cordial saludo--Iesmgb2 (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Gracias. Saber que estás de acuerdo me da seguridad. A ver si uno de estos días organizo esas categorías de iglesias--Iesmgb2 (talk) 15:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
No. "Pontevedra (city)" es la ciudad, "Pontevedra" es el ayuntamiento (en esa categoría se recogen las iglesias de las diferentes parroquias que no conforman la ciudad). "Province of Pontevedra" es la provincia. O así lo veo yo--Iesmgb2 (talk) 15:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Aclaración: La toponimia de Galicia es muy complicada por lo que debemos seguir el Nomenclator de la Xunta de Galicia. Si existe en el Nomenclator una parroquia dentro del ayuntamiento de Pontevedra es porque no está en el núcleo urbano, pues las del núcleo urbano no aparecen--Iesmgb2 (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

idioma de descripciónEdit

Hola. He corregido el idioma de esta foto. El resto de fotos de la catedral creo que tienen el mismo problema y no sé si algunas tuyas más. Saludos. emijrp (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

A Coruña - La CoruñaEdit

Hola Zarateman, he movido Category:Altar pieces in the province of La Coruña a Category:Altar pieces in the province of A Coruña y Category:Baroque altarpieces in the province of La Coruña a Category:Baroque altarpieces in the province of A Coruña para respetar la toponimia gallega y que no rompa la homogeneidad entre el resto de categorías de esa provincia. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)


ElburgoEdit

Hola

¿Sabes si el edificio de la derecha en File:Elburgo - Iglesia San Pedro 03.JPG es la bolera de interés cultural (es:Bolera de Elburgo / eu:Burguko bolatokia)? Gracias --Javier ME (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_13.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_13.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_13.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_15.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_15.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_15.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_12.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_12.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_12.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_10.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_10.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_10.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_63_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_63_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_63_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_58_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_58_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_58_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_61_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_61_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_61_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_09.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_09.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_09.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_59_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_59_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_59_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_62_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_62_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_62_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_60_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_60_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_60_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Derechos de autorEdit

No me había dado cuenta de que habías subido tu las fotos cuando comencé a marcarlas, sino hubiese actuado de otra forma.

El hecho es que es:Jaume Plensa todavía está vivo, así que tiene los derechos sobre la imagen de sus obras (obras derivadas). Como en esos casos no se aplica la libertad de panorama, tenemos que borrar las imágenes, a no ser que consigamos el permiso del escultor.

Un saludo, --ecelan (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Me hago cargo. Soy enemigo jurado de todo derecho de autor en obras de arte, por muy vivo que esté el autor, a la hora de fotografiarlas y reproducirlas en lugares divulgativos y sin afán de lucro, como Commons. Creo en la distribución libre y universal de todo tipo de material gráfico, sin tarifas ni derechos. Pero una cosa es mi credo y otra las reglas comúnmente establecidas y asumidas. Es una pena, pero adelante con el borrado. Saludos Zarateman (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Interior catedral de Toledo.jpgEdit

Hola Zarateman, acabo de ver que has recategorizado la imagen 'File:Interior catedral de Toledo.jpg' con 'Church of San Ildefonso, Toledo', lo que me hace pensar que la fotografía tiene un nombre que no corresponde con lo que representa ¿podrías intentar arreglar la descripción del archivo (que también indica catedral), y proponer un renombramiento acorde con la imagen? Gracias de antemano. Lobo (howl?) 15:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Categorías Altars in Spain y Church interiors in SpainEdit

Hola, Zarateman, te felicito por el entusiasmo con el que te has incorporado a Commons, y por todas las imágenes que has subido. Quería comentarte, dado que has estado recategorizando imágenes de iglesias, que no entiendo algunas de tus ediciones, en las que, cuando aparece un altar, eliminas esa categoría para sustituirla por la más genérica "Church interiors in Spain" Existen varios problemas en eso: por un lado quitas la oportunidad de que se encuentren esas imágenes por parte de los que entran en la categoría altares buscando precisamente eso, y por otro lado, y esto es un poco más sutil, si incorporas "altars in Spain" en la categoría "Church interiors in Spain" estás dejando de lado altares que no están o no estuvieron nunca en una iglesia, tanto cristianos (al aire libre, en plazas o en el campo, al exterior de iglesias o efímeros) como, por ejemplo, altares paganos romanos o pre-romanos, por poner dos casos que me vienen a la mente de altares no vinculados a iglesias cristianas. Me gustaría saber tu opinión al respecto. Gracias por tu atención.--Balbo 19:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Me parece razonable tu explicación. Creo que las que aparecen mesas de altar deberían, efectivamente, figurar en Altars in Spain. Lo de los altares paganos merece un tiempo (por ejemplo, para localizar las imágenes de esos altares que ya estén en commons, o para ver cómo se llaman las nuevas categorías para no liar al personal). Cuando tenga un rato veré qué puedo hacer. Te avisaré antes para ver si te parecen bien los cambios. Un saludo, --Balbo 20:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

¡Cuidado con las cúpulas!Edit

Hola otra vez, Zarateman. Hay otro aspecto que acabo de ver que merece una reflexión. En este caso se trata de la Category:Domes in Spain Ahí si que no me cabe ninguna duda que su adscripción a Church interiors in Spain no es adecuada: 1- Dome significa cúpula [3], que no tiene ninguna implicación religiosa como forma arquitectónica. Cierto es que hay muchas (muchísimas) cúpulas en iglesias, pero hay también multitud de ellas en palacios, casas, ministerios, mezquitas, obras civiles modernas y muchos otros tipos arquitectónicos.

2- Las cúpulas se pueden fotografiar al interior o al exterior, con lo cual no tiene sentido conlocar la categoría como interiors, puesto que en la categoría se incluyen multitud de exteriores de cúpulas.

Con esto te pido que tengas en cuenta este tipo de consideraciones antes de cambiar o incluir unas categorías en otras. La gran mayoría de estilos arquitectónicos occidentales y casi todos los elementos de la arquitectura clásica y medieval tienen representación en iglesias, pero deben de pertenecer a dicha categoría sólo aquellos que son característicos de las iglesias, por ejemplo, ábside, iconostasis, sagrario, sacristía... y no otras como portada, cúpula, bóveda, vidriera...

Muchas gracias por tu trabajo, que veo que es activo y muy fructífero, para llenar los vacíos que todavía hay en Commons. Un afectuoso saludo, --Balbo 12:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Perfecto: Category:Church domes in Spain podría ser útil dentro de Category:Churches in Spain y Category:Domes in Spain además de la posible creación de Category:Church domes. Las creo y las empiezo a llenar ya. ¡Un saludo!--Balbo 14:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Vaults in SpainEdit

Estimado Zarateman: En varias ocasiones, juntamente con mi felicitación por tu actividad general en Commons que ahora reitero, te he hecho notar un problema relativo a las categorías que estás creando. Me das la razón, pero acto seguido continúas categorizándolas incorrectamente. Repito otra vez: ":Category:Vaults in Spain" no debe estar incluida en Category:Churches in Spain o en Category:Church interiors in Spain o en ninguna categoría que implique un uso concreto, porque Vault significa bóveda, y bóvedas hay, ha habido y habrá en todo tipo de edificios, desde escuelas hasta palacios, desde mezquitas hasta soportales, desde casas hasta edificios institucionales, y la lista es infinita. No podríamos categorizar con todas esas etiquetas porque sería absurdo. No entiendo cómo éste razonamiento, que te resultó válido para :Category:domes in Spain no te vale a la hora de volver a etiquetar la categoría de bóvedas que yo ya había corregido. Te ruego que antes de hacer más cambios a ese respecto razones cuáles son tus argumentos bien en nuestras páginas de discusión o en el Café de Commons. Un saludo,--Balbo 18:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Hola otra vez. Tu actitud reincidente y sin diálogo (tu única intervención ha sido para darme la razón y seguir haciendo lo mismo) es inaceptable. Por favor, deja de etiquetar elementos arquitectónicos como Vaults in Spain bajo la categoría Churches in Spain, o bien argumenta de una forma sólida los cambios. De otra manera, lo consideraré vandalismo y tendré que ponerlo en conocimiento de los administradores de Commons. He abierto la páginaCategory talk:Vaults in Spain Un saludo, --Balbo (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

GraciasEdit

Me alegro de que te hayan gustado las fotos. Las de las obras fue una oportunidad muy buena porque el arquitecto es amigo y nos lo enseñó muy bien en su día. Justo en este momento acabamos de regresar de otra excursión más a Valbuena (y otros sitios), así que en cuanto tenga un poco de tiempo voy a subir más fotos y mejores, ya sabes el progreso ;-). Hemos podido hacer bastantes. Se ve que depende de la "benevolencia" de cada cual (siempre que seas respetuoso y no utilices el flash). Ya te avisaré. Un saludo. Lourdes (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Demasiadas fotos de museos e iglesias en la página de Vitoria-GasteizEdit

Hola Zarateman, he estado revisando la página de Vitoria-Gasteiz, y me da la impresión de que tiene demasiadas fotos de museos e iglesias. En otras páginas, como por ejemplo en Roma, solo se incluye una foto para cada iglesia o museo. Me gustaría eliminar la mayor parte de estas fotos e introducir otras representativas de otros elementos de la ciudad: deporte, calles, etc. Como eres tú el que ha creado la página y quien la está manteniendo, me gustaría saber tu opinión.--Assar (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Perfecto.--Assar (talk) 20:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Palencia_-_San_Pablo_15.JPGEdit

We had a server problem when you uploaded this image. Somehow, the license got lost. Please add the license manually, otherwise this file will be deleted after seven days. Cheers, Lupo 08:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

categoriasEdit

Hola Zarateman

He observado que has modificado la categoría a esta imagen

Torre cate.jpg

estaba dentro de la categoría Category:Cathedrals in Spain, y lo has eliminado

Tu crees que la gente de otros paises saben donde esta Navarra o Tudela?

ya me dirás tus razonamientos, y la próxima vez pon el porque la cambias o quitas, así si no estoy de acuerdo vengo por aquí.


un saludo

Papix


Image:Vitoria - Palacio de Montehermoso 10.jpgEdit

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but Image:Vitoria - Palacio de Montehermoso 10.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

--Dodo (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Category:Capitals in CataloniaEdit

Please do not remove content from pages like you did here. If you want something deleted, use {{speedydelete|reason}}  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Zarateman!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Bilbao - San Mames.jpgEdit

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Bilbao - San Mames.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

--KTo288 (talk) 07:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:Cities and villages in ÁlavaEdit

Kaixo, Zarateman. Euskara ba al dakizu? Jakin nahi nuke ea zertarako sortu duzun kategoria berri hori. Iruditzen zait beharrezkoa ez den errepikapena dela. Eskerrik asko.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 11:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

FechaEdit

Hola

Según Commons el día 13 a las 23 y pico subiste una imagen que fechaste como "2009-12-14" [4]. Puede que según la hora local, acabaras de editar el archivo la madrugada del 14, pero la foto no pudo ser tomada el 14 ¿Puedes completar de qué día es esa vista del Carlton? Gracias. --Javier ME (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Burgos - CAB 14.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Burgos - CAB 14.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Problema con categoríasEdit

Hola Zarateman. Me encuentro con el problema de que estoy haciendo algunas cosas al revés de lo que tú las haces y sería conveniente ponernos de acuerdo:

Personalmente pienso que, si seguimos tu esquema, hai que cambiar las categorías de toda España, no solamente las de las iglesias, y la estructura final será más absurda.

Un cordial saludo--Iesmgb2 (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Gracias. Saber que estás de acuerdo me da seguridad. A ver si uno de estos días organizo esas categorías de iglesias--Iesmgb2 (talk) 15:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
No. "Pontevedra (city)" es la ciudad, "Pontevedra" es el ayuntamiento (en esa categoría se recogen las iglesias de las diferentes parroquias que no conforman la ciudad). "Province of Pontevedra" es la provincia. O así lo veo yo--Iesmgb2 (talk) 15:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Aclaración: La toponimia de Galicia es muy complicada por lo que debemos seguir el Nomenclator de la Xunta de Galicia. Si existe en el Nomenclator una parroquia dentro del ayuntamiento de Pontevedra es porque no está en el núcleo urbano, pues las del núcleo urbano no aparecen--Iesmgb2 (talk) 15:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

idioma de descripciónEdit

Hola. He corregido el idioma de esta foto. El resto de fotos de la catedral creo que tienen el mismo problema y no sé si algunas tuyas más. Saludos. emijrp (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

A Coruña - La CoruñaEdit

Hola Zarateman, he movido Category:Altar pieces in the province of La Coruña a Category:Altar pieces in the province of A Coruña y Category:Baroque altarpieces in the province of La Coruña a Category:Baroque altarpieces in the province of A Coruña para respetar la toponimia gallega y que no rompa la homogeneidad entre el resto de categorías de esa provincia. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)


ElburgoEdit

Hola

¿Sabes si el edificio de la derecha en File:Elburgo - Iglesia San Pedro 03.JPG es la bolera de interés cultural (es:Bolera de Elburgo / eu:Burguko bolatokia)? Gracias --Javier ME (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_13.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_13.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_13.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_15.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_15.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_15.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_12.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_12.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_12.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_10.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_10.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_10.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_63_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_63_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_63_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_58_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_58_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_58_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_61_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_61_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_61_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Burgos_-_CAB_09.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Burgos_-_CAB_09.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Burgos_-_CAB_09.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_59_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_59_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_59_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_62_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_62_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_62_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_60_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_60_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_60_-_Seating_Tattoo_IV_(2007)_-_Jaume_Plensa.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ecelan (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Derechos de autorEdit

No me había dado cuenta de que habías subido tu las fotos cuando comencé a marcarlas, sino hubiese actuado de otra forma.

El hecho es que es:Jaume Plensa todavía está vivo, así que tiene los derechos sobre la imagen de sus obras (obras derivadas). Como en esos casos no se aplica la libertad de panorama, tenemos que borrar las imágenes, a no ser que consigamos el permiso del escultor.

Un saludo, --ecelan (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Me hago cargo. Soy enemigo jurado de todo derecho de autor en obras de arte, por muy vivo que esté el autor, a la hora de fotografiarlas y reproducirlas en lugares divulgativos y sin afán de lucro, como Commons. Creo en la distribución libre y universal de todo tipo de material gráfico, sin tarifas ni derechos. Pero una cosa es mi credo y otra las reglas comúnmente establecidas y asumidas. Es una pena, pero adelante con el borrado. Saludos Zarateman (talk) 00:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Interior catedral de Toledo.jpgEdit

Hola Zarateman, acabo de ver que has recategorizado la imagen 'File:Interior catedral de Toledo.jpg' con 'Church of San Ildefonso, Toledo', lo que me hace pensar que la fotografía tiene un nombre que no corresponde con lo que representa ¿podrías intentar arreglar la descripción del archivo (que también indica catedral), y proponer un renombramiento acorde con la imagen? Gracias de antemano. Lobo (howl?) 15:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Please use the correct date formatEdit

Hi Zarateman,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 62 - Seating Tattoo IV (2007) - Jaume Plensa.JPG. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD format (ie. 2014-01 for or 2014-10-01 for ). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}} for "between and ". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in English: here. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 06:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

New categoriesEdit

Very please: Create new categories, if will contain the minimum three files. Categories with the only one file are discouraging to the traversal. Thanks. --Pomeranian (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Teruel - graffiti 10.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Teruel - graffiti 10.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 21:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. LX (talk, contribs) 21:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Vitoria_-_Graffiti_&_Murals_0608.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria_-_Graffiti_&_Murals_0608.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Damiens.rf 19:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Bilbao_-_Guggenheim_24.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bilbao_-_Guggenheim_24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 21:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

GraciasEdit

Ya veo que estás ordenando un poco lo que voy subiendo. La verdad es que me cuesta eso de decidir en qué categoría colocarlas. También voy más tranquilo sabiendo que puedes deshacer los entuertos que pueda ocasionar. Saludos cordiales, --Nemo (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Encantado de saludarte. Espero que mis criterios de categorización sean razonables. En el caso del 15-M de Madrid, el número de pics es ya enorme. Yo mismo subí algunos de mi cosecha. Dentro de la propia categoría Acampada Sol habría que establecer subcategorías con algún criterio, tendríamos que mirarlo. Salud. Zarateman (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: a todo trapoEdit

La verdad es que no había visto las estadísticas estatales ni sabía dónde estaban. De todas formas he oído algo de que el comité español había excluído del concurso la mayoría de monumentos catalanes. Si es así, aún puede ser que ganemos (o perdamos) en concursos diferentes.

Y en calidad me ganas de largo.

Buen trabajo.--Pere prlpz (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Ya veo que no te pillo ni que bajaras el ritmo. Buena suerte, a ver si te encaramas al pódium europeo.--Pere prlpz (talk) 23:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

La SeoEdit

Hola, Muy buenas fotos las de La Seo. Crees que podrías enviarme las imágenes del retablo en alta resolución? Mil gracias

Lamentablemente, las fotos que subo a Commons son las únicas versiones que tengo. No me reservo tomas de mayor resolución. Si las tuviera, las subiría igual. Saludos --Zarateman (talk) 20:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


Ok. Muchas gracias. Lo dicho, buenas fotos

FelicitaciónEdit

He visto algunas de tus numerosas fotos. Son magníficas.

¡Enhorabuena, y gracias!--. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Muy amable. He descubierto con gran alegría que entre tu material figuran unas grandes tomas del pórtico de la Catedral de Tui. Eran muy necesrias en Commons. La portada de Tui conforma, con las de la Basílica de San Vicente de Ávila, la Catedral de Ciudad Rodrigo y la Colegiata de Toro, el poker de ases en cuanto a portadas protogóticas de España. Salud --Zarateman (talk) 22:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Fechas de las imágenesEdit

Hola

En el caso de las fotografías, la fecha de creación (la del campo de date o fecha de la plantilla {{Information}} debe ser la fecha en que se tomó la fotografía original. Pero si no se cambia la fecha, el asistente de subidas pone por defecto la fecha en que sube el fichero a Commons. Así veo que en la página de descripción del fichero File:Gradefes - Monasterio de Santa Maria la Real 27.jpg pone que es una imagen del 19 de septiembre de 2011 , pero según el historial está subida 23:03, 18 September 2011. Puede que el asistente o la página de subidas fije la fecha según la hora local, y el hitorial refleje la hora de Greenwich, y que la subieras el 19 a las 0:03 (ya que por la noche no podías tener una foto de cómo iba a verse el claustro el 19 de día :) Y a las 6 subes otra vista con luz diurna del 19/9, el mismo día tienes fotografías de Cantabria, Palencia y Cuenca, lo que me hace pensar que quizá no completes el campo con la fecha en que tomaste cada foto y el programa ponga la del día de subida. Ya que subes gran cantidad de fotos, y sueles subir varias vistas de cada monumento, podrías usar el asistente para subidas múltiples para subir a la vez varias fotos del mismo día, y poner de seguido la misma fecha en las que correspondan (para que no te suponga tanto trabajo). Salud --Javier ME (talk) 23:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Irun - Iglesia de Nuestra señora del JuncalEdit

Ha subido las imágenes de "Irun - Iglesia de Nuestra señora del Juncal" con el BIC RI-51-000390, que no existe. Primero lo cambié a RI-51-0000390, pensando que te faltaba un cero a la izquierda. Pero esa es la Iglesia de Santa María de Arévalo [5]. Luego pensé si te faltaría a la derecha, pero esa es una iglesia de Asturias [6]. Te falta una cifra, pero no sé cuál es. ¿Puedes buscarla? Encontrado: RI-51-0003907 --Platonides (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Fue un error de copy&paste, sorry. Gracias a ambos --Zarateman (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Identificación de edificio en GijónEdit

Hola.

He corregido la identificación de la foto del Antiguo instituto, que estaba incorrectamente identificado como biblioteca pública. Es un error comprensible porque hace años estuvo allí situada la biblioteca pública; pero hoy en día esta se encuentra situada en un edificio próximo que anteriormente perteneció al Banco de España. El edificio del Antiguo Instituto hoy en día es un centro cultural municipal.

Un saludo. Oriciu (talk) 02:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Zarateman,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Una de las condiciones de participación en el concurso para poder obtener algun premio es tener definida una cuenta de correo electrónico válida en la cuenta de usuario. Es confidencial, preservando la identidad de acuerdo con la política de privacidad de la Fundación Wikimedia. Este será el único medio que la organización utilizará para ponerse en contacto, verificando así al propietario de la cuenta registrada. Puedes definir una dirección de correo, si así lo deseas, en Special:Preferences. --V.Riullop (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Torre IberdrolaEdit

Caray, menudas imágenes. Cómo se nota la calidad. Me he permitido, con tu permiso, incluir un par de imágenes en sendos artículos Torre Iberdrola e Iberdrola, justo a tiempo para la inauguración de mañana. Un cordial saludo. --Viejo sabio (talk) 15:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cloister_of_the_Monastery_of_Santo_Estevo_de_Ribas_do_SilEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Cloister_of_the_Monastery_of_Santo_Estevo_de_Ribas_do_Sil has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

GFreihalter (talk) 08:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:San Sebastian 32.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:San Sebastian 32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jarry1250 (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Edificios históricos de los señores de Igartza en BeasainEdit

Hola, Zarateman. He creado otra vez la categoría para estos edificios, esta vez en inglés, ya que me parece necesaria. Se trata de edificios construidos por orden de los señores de Igartza, fueron explotados por estos durante siglos, y forman un conjunto. Puedes ver explicaciones detalladas en el sitio web oficial de dicho conjunto de edificios: El conjunto de Igartza. Saludos. --Xabier Armendaritz (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Categorías sobre protestasEdit

Hola, Zarateman

He visto que tú y Jacklee habéis creado y movido ficheros en relación a las categorías sobre las protestas en el Basque Country y etcétera. Estoy de acuerdo en que hacía falta meter un poco de orden, pero por ahora, ya que el trabajo sería ingente y no merece la pena por el número de ficheros que hay, pero por ahora sólo quiero comentarte un par de cosas:

  • se han creado categorías sobre las protestas del 15-M con un nombre más trabajado, pero los nombres del resto de protestas en España han quedado igual; el resultado es que antes había un nombre de categoría estándar (aunque no fuera quizás el más adecuado) y ahora no;
  • hay una categoría de protestas por subject y dentro de esta otra por subject opposed; en mi modesta opinión, me parece rizar el rizo: si se trata de protestas, evidentemente son protestas contra algo (si son a favor de algo, se puede entender que son contra que ese algo no se realice, no sé si me explico); me parece que con subject es más que suficiente;
  • hay una categoría de protestas contra el transporte; por ahora no conozco ninguna protesta contra el transporte, sino en todo caso contra el tipo de infraestructuras de transporte y su impacto medioambiental; creo que con environmental problems es más que suficiente.

Me gustaría saber tu opinión al respecto. - Joxemai (talk) 15:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Alfaro - Convento de la Inmaculada Concepcion (MM Concepcionistas Franciscanas) 15.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alfaro - Convento de la Inmaculada Concepcion (MM Concepcionistas Franciscanas) 15.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AtelierMonpli (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Foto errada - Santo Tomás de CanterburyEdit

La iglesia que etiquetas como Santo Tomás de Canterbury, es en realidad una iglesia franciscana ubicada al comienzo de la Calle de La Ferrería, en dirección al Ayuntamiento.

La Iglesia de Santo Tomás de Canterbury es del siglo pasado, y está en la Calle de la Cámara, a unas seis calles de la ubicación de la iglesia que has fotografiado.

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 1000.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 1000.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 15:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Agradecimientos y consulta sobre cómo citarEdit

Estimado Zarateman,

En primer lugar, muchísimas gracias por dejar libres sus fotos, que además están fenomenal. En segundo lugar, he visto en la página de Wikipedia http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castillo_de_Ampudia una fotografía suya titulada “Ampudia - Castillo 1.jpg” (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ampudia_-_Castillo_1.jpg?uselang=es), que me parece muy bonita, con mucho gusto, y muy bien tomada. Quisiera pedirle autorización para reproducirla en un libro que estoy escribiendo –titulado “Viejos Castillos de Castilla la Vieja”–, obviamente citando la procedencia. Si fuera tan amable de permitirme usar su fotografía para este libro en preparación, estaría encantado de enviarle gratuitamente un ejemplar de cualquier libro electrónico de los que ya he publicado (consultar en: http://www.amazon.com/Jos%C3%A9-Mar%C3%ADa-Izquierdo-Rojo/e/B004OWH1RK). En caso afirmativo, también me gustaría preguntarle cómo desearía que le citase (i.e. ¿por su nombre completo?). Un cordial saludo, José M. Izquierdo Rojo --Luis r izquierdo (talk) 08:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Estimado amigo,

Gracias por su interés. Puede usar esa foto y cualquier otra de las que he subido para sus publicaciones electrónicas poniendo como autor o fuente "Zarateman para Wikipedia Commons" o "Zarateman/Wikipedia Commons". O bien "Zarateman" a secas, como desee. Tengo otras 25.000 fotos particulares de temática arquitectónica/artística de España que con el tiempo iré subiendo a Wikipedia, así que si echa en falta algún motivo para ilustrar sus publicaciones, no dude en pedírmelo. --Zarateman (talk) 16:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


Estimado Zarateman, Ya por fin publicamos el libro. Está en: http://www.amazon.es/gp/product/B00EBTCKM2/ref=docs-os-doi_0 Será un placer enviarle una copia, pero necesitaré su dirección de correo electrónico. Puede ponerse en contacto conmigo (Luis, hijo del autor) dando en "Email this user", siguiendo el vínculo de mi firma.

Muchísimas gracias, Luis & José M. Izquierdo --Luis r izquierdo (talk) 11:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 25 - Wrapped road signs (1963) - Christo .JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 25 - Wrapped road signs (1963) - Christo .JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FA2010 (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 23.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 23.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FA2010 (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 31 - The Wall, project (1999) - Christo .JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 31 - The Wall, project (1999) - Christo .JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FA2010 (talk) 10:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Teruel - graffiti 08.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Teruel - graffiti 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ralgistalk 02:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Request from the author of File:Teruel - graffiti 08.jpgEdit

Hello, Zarateman. In OTRS we received a message from someone who claims to be the author of this graffiti, who asks for being recognized as the author. I explained him that you're not suppossed to unless you want to. He asked me to ask you to credit the authorship of graffiti as ELEMAN (of course, you hold the authorship of the photograph). This is for you to decide. Thank you. --Ralgistalk 21:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

No problem. The credit has been added. Thanks for noticing the request. --Zarateman (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Iglesia de la Asunción de VillarmúnEdit

Creo que esta foto tuya no es de la parroquia de la Asunción en Villarmún, a juzgar por las fotos que aparecen aquí y por las fotos que yo mismo tomé hace poco en Villarmún. ¿Podrías aclararlo? Gracias. --DPC (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Disculpa, olvidé responderte. Sí, parece que se trata de un error por mi parte. Voy a tratar de identificar qué iglesia es realmente la que fotografié en Gradefes. Ya te comentaré--Zarateman (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

categoría del palacio de los Velada en ÁvilaEdit

Como sabes, las categorías deben ir en inglés. Bien es cierto que la categoría «Velada's mansion» quedaba algo extraña, aunque no incorrecta. Aprovecho esto para crear Velada's Palace —como traducción de Mansión de los Velada, que es su nombre oficial— y señalar para eliminar las otras dos. Si quieres que me entere, por favor contéstame en mi discusión, gracias. --DPC (talk) 11:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Imágenes de la cultura del País VascoEdit

Hola Zarateman, te escribo porque sé que eres vasco, y resulta que acabo de encontrar una galería en Flickr con multitud de imágenes de eventos en el País Vasco. No sé si la conocerás, pero es esta. Concretamente he estado mirando en su mayoría desde la página 118 en adelante, pero aunque aprecio que en las fotos aparecen muchos elementos de la cultura vasca no sé prácticamente reconocerlos porque me son ajenos y no conozco el euskera, y sería sin duda más apropiado que subieran y describieran las imágenes usuarios que conozcan mejor cuál es el tema de cada fotografía. Quizás la gente que trabaja en la wikipedia en vasco ya se haya percatado de esta galería de Flickr, o quienes estáis en el wikiproyecto Euskal Herria de eswiki, pero si no es así me parecen fotografías de mucho valor como para que se pierdan, y en definitiva puede que sepas mejor que yo cuál puede ser un lugar apropiado donde comentar esto, o quién podría estar interesado en ir subiendo este contenido. Un saludo. Lobo (howl?) 05:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

please add FOP-tag by yourselfEdit

Hi Zaratemann, please add the required {{FoP-Spain}} tag to all your graffiti uploads which show enough planning and creativity (not to mere smears) to be copyrighted. Otherwise re-users may be misled about authorship etc. See for an example. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Church_of_Sagrario,_SevilleEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Church_of_Sagrario,_Seville has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Leyo 22:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Avila_-_Monasterio_de_la_Encarnacion_45.jpgEdit

According to the German expert of Teresa, Father Ulrich Obhan shows this picture not Teresa of Avila before the Mother of God. It is Bernadette Soubirous in Lourdes. It has nothing to do with Teresa. Could you complete the description? --Spartanbu (talk) 11:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0235.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0235.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0236.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0236.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0237.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0237.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Un favor muy especialEdit

Nunca hemos hablado antes pero me alegro de saludarle, porque es uno de los usuarios de Commons que más admiro, ya que ha subido usted miles de imagines relacionadas con Iglesias y monasteries, tema que me encanta.

Quería pedirle un favor: ¿Podría usted subir por casualidad alguna imagen de la arqueta de San Isidoro, que se conserva en el museo de la basilica de San Isidoro de León?. Aquí le dejo un enlace de la imagen de la arqueta:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arqueta_de_plata_de_San_Isidoro_de_Le%C3%B3n.jpg

La imagen la subí yo y procede de Internet pero corre peligro de ser borrada. Si usted dispone de imagenes de la misma o sabe de alguien que disponga de ellas le quedaría eternamente agradecido. Mi más sincera enhorabuena por su magnífico trabajo.

Quedo a su entera disposición.--Lancastermerrin88 (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hola, Lancastermerrin88, también te conozco por tu actividad fotográfica monumental... Dispongo de varias fotos de San Isidoro para subir, pero lamentablemente ninguna del Museo. Creo recorder que está rigurosamente prohibido hacer fotos allí. No siempre respeto este tipo de prohibiciones, pero en esta ocasión acaté. Entiendo que los codices y los tesoros allí expuestos tienen unos derechos de reproducción muy restringidos. No puede hablarse en estos casos de "derechos de autor", sino más bien de "derechos de propiedad": ciertos monopolios de reproducciones gráficas en libros, postales, etc. Un placer conocerte. Salud --Zarateman (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Frankenstein picEdit

Hi, Zarateman. Many thanks to you for posting so much public domain material on Wikimedia Commons. I would just like you to know that I am using the Frankenstein file for a book cover. it is File: Vitoria-Graffiti & Murals 0692.JPG I'm a retiree on low income, so I can't afford to pay for covers. Your photo gave me a first class cover, however. I have just one concern. I saw the same image of Frankenstein for sale on ALLPosters. Their image was of red color and clear of marks like the criss cross marks shown on Wikipedia. I was just wondering if ALLPosters has any claim on this image. Thank you again for all the public domain images.

Donald H Sullivan dhsully@gmail.com

Dear sir, my uploaded pic is a photograph of a street graffiti. I have checked All Posters looking for Frankenstein stuff and found a similar face, red tinged, but it is a different image. As far as I know, All Posters has no relation with my protograph. All the best --Zarateman (talk) 21:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Zarateman Thank you for clearing it up for me. Best Regards, Donald

Un favorEdit

El favor que quería pedirle es el siguiente: ¿Dispone usted por casualidad de una fotografía del sepulcro de Sancho de Castilla, nieto de Alfonso X el Sabio, que fue sepultado en Santa María la Mayor de Ledesma (Salamanca)? ¿Podría usted hacer una foto del sepulcro?

Le quedo agradecido de antemano.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

¿Y por casualidad dispone usted de una fotografía de la arqueta de piedra donde reposan los restos del célebre Don Juan Manuel, nieto de Fernando III el Santo, que está colocada en el presbiterio del convento de San Pablo de Peñafiel?--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Estimado señor: no poseo ninguna de las dos fotos. Sin embargo, en Commons ha está subido un pic de la arqueta de Don Juan Manuel: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Valladolid_Pe%C3%B1afiel_arqueta_piedra_infante_Juan_Manuel_ni.jpg . Saludos cordiales.--Zarateman (talk) 07:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Fotografías subidas a la FerropediaEdit

Fotografías tuyas subidas a la Ferropedia:

Un saludo.--JT Curses (talk) 07:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

New categoriesEdit

Very please: Create new categories, if will contain the minimum three files. Categories with the only one file are discouraging to the traversal. Thanks. --Pomeranian (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Teruel - graffiti 10.jpgEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Teruel - graffiti 10.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 21:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. LX (talk, contribs) 21:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Vitoria_-_Graffiti_&_Murals_0608.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria_-_Graffiti_&_Murals_0608.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Damiens.rf 19:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Bilbao_-_Guggenheim_24.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bilbao_-_Guggenheim_24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 21:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

GraciasEdit

Ya veo que estás ordenando un poco lo que voy subiendo. La verdad es que me cuesta eso de decidir en qué categoría colocarlas. También voy más tranquilo sabiendo que puedes deshacer los entuertos que pueda ocasionar. Saludos cordiales, --Nemo (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Encantado de saludarte. Espero que mis criterios de categorización sean razonables. En el caso del 15-M de Madrid, el número de pics es ya enorme. Yo mismo subí algunos de mi cosecha. Dentro de la propia categoría Acampada Sol habría que establecer subcategorías con algún criterio, tendríamos que mirarlo. Salud. Zarateman (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: a todo trapoEdit

La verdad es que no había visto las estadísticas estatales ni sabía dónde estaban. De todas formas he oído algo de que el comité español había excluído del concurso la mayoría de monumentos catalanes. Si es así, aún puede ser que ganemos (o perdamos) en concursos diferentes.

Y en calidad me ganas de largo.

Buen trabajo.--Pere prlpz (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Ya veo que no te pillo ni que bajaras el ritmo. Buena suerte, a ver si te encaramas al pódium europeo.--Pere prlpz (talk) 23:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

La SeoEdit

Hola, Muy buenas fotos las de La Seo. Crees que podrías enviarme las imágenes del retablo en alta resolución? Mil gracias

Lamentablemente, las fotos que subo a Commons son las únicas versiones que tengo. No me reservo tomas de mayor resolución. Si las tuviera, las subiría igual. Saludos --Zarateman (talk) 20:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


Ok. Muchas gracias. Lo dicho, buenas fotos

FelicitaciónEdit

He visto algunas de tus numerosas fotos. Son magníficas.

¡Enhorabuena, y gracias!--. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Muy amable. He descubierto con gran alegría que entre tu material figuran unas grandes tomas del pórtico de la Catedral de Tui. Eran muy necesrias en Commons. La portada de Tui conforma, con las de la Basílica de San Vicente de Ávila, la Catedral de Ciudad Rodrigo y la Colegiata de Toro, el poker de ases en cuanto a portadas protogóticas de España. Salud --Zarateman (talk) 22:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Fechas de las imágenesEdit

Hola

En el caso de las fotografías, la fecha de creación (la del campo de date o fecha de la plantilla {{Information}} debe ser la fecha en que se tomó la fotografía original. Pero si no se cambia la fecha, el asistente de subidas pone por defecto la fecha en que sube el fichero a Commons. Así veo que en la página de descripción del fichero File:Gradefes - Monasterio de Santa Maria la Real 27.jpg pone que es una imagen del 19 de septiembre de 2011 , pero según el historial está subida 23:03, 18 September 2011. Puede que el asistente o la página de subidas fije la fecha según la hora local, y el hitorial refleje la hora de Greenwich, y que la subieras el 19 a las 0:03 (ya que por la noche no podías tener una foto de cómo iba a verse el claustro el 19 de día :) Y a las 6 subes otra vista con luz diurna del 19/9, el mismo día tienes fotografías de Cantabria, Palencia y Cuenca, lo que me hace pensar que quizá no completes el campo con la fecha en que tomaste cada foto y el programa ponga la del día de subida. Ya que subes gran cantidad de fotos, y sueles subir varias vistas de cada monumento, podrías usar el asistente para subidas múltiples para subir a la vez varias fotos del mismo día, y poner de seguido la misma fecha en las que correspondan (para que no te suponga tanto trabajo). Salud --Javier ME (talk) 23:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Irun - Iglesia de Nuestra señora del JuncalEdit

Ha subido las imágenes de "Irun - Iglesia de Nuestra señora del Juncal" con el BIC RI-51-000390, que no existe. Primero lo cambié a RI-51-0000390, pensando que te faltaba un cero a la izquierda. Pero esa es la Iglesia de Santa María de Arévalo [7]. Luego pensé si te faltaría a la derecha, pero esa es una iglesia de Asturias [8]. Te falta una cifra, pero no sé cuál es. ¿Puedes buscarla? Encontrado: RI-51-0003907 --Platonides (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Fue un error de copy&paste, sorry. Gracias a ambos --Zarateman (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Identificación de edificio en GijónEdit

Hola.

He corregido la identificación de la foto del Antiguo instituto, que estaba incorrectamente identificado como biblioteca pública. Es un error comprensible porque hace años estuvo allí situada la biblioteca pública; pero hoy en día esta se encuentra situada en un edificio próximo que anteriormente perteneció al Banco de España. El edificio del Antiguo Instituto hoy en día es un centro cultural municipal.

Un saludo. Oriciu (talk) 02:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Zarateman,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Una de las condiciones de participación en el concurso para poder obtener algun premio es tener definida una cuenta de correo electrónico válida en la cuenta de usuario. Es confidencial, preservando la identidad de acuerdo con la política de privacidad de la Fundación Wikimedia. Este será el único medio que la organización utilizará para ponerse en contacto, verificando así al propietario de la cuenta registrada. Puedes definir una dirección de correo, si así lo deseas, en Special:Preferences. --V.Riullop (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Torre IberdrolaEdit

Caray, menudas imágenes. Cómo se nota la calidad. Me he permitido, con tu permiso, incluir un par de imágenes en sendos artículos Torre Iberdrola e Iberdrola, justo a tiempo para la inauguración de mañana. Un cordial saludo. --Viejo sabio (talk) 15:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cloister_of_the_Monastery_of_Santo_Estevo_de_Ribas_do_SilEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Cloister_of_the_Monastery_of_Santo_Estevo_de_Ribas_do_Sil has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

GFreihalter (talk) 08:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:San Sebastian 32.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:San Sebastian 32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jarry1250 (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Edificios históricos de los señores de Igartza en BeasainEdit

Hola, Zarateman. He creado otra vez la categoría para estos edificios, esta vez en inglés, ya que me parece necesaria. Se trata de edificios construidos por orden de los señores de Igartza, fueron explotados por estos durante siglos, y forman un conjunto. Puedes ver explicaciones detalladas en el sitio web oficial de dicho conjunto de edificios: El conjunto de Igartza. Saludos. --Xabier Armendaritz (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Categorías sobre protestasEdit

Hola, Zarateman

He visto que tú y Jacklee habéis creado y movido ficheros en relación a las categorías sobre las protestas en el Basque Country y etcétera. Estoy de acuerdo en que hacía falta meter un poco de orden, pero por ahora, ya que el trabajo sería ingente y no merece la pena por el número de ficheros que hay, pero por ahora sólo quiero comentarte un par de cosas:

  • se han creado categorías sobre las protestas del 15-M con un nombre más trabajado, pero los nombres del resto de protestas en España han quedado igual; el resultado es que antes había un nombre de categoría estándar (aunque no fuera quizás el más adecuado) y ahora no;
  • hay una categoría de protestas por subject y dentro de esta otra por subject opposed; en mi modesta opinión, me parece rizar el rizo: si se trata de protestas, evidentemente son protestas contra algo (si son a favor de algo, se puede entender que son contra que ese algo no se realice, no sé si me explico); me parece que con subject es más que suficiente;
  • hay una categoría de protestas contra el transporte; por ahora no conozco ninguna protesta contra el transporte, sino en todo caso contra el tipo de infraestructuras de transporte y su impacto medioambiental; creo que con environmental problems es más que suficiente.

Me gustaría saber tu opinión al respecto. - Joxemai (talk) 15:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Alfaro - Convento de la Inmaculada Concepcion (MM Concepcionistas Franciscanas) 15.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alfaro - Convento de la Inmaculada Concepcion (MM Concepcionistas Franciscanas) 15.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AtelierMonpli (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Foto errada - Santo Tomás de CanterburyEdit

La iglesia que etiquetas como Santo Tomás de Canterbury, es en realidad una iglesia franciscana ubicada al comienzo de la Calle de La Ferrería, en dirección al Ayuntamiento.

La Iglesia de Santo Tomás de Canterbury es del siglo pasado, y está en la Calle de la Cámara, a unas seis calles de la ubicación de la iglesia que has fotografiado.

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 1000.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 1000.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 15:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Agradecimientos y consulta sobre cómo citarEdit

Estimado Zarateman,

En primer lugar, muchísimas gracias por dejar libres sus fotos, que además están fenomenal. En segundo lugar, he visto en la página de Wikipedia http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castillo_de_Ampudia una fotografía suya titulada “Ampudia - Castillo 1.jpg” (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ampudia_-_Castillo_1.jpg?uselang=es), que me parece muy bonita, con mucho gusto, y muy bien tomada. Quisiera pedirle autorización para reproducirla en un libro que estoy escribiendo –titulado “Viejos Castillos de Castilla la Vieja”–, obviamente citando la procedencia. Si fuera tan amable de permitirme usar su fotografía para este libro en preparación, estaría encantado de enviarle gratuitamente un ejemplar de cualquier libro electrónico de los que ya he publicado (consultar en: http://www.amazon.com/Jos%C3%A9-Mar%C3%ADa-Izquierdo-Rojo/e/B004OWH1RK). En caso afirmativo, también me gustaría preguntarle cómo desearía que le citase (i.e. ¿por su nombre completo?). Un cordial saludo, José M. Izquierdo Rojo --Luis r izquierdo (talk) 08:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Estimado amigo,

Gracias por su interés. Puede usar esa foto y cualquier otra de las que he subido para sus publicaciones electrónicas poniendo como autor o fuente "Zarateman para Wikipedia Commons" o "Zarateman/Wikipedia Commons". O bien "Zarateman" a secas, como desee. Tengo otras 25.000 fotos particulares de temática arquitectónica/artística de España que con el tiempo iré subiendo a Wikipedia, así que si echa en falta algún motivo para ilustrar sus publicaciones, no dude en pedírmelo. --Zarateman (talk) 16:09, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


Estimado Zarateman, Ya por fin publicamos el libro. Está en: http://www.amazon.es/gp/product/B00EBTCKM2/ref=docs-os-doi_0 Será un placer enviarle una copia, pero necesitaré su dirección de correo electrónico. Puede ponerse en contacto conmigo (Luis, hijo del autor) dando en "Email this user", siguiendo el vínculo de mi firma.

Muchísimas gracias, Luis & José M. Izquierdo --Luis r izquierdo (talk) 11:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 25 - Wrapped road signs (1963) - Christo .JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 25 - Wrapped road signs (1963) - Christo .JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FA2010 (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 23.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 23.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FA2010 (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 31 - The Wall, project (1999) - Christo .JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agoncillo - Würth Rioja, Museo 31 - The Wall, project (1999) - Christo .JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FA2010 (talk) 10:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Teruel - graffiti 08.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Teruel - graffiti 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ralgistalk 02:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Request from the author of File:Teruel - graffiti 08.jpgEdit

Hello, Zarateman. In OTRS we received a message from someone who claims to be the author of this graffiti, who asks for being recognized as the author. I explained him that you're not suppossed to unless you want to. He asked me to ask you to credit the authorship of graffiti as ELEMAN (of course, you hold the authorship of the photograph). This is for you to decide. Thank you. --Ralgistalk 21:02, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

No problem. The credit has been added. Thanks for noticing the request. --Zarateman (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Iglesia de la Asunción de VillarmúnEdit

Creo que esta foto tuya no es de la parroquia de la Asunción en Villarmún, a juzgar por las fotos que aparecen aquí y por las fotos que yo mismo tomé hace poco en Villarmún. ¿Podrías aclararlo? Gracias. --DPC (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Disculpa, olvidé responderte. Sí, parece que se trata de un error por mi parte. Voy a tratar de identificar qué iglesia es realmente la que fotografié en Gradefes. Ya te comentaré--Zarateman (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

categoría del palacio de los Velada en ÁvilaEdit

Como sabes, las categorías deben ir en inglés. Bien es cierto que la categoría «Velada's mansion» quedaba algo extraña, aunque no incorrecta. Aprovecho esto para crear Velada's Palace —como traducción de Mansión de los Velada, que es su nombre oficial— y señalar para eliminar las otras dos. Si quieres que me entere, por favor contéstame en mi discusión, gracias. --DPC (talk) 11:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Imágenes de la cultura del País VascoEdit

Hola Zarateman, te escribo porque sé que eres vasco, y resulta que acabo de encontrar una galería en Flickr con multitud de imágenes de eventos en el País Vasco. No sé si la conocerás, pero es esta. Concretamente he estado mirando en su mayoría desde la página 118 en adelante, pero aunque aprecio que en las fotos aparecen muchos elementos de la cultura vasca no sé prácticamente reconocerlos porque me son ajenos y no conozco el euskera, y sería sin duda más apropiado que subieran y describieran las imágenes usuarios que conozcan mejor cuál es el tema de cada fotografía. Quizás la gente que trabaja en la wikipedia en vasco ya se haya percatado de esta galería de Flickr, o quienes estáis en el wikiproyecto Euskal Herria de eswiki, pero si no es así me parecen fotografías de mucho valor como para que se pierdan, y en definitiva puede que sepas mejor que yo cuál puede ser un lugar apropiado donde comentar esto, o quién podría estar interesado en ir subiendo este contenido. Un saludo. Lobo (howl?) 05:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

please add FOP-tag by yourselfEdit

Hi Zaratemann, please add the required {{FoP-Spain}} tag to all your graffiti uploads which show enough planning and creativity (not to mere smears) to be copyrighted. Otherwise re-users may be misled about authorship etc. See for an example. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Category:Church_of_Sagrario,_SevilleEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Church_of_Sagrario,_Seville has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Leyo 22:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Avila_-_Monasterio_de_la_Encarnacion_45.jpgEdit

According to the German expert of Teresa, Father Ulrich Obhan shows this picture not Teresa of Avila before the Mother of God. It is Bernadette Soubirous in Lourdes. It has nothing to do with Teresa. Could you complete the description? --Spartanbu (talk) 11:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0235.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0235.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0236.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0236.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0237.JPGEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0237.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Un favor muy especialEdit

Nunca hemos hablado antes pero me alegro de saludarle, porque es uno de los usuarios de Commons que más admiro, ya que ha subido usted miles de imagines relacionadas con Iglesias y monasteries, tema que me encanta.

Quería pedirle un favor: ¿Podría usted subir por casualidad alguna imagen de la arqueta de San Isidoro, que se conserva en el museo de la basilica de San Isidoro de León?. Aquí le dejo un enlace de la imagen de la arqueta:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arqueta_de_plata_de_San_Isidoro_de_Le%C3%B3n.jpg

La imagen la subí yo y procede de Internet pero corre peligro de ser borrada. Si usted dispone de imagenes de la misma o sabe de alguien que disponga de ellas le quedaría eternamente agradecido. Mi más sincera enhorabuena por su magnífico trabajo.

Quedo a su entera disposición.--Lancastermerrin88 (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hola, Lancastermerrin88, también te conozco por tu actividad fotográfica monumental... Dispongo de varias fotos de San Isidoro para subir, pero lamentablemente ninguna del Museo. Creo recorder que está rigurosamente prohibido hacer fotos allí. No siempre respeto este tipo de prohibiciones, pero en esta ocasión acaté. Entiendo que los codices y los tesoros allí expuestos tienen unos derechos de reproducción muy restringidos. No puede hablarse en estos casos de "derechos de autor", sino más bien de "derechos de propiedad": ciertos monopolios de reproducciones gráficas en libros, postales, etc. Un placer conocerte. Salud --Zarateman (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Frankenstein picEdit

Hi, Zarateman. Many thanks to you for posting so much public domain material on Wikimedia Commons. I would just like you to know that I am using the Frankenstein file for a book cover. it is File: Vitoria-Graffiti & Murals 0692.JPG I'm a retiree on low income, so I can't afford to pay for covers. Your photo gave me a first class cover, however. I have just one concern. I saw the same image of Frankenstein for sale on ALLPosters. Their image was of red color and clear of marks like the criss cross marks shown on Wikipedia. I was just wondering if ALLPosters has any claim on this image. Thank you again for all the public domain images.

Donald H Sullivan dhsully@gmail.com

Dear sir, my uploaded pic is a photograph of a street graffiti. I have checked All Posters looking for Frankenstein stuff and found a similar face, red tinged, but it is a different image. As far as I know, All Posters has no relation with my protograph. All the best --Zarateman (talk) 21:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Zarateman Thank you for clearing it up for me. Best Regards, Donald

Un favorEdit

El favor que quería pedirle es el siguiente: ¿Dispone usted por casualidad de una fotografía del sepulcro de Sancho de Castilla, nieto de Alfonso X el Sabio, que fue sepultado en Santa María la Mayor de Ledesma (Salamanca)? ¿Podría usted hacer una foto del sepulcro?

Le quedo agradecido de antemano.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

¿Y por casualidad dispone usted de una fotografía de la arqueta de piedra donde reposan los restos del célebre Don Juan Manuel, nieto de Fernando III el Santo, que está colocada en el presbiterio del convento de San Pablo de Peñafiel?--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Estimado señor: no poseo ninguna de las dos fotos. Sin embargo, en Commons ha está subido un pic de la arqueta de Don Juan Manuel: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Valladolid_Pe%C3%B1afiel_arqueta_piedra_infante_Juan_Manuel_ni.jpg . Saludos cordiales.--Zarateman (talk) 07:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Fotografías subidas a la FerropediaEdit

Fotografías tuyas subidas a la Ferropedia:

Un saludo.--JT Curses (talk) 07:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013Edit

Hola, com va tot? Et contactem per convidar-te a participar en l'edició d'enguany de Wiki Loves Monuments. Com sabràs, comença el proper diumenge dia 1 i s'allargarà tot el mes de setembre. Ens agradaria molt poder comptar de nou amb la teva participació. Pots llegir més sobre el concurs a Wikilovesmonuments.cat Sort! --Judesba (talk) 23:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Centro Ataria y balsas de Salburua 32.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vitoria - Centro Ataria y balsas de Salburua 32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:EuskoTran_(Bilbao)Edit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:EuskoTran_(Bilbao) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Laukatu (talk) 22:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0568.JPGEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0568.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wilfredor (talk) 18:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0567.JPGEdit

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vitoria - Graffiti & Murals 0567.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wilfredor (talk) 18:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 15:14, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 15:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Triforiums in SpainEdit

He propuesto el traslado de Category:Triforiums in Spain a «Triforia in Spain». Dame tu opinión. --DPC (talk) 08:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Pues que me parece un traslado perfectamente lógico y pertinente. Triforia es la declinación correcta en latín. Yo lo haría sin más.--Zarateman (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

OvercategorizationEdit

Why are you doing this? Discuss please! It's absolutely unnecessary to categorize every single image (specially since you're doing it only on the ones taken by a single user) in the mother category. I'll revert and report you if you keep doing it without discussion. Thank you. José Luiz disc 01:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm warning you once again. Stop trying to overcategorize YOUR images only without discussion. I watch every single one of my edits so don't bother trying to avoid this discussion. I'll revert you every single time until you spend some time discussing it. José Luiz disc 02:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. You categorize a chapel under altar pieces and under church sculptures. Why? They are different concepts and hierarchies. A chapel is a building, a piece of architecture. Altars and sculptures are not architectural elements but mobiliary, furniture, etc. Explain your criteria, please.--Zarateman (talk) 02:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I'm glad you decided to discuss. Let's go to the beginning. A chapel is broad term that covers not only smaller worships buildings but also the side chapels in a big church, basilica or cathedral. In the chapels you can find sculptures, altars, altarpieces and paintings. Until we can identify correctly each chapel (see here for an example]]), the main cat is the "chapels" or "side chapels", because that helps guys like me to properly identify them later in the future. But my main issue against the edits you made is not that. I'm concerned that you only categorized the images you donated and not the others, very similar to yours, something that can be seen as a tentative to give them more attention than the others. José Luiz disc 18:57, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
PS: remember that categories help us to not only identify "what" things are but also "where" they are. In this case, they are "in chapels" until we can identity "which" chapel is that. José Luiz disc 19:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Cat-a-lotEdit

Hi Zarateman, I see that you have moved a lot of images from Category:EuskoTran (Bilbao) to Category:Euskotren Tranbia (Bilbao). If I may give you some advice - using Commons:Cat-a-lot is quicker for such mass-moves than HotCat. I hope this helps you do these things more efficiently in the future. darkweasel94 23:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Merced calzada y descalzaEdit

Hola Zarateman, has hecho una redirección incorrecta sobre el convento de la Merced Calzada, que lo has llamado descalza. En Valladolid hubo dos de esa orden, los descalzos y los calzados. Los calzados son los que interesan ahora. ¿Lo podrías arreglar? Gracias Lourdes (talk) 18:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Esta es la página [9] Lourdes (talk) 18:07, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Ya he devuelto las imágenes a la categoría correcta. En esta, esta y esta se puede leer el nombre "calzada". Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Otra metedura de pataEdit

Te has cargado la categoría https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Churches_of_San_Juli%C3%A1n_and_Basilisa_and_San_Miguel,_Valladolid, que no tiene nada que ver con la que has puesto de redirección. ¿Podrías preguntar antes de de hacer las cosas? Gracias Lourdes (talk) 16:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Mis excusas por tan execrable error. He categorizado los contenidos de la categoría improcedentemente borrada bajo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Churches_of_San_Miguel,_and_San_Juli%C3%A1n_and_Santa_Basilisa,_Valladolid, a su vez dentro de http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Church_of_San_Miguel_and_San_Juli%C3%A1n,_Valladolid . --Zarateman (talk) 01:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

GraciasEdit

No sabes los sudores que me dieron cuando lo vi porque no sólo hay arte sino casas construidas en los solares de las iglesias desaparecidas y tenía que irlo buscando una a una... en fin, un trabajón. Ya está todo en orden y te lo agradezco. Lourdes (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Cambios de nombre de categoríasEdit

Creo que estás renombrando un montón de categorías sin discusión y sin una norma que lo respalde y ademàs dejando los nombres diferentes a otras categorías parecidas del mismo sitio, como ya te comenté sin respuesta en Category talk:Església de Sant Pere, Lleida. Estos cambios necesitarían un consenso previo que no he visto en ninguna parte.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Araia 05.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Araia 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grandiose (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Iglesia de Santa María de BadalonaEdit

Hola Zarateman. He visto que has publicado nuevas fotografías de esta iglesia de Badalona. Precisamente estaba revisando el articulo en la viquipèdia (versión en catalán) y me ha sorprendido ver nuevas fotos, así que gracias, servirá para ilustrar el articulo! Por otro lado, he visto que has hecho cambios en las categorías, por mi parte ningún problema, aunque ninguna de las dos formas inducia a confusión; la única categoria que no me queda clara es la de construida en 1940, puesto que esta iglesia se construyó en el siglo XVIII, concretamente inaugurada en 1778, lo que sí se completó en 1940 fue la reconstrucción y restauración de las destrucciones de la Guerra Civil, que a pesar de haberla dejado prácticamente en ruinas, el edificio no se hizo totalmente de nuevo. A parte, lo único que me gustaría comentarte es que en la descripción, al menos en las capillas y estatuas, hubiese un poco más de información, al menos qué es la imagen, a pesar que he visto que esa información está en la categoría de la foto (por ejemplo la estatua de San Sebastián), creo que estaría bien que esto estuviera contemplado en la descripción de la imagen. Saludos i de nuevo gracias por la aportación.--Sorenike (talk) 17:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hola, gracias por tus comentarios. Sigo tu consejo y voy a ampliar en la medida de lo que conozco las descripciones individuales de las fotos. He añadido también un enlace al artículo del templo en la Viquipèdia. Subí en total 84 fotos de edificios emblemáticos y paisaje urbano de Badalona, así que quizá encuentres en la categoría de la ciudad otros pics de interés para ilustrar tus proyectos wikipédicos. Saludos cordiales, --Zarateman (talk) 21:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)