User talk:Zhuyifei1999

Return to "Zhuyifei1999" page.


This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at

This is the user talk page of Zhuyifei1999, where you can send messages and comments to Zhuyifei1999.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | русский | +/−

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.

Flickrreview suggestionEdit

Bot should check the Source field first for gathering the Flickr link, no the first Flickr link presented on the description page (the latter should only be the fallback option). See [1] - multiple flickr links in description cause the review to fail as Bot picked the first link, not the valid Source link. --Denniss (talk) 10:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I lack the time of doing that atm. I'll do that when Panoramio Review Bot is done, or anyone can provide a fix for that in source. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for continuing your work. I have a nother suggestion: File:Mgr Fellay Écône (02).JPG was uploaded by a blacklisted Flick account, Review Bot couldn't determine copyright status and did not check further for the Blacklist, maybe the Blacklist check could be done earlier. --Denniss (talk) 19:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Will do this Friday or after Panoramio Review Bot (the sooner one) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
If you have time please take a look at handling/detecting ARR and NC/ND images, working through the human review cat I had several images marked as such instead of unfree. --Denniss (talk) 08:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


  1. Link detection (fixed in
    1. Multiple source ✓ Done --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
    2. Source site = * ✓ Done --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
  2. Blacklist check ✓ Done (example[need manual PD check]) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

@Denniss: Any more bugs? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Seems fine at the moment. Thanks for your work. --Denniss (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


Hi! I saw you added bare=1 in Creator:José María Romero López. What does it do? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

See Template:Authority_control/doc#Template_parameters ("bare=1" will show only links without top line or the box. This option is used in {{creator}} to display authority data.) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


heya, do you still use IRC? Wanted to discuss something with you. Cheers, russavia (talk) 02:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Coming --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-14Edit

09:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

FlickreviewR 2 (talk · contribs) bug reportEdit

Hi, your bot is tagging files with FlickreviewR (talk · contribs)'s templates, which means it is leaving, for example, User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-nosource on files. This says that the file was reviewed by Bryan's bot, FlickreviewR, when in fact it was reviewed by your bot. Storkk (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Also, it's tagging strange files as Flickr files, for example File:Herpes.png (tagged as speedy, so it may be gone by the time you see this) has no Flickr source (source is It was categorized by the uploader into Category:Flickr review needed, however your bot should probably check that the file has a flickr source before attempting to review. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 16:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
This is clearly the intended behavior: if it detects a flickrreview template but no Flickr link, then it tags it with such a red template. That's not a bug. darkweasel94 17:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Well maybe, but the bot is saying two things: "This image was initially posted to Flickr" and "this image was reviewed by FlickreviewR". Both of these things are incorrect and can cause knock-on issues (they did to me on that file, which is why I reported this here). Storkk (talk) 07:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Either way, maybe those templates should be copied over to User:FlickreviewR 2's userspace and changed... or perhaps they should just be changed to have ~~~ in them instead of a hardcoded username. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 07:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
I see no need in creating another subset of review templates, on the old Bot's userpage it's clearly stated this Bot is inactive and task taken over by version 2. Changing the template to four tildes would most likely break existing uses. And the misplacing of flickreview tamplates on non-Flickr images is in most cases user error in the upload form where they originally ticked 'Flickr image' but entered something else. --Denniss (talk) 07:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
What about changing the text to ""This image was claimed to be initially posted to Flickr" " for "source not found" cases? Jee 08:12, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
How about "This image was tagged as a Flickr-sourced image, but when reviewed by FlickreviewR or FlickreviewR 2, no source could be found" (potentially with a parameter that would default to FlickreviewR (so as not to break legacy tags) but FlickrevierR 2 could set)? I think the main issue is FlickreviewR 2 should not be tagging files as reviewed by FlickreviewR, and linking to the defunct bot's page. Storkk (talk) 09:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
I think Flickreview templates should be moved to a template namespace and the name of the bot that was used can be passed to the template as one of the parameters. --Jarekt (talk) 11:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Agree but that will break scripts and possibly some bots. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 12:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
We could always leave redirects, default values, etc. So the change could be done gradually. May be move them with while leaving redirects, than change redirects to template calls with the filled bot name. Than suggest to bot operators to update their code, so the new files do not have to rely on usernamespace templates. Afterwards we could, but probably do not have to change templates in the old files. --Jarekt (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

FlickreviewR Issue/Problem - Help!Edit


I uploaded some images today and posted the sources but later I received this message.

"This image was originally posted to Flickr by at It has been reviewed on 2014-04-02 19:56:33 by FlickreviewR, which could not determine what the source image from Flickr was."

(1) What I uploaded:

This is the source for the images I posted.


Author: - Christopher Macsurak

(2)What I uploaded:


Author: - Christopher Macsurak

Both images are:

Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work Under the following conditions: attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

I would really appreciate the help.--Friendlypete2014 (talk) 18:20, 02 April 2014 (EST)

Please always link to the standard photo website, not the mobile variant as the syntax used by mobile Flickr may cause the Bot to malfunction. In the first case the correct link is . Please redo the second image, it isn't cropped from the highest res version and has a hell lot of compression artifacts.--Denniss (talk) 08:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Review datesEdit

Hi. Could you please use localizable ISO dates for Picasa review bot too. Thanks! 07:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

You mean for every translations of {{picasareview}}, display the date in its own language? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes. I mean use timestamp "2014-04-05" instead of "5 April 2014". 08:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
It's already using ISO date, just like Flickrreview bot. Just many old review tags are not using it. --Denniss (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:22, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Panoramio ReviewEdit

I notice that the panoramio review category has grown to 425+ images. If your bot is ready, you can test it on some images.

PS: I intentionally uploaded an 'ARR' image below for your panoramio review bot to test when it is ready. It should fail the image. I made a statement in the image's talkpage. Once your bot fails the image, please speedy delete the image:

  • File:Malacca River cruise (2009cr).jpg

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: The panoramio category was 430 images but now I see its 401 images. Perhaps someone marked some of the images but it wasn't me. Goodbye, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes. It was this Admin here who marked a few images. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
The bot is just waiting for a 'crat's approval (tested on 9 images, see Commons:Bots/Requests/Panoramio Review Bot). After it's approved (maybe just 3 more days), the bot will be running. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-15Edit

08:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-16Edit

07:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Last modified on 14 April 2014, at 07:18