Category talk:Montgomery Shoshone Mine in Rhyolite, Nevada

Proposed Rename

Oppose

I don't really care what style we use for the naming convention, as long as it's clear, logical, unambiguous, & lends itself well to hierarchical organization. quite frankly the filing system on WMC in general is a godawful mess.

one problem with the proposed rename: there was more than one mine in (the area of) rhyolite, nv. i have images for at least 2 different mines so far, & i expect more will turn up, sooner or later. whatever naming convention we use here needs to be able to handle the concept of:

rhyolite,nv > mines in the rhyolite nv area > the montgomery shoshone mine

a naming system that can't do that is inadequate; which is why i'm oposing the name change, on the basis of the exact wording, as suggested. if we rename, the naming structure needs to be better thought out.

Lx 121 (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

also: the mine wasn't technically "IN" rhyolite, nv.; more like in the general area Lx 121 (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)