Open main menu

Commons:Кандидаты в ценные изображения

This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status, and image sets for valued image set (VIS) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

Как номинировать изображение или набор изображений на получение статуса «ценного»Edit

Кандидатуры будет оцениваться с использованием критериев, перечисленных на странице Признаки ценных изображений Пожалуйста, прочитайте эти критерии перед номинацией изображения, чтобы среди кандидатов было меньше тех, что имеют мало шансов на успех. Убедитесь, что вы понимаете концепцию предметной области и выбрали правильную предметную область для своего изображения.


Пожалуйста, убедитесь, что предлагаемое вами изображение соответствует всем необходимым критериям до его выдвижения. Например, если нужен шаблон {{Location}}, то он должен быть поставлен заранее (студийные работы можно пометить шаблоном {{Studio work}}). Если нет соответствующих категорий, то создайте их заранее перед номинацией. Хотя некоторые отзывы могут помочь устранить погрешности, это ваша ответственность, как номинатора оформить ваше изображение до того, как предоставить его на рассмотрение. Если вы предложили изображение, которое игнорирует один из критериев, не удивляйтесь, если оно не получит статуса ценного изображения.

Adding a new nomination (image)Edit

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list, (under the heading "New valued image nominations") as the last parameter in the VICs template: Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Adding a new nomination (set)Edit

Step 1: Choose a set name, and type that into this box after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname. Then click on the "Create new set nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VISC subpage.

Step 3: Open Commons:Valued image candidates/Set candidate list Click here, and add your set at at the bottom of the page using this format:

 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/A vulca......
 {{Commons:Valued image candidates/Mysetname}}

and save the set candidate list.

Повторная номинацияEdit

Отклоненные кандидаты в качественные изображения и наборы могут быть повторно выдвинуты любым зарегистрированным участником только после того как одна или несколько основных причин, из-за которых изображение было отклонено будут исправлены. Undecided кандидаты в качественные изображения и наборы могут быть повторно выдвинуты в том же состоянии, хотя рекомендуется рассмотреть и исправить причины, которые, возможно, помешали получению статуса во время предыдущей номинации.

После того, как проблемы исправлены нужно выполнить следующую процедуру повторной номинации:

Шаг 1: Отредактируйте подстраницу кандидата, которого Вы повторно номинировать. Отклоненные заявки находятся в категории [[:Category:Declined valued image candidates}, а заявки, по которым не было принято решение в категории Category:Undecided valued image candidates. Страницы в этих категориях отсортированы по дате предыдущей номинации.

Шаг 2: Замените предыдущие дату и время номинации новыми. Для этого нужно вставить строку

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Шаг 3: Замените статус "undecided" или "declined" на "nominated" (или "discussed", если изображение добавляется в раздел Most Valued Review).

Шаг 4: Если предыдущую номинацию делал другой участник, то нужно заменить имя номинатора. Для этого нужно вставить строку

|nominator=~~~

Шаг 5: Если у кандидата до этого не было архивной ссылки на предыдущее обсуждение, то ещё можно сделать следующим способом:

  • Вырезать текст в предыдущей секции "review section" (нужно оставить закрывающие фигурные скобки "]]")
  • Заменить параметр "review" строкой
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Сохранить страницу
  • Появится красная ссылка на предыдущую номинацию. Кликните на ней и вставьте предыдущий обзор
  • Сохраните эту подстраницу

Шаг 6: Добавить подстраницу в список кандидатов

How to open a Most Valued ReviewEdit

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidatesEdit

How to review an imageEdit

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedureEdit

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review periodEdit

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidatesEdit

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
36,248 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
32,386 (89.3%) 
Undecided
  
1,794 (4.9%) 
Declined
  
2,068 (5.7%) 



New valued image nominationsEdit

   
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2019-09-10 11:39 (UTC)
Scope:
German version of Vespa 150 Sprint, front and left side
Used in:
de: Vespa 150 Sprint, fr: Vespa Sprint et Sprint Veloce
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
D-Kuru (talk) on 2019-09-12 12:27 (UTC)
Scope:
SO-DIMM DDR RAM slot
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
D-Kuru (talk) on 2019-09-12 12:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Sapphire Radeon HD 5870
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Fluffy89502 ~ talk on 2019-09-12 16:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Gavin Newsom
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Naisq (talk) on 2019-07-09 22:15 (UTC)
Scope:
...
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-13 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Coequosa australasiae mounted specimen male dorsal
  •   Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-13 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Facade of Ca'da Mosto on campiello del Leon Bianco in Venice
  •   Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-13 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Beaux-Arts de Carcassonne - Lisière d'oasis (1866) - Victor Huguet
  •   Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-09-13 20:03 (UTC)
Scope:
The Riverview, Birkenhead
Used in:
Listed buildings in Birkenhead
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-09-13 20:02 (UTC)
Scope:
The Copperfield, Birkenhead
Used in:
LIverpol buildings in BIrkenhead
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-09-13 20:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Tate plaque, 42 - 44 Hamilton Street, Birkenhead - cropped
Used in:
List of commemorative plaques in Merseyside
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-14 04:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Coequosa australasiae male ventral
  •   Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-14 04:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Giustina Donà dalle Rose in Ca' Rezzonico, Venice
  •   Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-14 04:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Eugène Poubelle by Denys Puech, Musée des Beaux-Arts de Carcassonne
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2019-09-14 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Vaxholm Castle, interior courtyard
Used in:
en:Vaxholm Fortress, wikidata:Q2627611
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2019-09-14 12:53 (UTC)
Scope:
De Rotterdam - detail of facade as seen from SW
Used in:
en:De Rotterdam
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
D-Kuru (talk) on 2019-09-14 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Mini PCI slot
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-15 05:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Erinnyis impunctata mounted specimen female dorsal
  •   Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-15 05:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Ligardes, Gers, France - The war memorial of the First World War
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-15 05:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Ca' Rezzonico - Ragazzo con mela - Antonio Marinetti.jpg
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-09-15 19:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Wavertree lockup - front (from the south)
Used in:
Wikidata:Q30332103, Wavertree Lock-up
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-09-15 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Christ Church, Bootle
Used in:
Wikidata:Q26572479
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
D-Kuru (talk) on 2019-09-15 22:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Razer Arctosa
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
D-Kuru (talk) on 2019-09-15 22:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Razer Ornata Chroma
Open for review.
 
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-16 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Erinnyis impunctata mounted specimen female ventral
  •   Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-16 05:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Ligardes, Gers, France - Fortified Church of Saint Hilaire XIV - South exposure
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2019-09-16 05:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Conjugal Concorde crowned by Virtue in the presence of Justice, Prudence, Temperance, Fame, Abundance by Costantino Cedini - Ca' Rezzonico (Venice) - Parlor Room
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2019-09-16 09:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Limenitis reducta (Southern white admiral) underside
Open for review.
 
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basile Morin (talk) on 2019-09-16 10:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Wat Phra Kaew, front view
Used in:
en:Wat Phra Kaew
Open for review.


Pending valued image set candidatesEdit

  This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.