Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

Commons:Administratorët

Commons Administrator.svg

Të drejtat e administrimit ju jepen përdoruesve të besuar, që në projektin Commons si dhe në projektet tjera kanë dëshmuar se i njohin dhe respektojnë rregullat në fuqi të projektit Wikimedia Commons. Në asnjë mënyrë nuk do të thotë kjo se administratorët mund të vendosin për projektin.


Tani për tani vlen kjo rregullore për administratorët.

Administratori është një përdoruesi i besueshëm që ka këto të drejta:

  • Mbrojtjen e faqeve të projektit nga redaktimi si dhe lirimin për redaktim të faqeve.
  • Grisjen e faqeve të projektit si dhe rivendosjen e faqes në projekt.
  • Grisjen e fotografive dhe skedave të tjera të bartura nga përdoruesit.
  • Bllokimin dhe çbllokimin e përdorimit të projektit nga përdoruesit.
  • Ndryshimin e parapamjes apo të faqeve të mbrojtura (p.sh.m.: ndryshimin e faqes kryesore)

Sejili nga ju ka mundësi të propozojë ndonjë përdorues si adminisrator, për këtë duhen pasur parasysh këto kritere:

  • Nuk jeni përdorues aq i ri në projektet Wikimedia. Keni qenë aktiv së paku dy muajt e fundit në projektin Commons dhe pranoni se i mbështetni qëllimet e projektit.
  • Keni një faqe personale dhe së paku keni ngarkuar 100 skeda (fotografi, tekste apo zë të regjistruar)
  • Keni punuar sipas rregullave themelore dhe keni respektuar votimet e përdoruesve të komunitetit në këtë projekt.
  • Përdoruesit e tjerë duhet t'ju pranojnë që ju do të jeni një administrator i zoti.

Përzgjedha zgjat zakonisht shtatë ditë. Të drejtat e administrimit lëshohen pasi të keni marrë së paku katër vota nga të cilat 75% duhet të jenë "PËR". Në rast të arritjes së 75% duhet njoftuar ndonjëri nga byrokratët për rezultatin, të cilin edhe do ta vlerësojnë.

Sipas rregullores së projektit "Meta për administratorë pasivë", e drejta previlegjeve mund të tërhiqet.

Vini Re!: Nuk është e thënë zotërimi i plotë i shkrimit të gjuhës angleze, edhe pse ai është i mirëpritur. Kryesorja është kontributi dhe aftësia e komunikimit me anë të së cilës arrihet fitimi i besushmërisë së komunitetit. Si do që të jetë, në pjesën e më poshtme për shkaqe teknike kërkesa bëhet në gjuhën angleze dhe shpjegimet e mëposhtme janë po në këtë gjuhë. Fat të mbarë!

Kërkesa për të drejtë administrimiEdit

Krijo një nën-faqe: Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username me tekstin e mëposhtëm në gjuhën angleze:

==[[User:Username|Username]]==
{{custom edit|Template:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username|text='''Vote'''}}

Reasons why you think you should be an admin. ~~~~

===Votes===

dhe radhite në faqen: Administrators/Requests and votes.

Administrators as of October 2017 [+/−]
Listing by language
Listing by date
Listing by activity

Number of Admins: 233

  1. -revi, ko, en-3 (global renamer)
  2. ~riley, en, fr-1, es-1
  3. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  4. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  5. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  6. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  7. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  8. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  9. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 (global renamer)
  10. Aka, de, en-3
  11. Alan, es, eu-3, en-2
  12. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  13. Amada44, de, en-3, fr-1
  14. Angr, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  15. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  16. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  17. Anthere, fr, en-3
  18. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  19. AzaToth, sv, en-4
  20. Badseed, el, en-3, it-1
  21. Barcex, es, en-2, fr-1
  22. Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, ga-1
  23. Basvb, nl, en-3, de-2
  24. Benoit Rochon fr, en-4
  25. Billinghurst, en
  26. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  27. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  28. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  29. Cambalachero, es, en-3
  30. Captain-tucker, en
  31. ChrisiPK, de, en-3, fr-1
  32. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-3, es-1
  33. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  34. Common Good, en
  35. Cookie, es, en-2
  36. Courcelles, en, es-2, fr-2
  37. Czar, en
  38. DaB., de, en-1
  39. Dantadd, it, pt, en-3, es-3, fr-3, gl-3, ca-2, ro-1, el-1
  40. DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  41. Davepape, en
  42. David Levy, en
  43. De728631, de, en-5
  44. Dereckson, fr, en-3, de-1, nl-1
  45. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  46. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  47. DMacks, en
  48. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  49. Dschwen, de, en-3, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  50. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  51. Ebrahim, fa
  52. Edgar181, en, de-1, fr-1, es-1
  53. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  54. Eleassar, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  55. Elitre, it, en-3, fr-2
  56. Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
  57. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  58. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 (global renamer)
  59. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  60. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  61. Fanghong, zh, en-2, fr-1
  62. Flominator, de, als, en-3
  63. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  64. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  65. Geni, en
  66. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  67. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  68. Gnangarra, en
  69. Golbez, en, ja-2
  70. Green Giant, en, de-1, fr-1
  71. grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  72. Gruznov, ru, en-1, fr-1
  73. Guanaco, en, es-1
  74. Hedwig in Washington, de, en-4, nds-1
  75. Hekerui, de, en-4
  76. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  77. Hesperian, en
  78. HJ Mitchell, en
  79. Howcheng, en, ja-2
  80. Huntster, en
  81. Hystrix, de, en-1
  82. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  83. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  84. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  85. January, en
  86. Jaqen, it, en-2
  87. Jarekt, pl, en
  88. JarrahTree, en, id-1
  89. Jastrow, fr, en-3, ro-2, de-1, it-1
  90. Jcb, nl, en-3, es-3
  91. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  92. Jdforrester, en
  93. Jdx, pl
  94. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  95. JGHowes, en, fr-2, de-1
  96. Jianhui67, en, zh-3, ms-1 (global renamer)
  97. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  98. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  99. John Vandenberg, en
  100. Josve05a, sv, en-3
  101. Juliancolton, en
  102. Julo, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  103. JuTa, de, en-2, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  104. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-1, ko-1
  105. Kaldari, en
  106. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  107. Kelly, en
  108. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
  109. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  110. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  111. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  112. KTo288, en, zh-4
  113. Kwj2772, ko, en-2
  114. Leit, de, en-3, fr-1
  115. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  116. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  117. Lokal Profil, sv, en-4, pt-2, fr-1
  118. Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  119. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 (checkuser)
  120. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 (global renamer)
  121. Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
  122. Mardetanha fa, az, en-3, tr-2, ar-1 (steward)
  123. Martin H., de, en-2
  124. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  125. Matanya, en, he (steward)
  126. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  127. Mates, cs, en-3, sk-4, de-1
  128. Mattbuck, en, fr-1, la-1
  129. Maxim, ru, en-3, fr-2
  130. MBisanz, en (steward)
  131. McZusatz, de, en-3, es-1, la-1 swg-1
  132. Mentifisto, en, mt, it-2 (steward)
  133. MichaelMaggs, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  134. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  135. Missvain, en
  136. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  137. Miya, ja, en-2
  138. Mmxx, fa, en-3
  139. Moheen Reeyad, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
  140. Mono, en
  141. Morgankevinj, en, es-1, la-1
  142. Mormegil, cs, en-2, de-1
  143. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  144. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  145. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 (global renamer)
  146. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  147. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1
  148. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  149. Neozoon, de, en-4, nl-4, fr-2
  150. Nick, en, sco-2, fr-1
  151. Nilfanion, en, fr-1
  152. NordNordWest, de, en-3
  153. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  154. Nyttend, en, ang-1
  155. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  156. Otourly, fr, en-2, it-1
  157. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  158. Perhelion, de, en-3
  159. Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
  160. PierreSelim, fr, en-3, es-1 (oversighter)
  161. Pitke, fi, en-4, sv-2
  162. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  163. Pleclown, fr, en-3
  164. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  165. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  166. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  167. PumpkinSky, en, de-2
  168. Putnik, ru, en-2
  169. Pyb, fr, en-2
  170. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  171. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  172. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  173. Rama, fr, en-3, de-2, la-2, es-1, it-1, ja-1 (oversighter)
  174. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  175. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  176. Rehman, en, si-1
  177. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  178. Revent, en (oversighter)
  179. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  180. Rodhullandemu, en, fr-1, de-1, sv-1
  181. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  182. Ronhjones, en, fr-1
  183. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  184. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  185. RP88, en, de-1
  186. Rubin16, ru, tt, en-3 (global renamer)
  187. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  188. Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
  189. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  190. Sealle, ru, en-4, pl-2, sk-2, uk-2
  191. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  192. Sphilbrick, en
  193. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  194. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  195. Srittau, de, en-3
  196. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 (global renamer)
  197. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  198. Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
  199. Tabercil, en
  200. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  201. Tarawneh, en, ar, de-1
  202. Techman224, en
  203. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 (steward)
  204. Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
  205. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-2
  206. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  207. Trijnstel, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 (checkuser, steward)
  208. tsca, pl, en, da
  209. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  210. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  211. Waldir, pt, en-3
  212. Wdwd, de, en-2
  213. Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
  214. Whym, ja, en-2
  215. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, as-2, bpy-1
  216. WJBscribe, en, fr-3, de-1 (global renamer)
  217. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  218. Wuzur, de, en-3
  219. wvk, de, en-4, fa-3, fr-2
  220. Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
  221. Yarl, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  222. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  223. Y.haruo, ja, en-1
  224. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  225. Yuval Y, he, en-3
  226. Zhuyifei1999‎, zh, en-4
  227. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  228. とある白い猫, en, tr, az-3, ja-2, fr-1, nl-1
  229. CommonsDelinker, (bot)
  230. CommonsMaintenanceBot, (bot) see request
  231. Embedded Data Bot, (bot) see request
  232. GifTagger, (bot) see request
  233. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

The system currently recognizes 233 administrators. If that is not the last number in the list above, there is an error in the list.

Shortcut
COM:VOTE
This project page in other languages:

This is the requests and votes page, a centralized place where you can keep track of ongoing user requests, and where you can comment and leave your vote. Any user is welcome to comment on these requests, and any logged in user is welcome to vote.

When requesting rights that do not need the support of the community (e.g. filemover) please go to Commons:Requests for rights!

How and where to apply for additional user rights on CommonsEdit

How to comment and voteEdit

Any logged-in user is welcome to vote and to comment on the requests below. Votes from unregistered users are not counted, but comments may still be made. If the nomination is successful, a bureaucrat will grant the relevant rights. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Among other things, the closing bureaucrat may take into account the strength of any arguments presented and the experience and knowledge of the commenting users. For example, the comments and votes of users who have zero or few contributions on Commons may at the bureaucrat's discretion be discounted.

It is preferable if you give reasons both for   Support votes or   Oppose ones as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.

Purge the cache. Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.

Requests for Oversight rightsEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rightsEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for bureaucratshipEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for adminshipEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.


Requests for license reviewer rightsEdit

No current requests.


Requests for permission to run a botEdit

Before making a bot request, please read the new version of the Commons:Bots page. Read Commons:Bots#Information on bots and make sure you have added the required details to the bot's page. A good example can be found here.

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bots/Archive.

Any user may comment on the merits of the request to run a bot. Please give reasons, as that makes it easier for the closing bureaucrat. Read Commons:Bots before commenting.

Geograph Update Bot (talk · contribs) (locations)Edit

Operator: Bjh21 (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Adding and amending geocoding templates on files from Geograph projects.

Automatic or manually assisted: automatic, unsupervised

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One-time run initially, thereafter every few months or when I find a new kind of problem.

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 12 edits per minute

Programming language(s): Python with pywikibot

This is an addition to Geograph Update Bot's existing authorisation.

There's more detail of what the bot will do at User:Geograph Update Bot#Location correction. Initially, it will be fixing co-ordinates supplied by GeographBot, as discussed long ago at Commons:Batch uploading/Geograph#Imprecise Geotags. Later I'd like to tackle Geograph images that have never had a location and those with location but no heading. The task description above is intended to cover all of these and more.

As presently coded, the bot will not edit pages if the change of location is small, but this loses the opportunity to record the source and precision, so I'd be quite open to overwriting all of GeographBot's locations if that were desired. That would increase the number of edits from a few hundred thousand to about 1,700,000.

I'll start a test run in a few hours.

--bjh21 (talk) 16:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Test run complete. See Special:Contributions/Geograph Update Bot. Note that the first few edits are unrepresentative as I debugged the edit-constructing code. --bjh21 (talk) 19:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

A small note: I've decided that adding source and precision is worthwhile even when the actual co-ordinates don't change by much. The bot will tag such changes as minor edits. --bjh21 (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

It occurs to me that people involved in the 2010 discussion may have opinions. @Multichill:, @ClemRutter:, and @Nilfanion: are all still active on Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 10:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Is it possible that some of the photographs show a subset of the actual location and already contain precise location data (perhaps manually corrected), so that updating to the defined coordinates of the general object will worsen the situation? (I ran into such situations when updating coordinates of Austrian monuments.) Maybe the bot should check the file page history for possible manual edits which are not categorization only and skip these files? I know this improves complexity a lot, but it may save some mistakes that are not detected otherwise. Thoughts? --Krd 07:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
    I think you may have misunderstood precisely what I'm planning. I'm going to be updating the camera co-ordinates (mostly: see next paragraph). The new co-ordinates will be based on the camera co-ordinates for the same picture on Geograph Britain and Ireland, which is where both the pictures and the existing co-ordinates came from. To handle cases where the co-ordinates have been updated since upload, I compare the {{location dec}} template in the latest revision of the page to the one in the first revision, and check that the first revision was generated by User:GeographBot. That should mean that I leave alone any page where the co-ordinates have been changed by hand.
    There is one occasion where I plan to add {{object location}}, and that's when I can't derive a decent camera location from the Geograph database. Your question has made me realise that I need to avoid doing this where there is already an {{object location}} recorded for a picture. In that case, I think I should just delete the GeographBot-derived {{location dec}}. --bjh21 (talk) 11:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
    Ok, understood. I think the task should be approved. --Krd 16:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Looks OK for me. --Jarekt (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please record both camera and subject location when available (via appropriate use of {{object location}}). The location of the object is more significant for categorisation than the camera.--Nilfanion (talk) 09:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
    The documentation for {{object location}} implies that only one of it and {{location}} should be used on a file. It says, “For files, camera {{Location}}s are preferred,” and “if you know the camera location ... , use the camera location tag instead.” (my emphasis). Bots should embody best practices, so while the guidance discourages the use of both templates on a file, I think my bot should follow that. If the guidance is updated, the bot's behaviour can change. --bjh21 (talk) 11:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
I wrote that section and that is not how I meant it. Having both {{object location}} and {{location}} is is fine. I agree with Nilfanion that it would be nice to have both and if Geograph data have both I would preserve it. Otherwise if they do not have it, I would not worry about it, as that would be manual job, anybody (with infinite amount of time and patience) can do. It is not a job for a bot and that is what we discuses here. --Jarekt (talk) 11:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
OK; that's almost as good as a documentation update. I'll have the bot include both where possible. --bjh21 (talk) 12:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Also, could you clarify what value is being used for the camera location? Consider these four examples (all for same 6-figure subject location).
Geograph's primary focus is on the subject not the camera, and the displayed information on Geograph may be less than that recorded internally. This can be seen on the preview maps, as the 4 camera locations are subtly different. How would your bot handle these 4 images?--Nilfanion (talk) 09:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
I've added those to the samples on User:Geograph Update Bot. Note that I've not yet applied the change to generate both templates, so each one only gets one for now.
The bot always works from the full-precision grid reference in the Geograph database, but when use6fig is set it sets the prec parameter to "100". --bjh21 (talk) 14:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

ProméthéeBot (talk · contribs)Edit

Operator: Prométhée (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: This bot work on fr.wikipedia (more than 114 000 edits)

  • work on category (in particular those on the French army)
  • other task on request

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): on operator demand

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): various

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): javscript, AWB and Pywikibot

Prométhée (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

Please make edit summaries similar to MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js.
I think will be good idea to use English there.
Please ask request for other task separately.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
I change my script in order to use English. Prométhée (talk) 17:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Please make another small test run. --Krd 06:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, see today : Contributions. Other exemples : I do similar edits on wikipedia.fr. Prométhée (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
You could omit bot name from edit summaries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Valerio Bozzolan bot (talk · contribs)Edit

Operator: Valerio Bozzolan (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought:

  1. On files listed in the Category:Pictures of volleyball players from Legavolley (2017), descriptions will be uniformed to a more consistent «[Name] [Surname], [italian] volleyball player» (+ italian) instead of only something in italian (  «Immagine del giocatore di Lega Pallavolo Serie A»). The personal player category is added to the file. (e.g. Special:Diff/263593147)
  2. If the personal volleyball category doesn't exist it will be created. It will be into the best national category available (e.g. in Category:Men's volleyball players from Australia) and, if possible, with the {{Wikidata person}}. (e.g. Special:Diff/263593150)

Automatic or manually assisted: manually assisted

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): daily (In spare time until task is done, you know)

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 4

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): Python (Pywikibot)

--Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

  • Please make a test run. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
    Special:Diff/261948756: example of player with a personal category
    Special:Diff/261949348: example of player without a personal category
    --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
    Seems OK for me, but I would like to suggest to also refer to Wikidata item (if exists) and try to fetch descriptions from there instead. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
    @EugeneZelenko: You mean copy-pasting the description from Wikidata? Or is there a template/module for that? (I've added a 2nd related task.) --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 11:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
    Sure, template with reference to Wikidata item is proper solution, but I'm not aware of such general one for person or just object. May be @Jarekt: could suggest? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
    If you mean the Template:On Wikidata in top of the page, I think that it's possible. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
      Question Should the bot avoid to create the personal category of the volleyball player if that personal category will contain only a single file? --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

I created a new template {{Wikidata person}} that adds a {{creator}} template and interwiki links based on Wikidata. It also adds Category:People by name and birthyear/deathyear categories. Maybe something like that would be useful here. I also think it is a good idea to create category even for a single person if it is a notable person. Notability is a tricky business, but for people category if you can imagine that someone might upload more pictures of a person that is good enough for me. --Jarekt (talk) 01:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

  Question Do you think that we should also add the DEFAULTSORT surname, name after that template? --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 10:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
yes, the Category:People by name and birthyear/deathyear categories will have proper sortkey, but it will be handy for other categories. --Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I found existing {{Depicted person}}, may be we could just extend its functionality to use Wikidata? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
That template is used in an individual file to list people depicted in the specific photograph. It has a different purpose. --Jarekt (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This is what this request is about as far as I could judge from test run. Of course, it may be widened. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
You are right. I got confused. This is about file descriptions not category descriptions. I think it might be a good idea to add categories for a lot of those guys but that might be outside of the scope of this request. --Jarekt (talk) 00:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
So, are these differences respecting your suggestions? file, cat --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 08:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
The diffs look good. The infobox would look better if you add "Country of citizenship" and "occupation" properties to the wikidata item. But that is just a detail. --Jarekt (talk) 11:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Good point, that would be the next bot proposal in Wikidata. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 12:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
TL;DR: We are ready :) Waiting for a kindly available bureaucrat. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
In Wikidata or Commons? Depicted person: doesn't support Wikidata yet :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons :) I will work in Wikidata when I end here. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Please make another test run, I'd say 50 or 100 edits. Thank you. --Krd 07:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

OK ~100 tests done. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 00:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks good for me. Additional opinions? --Krd 08:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
I still would like to see file automatic description generation based on Wikidata. --EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:|talk]]) 14:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: Can you share an example about that? --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 16:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
See templates based on {{Creator}}. As I wrote, Depicted person: is proper templates for photos of people and it should be expanded to support Wikidata. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
What about something as the new {{Depicted Wikidata people}}? Requests for comments in its discussion page. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Fructibot (talk · contribs)Edit

Operator: Fructibus (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Fill the categories like Category:Wrist clasps in the Portable Antiquities Scheme - Category:Buckles in the Portable Antiquities Scheme and then other tasks like these.

Automatic or manually assisted: manually assisted

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): continuous

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 12

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): None. Using AWB

Fructibus (talk) 23:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

  • Please make edit summaries similar to MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Sure, AWB is adding such detailed comments by default. I can make a few test edits if I get the bot flag, then wait for feedback. Fructibus (talk) 17:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
    You could make new test run without bot flag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: I can't log in on Commons, using AWB. It says "Fructibot is not enabled to use this" and then it opens this page in my browser, where it specifies: "Access - This list of users with AWB access is only for the Wikimedia Commons. Note that approval is not always needed on other projects, but it is for Commons." I tried to login in a few Wikipedia projects too (en, de fr, fa, hi), but it doesn't work. Fructibus (talk) 23:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  Done I added your bot account to Commons:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage#Approved users. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: Thank you! I've made several test edits, please take a look at them to check if their edit summaries are OK - Special:Contributions/Fructibot. Fructibus (talk) 12:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Please don't include section header, it doesn't make sense for categories. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: You are right! I was very irritated by that section header notice, I simply could not imagine that there's an option for that. I made a few edits more without section headers now. Fructibus (talk) 17:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks fine for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @EugeneZelenko: When you wrote "You could make new test run without bot flag" above 14:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC), did you mean for the user to do that with the user's account?   — Jeff G. ツ 13:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko, Krd, Odder: Could you approve the bot? It's already running happily. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Question: Why is that already running at full speed without bot flag? --Krd 06:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes why. It is flooding "newbie contributions"> Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:53, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
I have now blocked the bot. Operator doesn't appear to act responsible to me, running at full speed without bot flag and no response at the bot request page. Also the bot doesn't appear to run manually assisted as specified above, and does more the 12 edits per minute as specified above. --Krd 07:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I had no time for editing these days, now I came back. I thought I can already run the bot since I got the answer "looks fine". I had no idea that it doesn't have the bot flag yet, I'm not familiarized with the various levels of the approval procedure. Therefore I didn't check this page since I was thinking that the approval is done and the request is simply waiting for being archived. I came back now because I was intrigued why the request was not archived yet. I applied for "manually assisted" because I am using AWB and I noticed that AWB doesn't have the bot options as it did some years ago (IIRC). So I thought that manually I will make one edit every five seconds. Then when I started editing I was overwhelmed by the enormous amount of edits I had to do (thousands) and I thought it would be nice to do it faster. I think I should have asked here first. Then I realized that I can actually make the edits much faster, once every one or two seconds. Then I got the idea to use a program to automatically send keystrokes. Again, I should have asked, but I was afraid it will be refused, since AWB doesn't have bot options (or at least I can't find it) and I've set it at one edit every 2 seconds (30 per minute).

Sorry for the inconvenience. Can I apply again for a bot? If yes, then when? And is it possible to have an automatic bot? If yes, then is it allowed to use AWB for that (in conjunction with a keystroke program)? For the moment I am mainly focused on categorizing the items in the Category:Portable Antiquities Scheme, I think I did a decent job about it already. - Fructibus (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

I have now unblocked the bot. Please stop the task until this bot request is closed. I'm going to let this open for the moment as I think I should abstain from closing here, and I think there are still issues. --Krd 05:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Can I change the "Maximum edit rate" to 50 and or at least 30 and the "Automatic or manually assisted" parameter to automatic? Fructibus (talk) 06:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
I don't know if you technically can, because I don't know your system. As long as no bot flag has been applied, please stop the task completely. --Krd 06:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

KolbertBot (talk · contribs)Edit

Operator: Jon Kolbert (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Change selected URLs from using HTTP protocol to HTTPS to improve security. Bot is currently approved to operate on enwiki, frwiki, simplewiki and ruwiki.

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuous

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): Currently edits on other projects at around 10 edits/min, can be adjusted.

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): Pywikibot.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

  •   Support Seems as a net-possitive, strengthens security and privacy. Since it is already approved on e.g. enwp (whcih their high bar of ot flags), I dn't see a reason as to why not. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Please make some test edits. --Krd 07:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
    @Krd: Test edits done. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
    Looks good for me. Let's keep it on hold for a few days, just in case there are objections. --Krd 16:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • If bot code is same as in Russian Wikipedia, it's OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
    The code is exactly the same. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

If there are no objections, I think bot status should be granted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Requests for commentEdit