Commons:Administratorët

Commons Administrator.svg

Të drejtat e administrimit ju jepen përdoruesve të besuar, që në projektin Commons si dhe në projektet tjera kanë dëshmuar se i njohin dhe respektojnë rregullat në fuqi të projektit Wikimedia Commons. Në asnjë mënyrë nuk do të thotë kjo se administratorët mund të vendosin për projektin.


Tani për tani vlen kjo rregullore për administratorët.

Administratori është një përdoruesi i besueshëm që ka këto të drejta:

  • Mbrojtjen e faqeve të projektit nga redaktimi si dhe lirimin për redaktim të faqeve.
  • Grisjen e faqeve të projektit si dhe rivendosjen e faqes në projekt.
  • Grisjen e fotografive dhe skedave të tjera të bartura nga përdoruesit.
  • Bllokimin dhe çbllokimin e përdorimit të projektit nga përdoruesit.
  • Ndryshimin e parapamjes apo të faqeve të mbrojtura (p.sh.m.: ndryshimin e faqes kryesore)

Sejili nga ju ka mundësi të propozojë ndonjë përdorues si adminisrator, për këtë duhen pasur parasysh këto kritere:

  • Nuk jeni përdorues aq i ri në projektet Wikimedia. Keni qenë aktiv së paku dy muajt e fundit në projektin Commons dhe pranoni se i mbështetni qëllimet e projektit.
  • Keni një faqe personale dhe së paku keni ngarkuar 100 skeda (fotografi, tekste apo zë të regjistruar)
  • Keni punuar sipas rregullave themelore dhe keni respektuar votimet e përdoruesve të komunitetit në këtë projekt.
  • Përdoruesit e tjerë duhet t'ju pranojnë që ju do të jeni një administrator i zoti.

Përzgjedha zgjat zakonisht shtatë ditë. Të drejtat e administrimit lëshohen pasi të keni marrë së paku katër vota nga të cilat 75% duhet të jenë "PËR". Në rast të arritjes së 75% duhet njoftuar ndonjëri nga byrokratët për rezultatin, të cilin edhe do ta vlerësojnë.

Sipas rregullores së projektit "Meta për administratorë pasivë", e drejta previlegjeve mund të tërhiqet.

Vini Re!: Nuk është e thënë zotërimi i plotë i shkrimit të gjuhës angleze, edhe pse ai është i mirëpritur. Kryesorja është kontributi dhe aftësia e komunikimit me anë të së cilës arrihet fitimi i besushmërisë së komunitetit. Si do që të jetë, në pjesën e më poshtme për shkaqe teknike kërkesa bëhet në gjuhën angleze dhe shpjegimet e mëposhtme janë po në këtë gjuhë. Fat të mbarë!

Kërkesa për të drejtë administrimiEdit

Krijo një nën-faqe: Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username me tekstin e mëposhtëm në gjuhën angleze:

==[[User:Username|Username]]==
{{custom edit|Template:Administrators/Requests and votes/Username|text='''Vote'''}}

Reasons why you think you should be an admin. ~~~~

===Votes===

dhe radhite në faqen: Administrators/Requests and votes.

Administrators as of May 2016 [+/−]
Listing by language
Listing by date
Listing by activity

Number of Admins: 244

  1. -revi, ko, en-3
  2. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  3. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  4. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  5. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  6. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  7. AFBorchert, de, en-3 (bureaucrat)
  8. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1
  9. Aka, de, en-3
  10. Alan, es, eu-3, en-2
  11. Alison, en, ga-3, fr-2, gd-1
  12. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  13. Alpertron, es, en-3
  14. Amada44, de, en-3, fr-1
  15. Angr, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  16. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  17. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  18. Anthere, fr, en-3
  19. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  20. Avenue, en, de-1, fr-1, it-1
  21. Avraham, en, he-2 (oversighter, steward)
  22. Axpde, de, en-4, es-1, fr-1, it-1, nl-1
  23. AzaToth, sv, en-4
  24. Badseed, el, en-3, it-1
  25. Barcex, es, en-2, fr-1
  26. Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, ga-1
  27. Basvb, nl, en-3, de-2
  28. Benoit Rochon fr, en-4
  29. Beria, pt, en-2, es-2
  30. Billinghurst, en
  31. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  32. Blurpeace, en, es-1
  33. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  34. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  35. Cambalachero, es, en-3
  36. Captain-tucker, en
  37. ChrisiPK, de, en-3, fr-1
  38. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2
  39. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  40. Cirt, en, es-2
  41. Common Good, en
  42. Cookie, es, en-2
  43. Courcelles, en, es-2, fr-2
  44. Coyau, fr, en-1
  45. DaB., de, en-1
  46. Dantadd, it, pt, en-3, es-3, fr-3, gl-3, ca-2, ro-1, el-1
  47. Darwinius, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  48. Davepape, en
  49. David Levy, en
  50. De728631, de, en-5
  51. Dereckson, fr, en-3, de-1, nl-1
  52. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  53. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  54. DMacks, en
  55. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  56. Dschwen, de, en-3, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  57. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  58. Ebrahim, fa
  59. Edgar181, en, de-1, fr-1, es-1
  60. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  61. Eleassar, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  62. Elitre, it, en-3, fr-2
  63. Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
  64. Elya, de, en-3, uk-2, ru-1
  65. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  66. EPO, da, en-3, de-1
  67. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1
  68. Esby, fr, en-3, de-1
  69. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  70. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  71. Fanghong, zh, en-2, fr-1
  72. Flominator, de, als, en-3
  73. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  74. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  75. Geni, en
  76. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  77. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  78. Gnangarra, en
  79. Golbez, en, ja-2
  80. Green Giant, en, de-1, fr-1
  81. grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  82. Gruznov, ru, en-1, fr-1
  83. Hedwig in Washington, de, en-4, nds-1
  84. Hekerui, de, en-4
  85. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  86. Hesperian, en
  87. HJ Mitchell, en
  88. Howcheng, en, ja-2
  89. Huntster, en
  90. Hystrix, de, en-1
  91. H-stt, de, en-4, fr-1
  92. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  93. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  94. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  95. January, en
  96. Jaqen, it, en-2
  97. Jarekt, pl, en
  98. JarrahTree, en, id-1
  99. Jastrow, fr, en-3, de-1, it-1
  100. Jcb, nl, en-3, es-3
  101. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  102. Jdforrester, en
  103. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  104. JGHowes, en, fr-2, de-1
  105. Jianhui67, en, zh-3, ms-1
  106. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  107. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  108. John Vandenberg, en
  109. Julo, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  110. JuTa, de, en-2, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  111. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-1, ko-1
  112. Kaldari, en
  113. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  114. Kanonkas, no, en-4, nn-3, da-2, sv-2, de-1 (bureaucrat)
  115. Killiondude, en, es-3, ru-1
  116. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2
  117. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  118. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  119. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  120. Krzysiu, pl, en-2, szl-2
  121. KTo288, en, zh-4
  122. Kwj2772, ko, en-2
  123. Leit, de, en-3, fr-1
  124. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  125. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  126. Logan, en, es-3
  127. Lokal Profil, sv, en-4, pt-2, fr-1
  128. LtPowers, en, es-1
  129. Lymantria, nl, de-2, en-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  130. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 (checkuser)
  131. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1
  132. Marcus Cyron, de, en-1
  133. Mardetanha fa, az, en-3, tr-2, ar-1 (steward)
  134. Martin H., de, en-2
  135. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  136. Matanya, en, he (steward)
  137. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  138. Mattbuck, en, fr-1, la-1
  139. Maxim, ru, en-3, fr-2
  140. MBisanz, en (steward)
  141. McZusatz, de, en-3, es-1, la-1 swg-1
  142. Mentifisto, en, mt, it-2 (steward)
  143. MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, sv-1, no-1
  144. MichaelMaggs, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  145. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  146. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  147. Miya, ja, en-2
  148. Mmxx, fa, en-3
  149. Mono, en
  150. Morgankevinj, en, es-1, la-1
  151. Mormegil, cs, en-2, de-1
  152. M0tty, fr, en-1
  153. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  154. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  155. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3
  156. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  157. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1
  158. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  159. Neozoon, de, en-4, nl-4, fr-2
  160. Nick, en, sco-2, fr-1
  161. Niklem, ru, en-3
  162. Nilfanion, en, fr-1
  163. NordNordWest, de, en-3
  164. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  165. Nyttend, en, ang-1
  166. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  167. Okki, fr, en-2
  168. Otourly, fr, en-2, it-1
  169. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  170. PierreSelim, fr, en-3, es-1 (oversighter)
  171. Pitke, fi, en-4, sv-2
  172. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  173. Pleclown, fr, en-3
  174. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  175. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  176. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  177. Powerek38, pl, en-4, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  178. PumpkinSky, en, de-2
  179. Putnik, ru, en-2
  180. Pyb, fr, en-2
  181. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  182. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  183. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  184. Rama, fr, en-3, de-2, la-2, es-1, it-1, ja-1 (oversighter)
  185. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  186. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  187. Rehman, en, si-1
  188. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  189. Revent, en
  190. Rillke, de, en-2, fr-1
  191. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  192. Rodhullandemu, en, fr-1, de-1, sv-1
  193. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  194. Ronhjones, en, fr-1
  195. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  196. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  197. RP88, en, de-1
  198. Rubin16, ru, tt, en-3
  199. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  200. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  201. Sandstein, als, de, en-4, fr-3, it-1
  202. SarahStierch, en
  203. Sealle, ru, en-4, pl-2, sk-2, uk-2
  204. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  205. Siebrand, nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1
  206. Sphilbrick, en
  207. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  208. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  209. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1
  210. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  211. Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
  212. Tabercil, en
  213. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  214. Tarawneh, en, ar, de-1
  215. Techman224, en
  216. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 (steward)
  217. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-2
  218. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  219. Tom, en, es-1
  220. Trijnstel, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 (checkuser, steward)
  221. tsca, pl, en, da
  222. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  223. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  224. Waldir, pt, en-3
  225. Wdwd, de, en-2
  226. Whym, ja, en-2
  227. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, as-2, bpy-1 (steward)
  228. WJBscribe, en, fr-3, de-1
  229. Wsiegmund, en, fr-1, es-1
  230. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  231. Wuzur, de, en-3
  232. wvk, de, en-4, fa-3, fr-2
  233. Yann, fr, en-3, hi-2, gu-1
  234. Yarl, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  235. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  236. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  237. Yuval Y, he, en-3
  238. Zhuyifei1999‎, zh, en-4
  239. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  240. とある白い猫, en, tr, az-3, ja-2, fr-1, nl-1
  241. CommonsDelinker, (bot)
  242. CommonsMaintenanceBot, (bot) see request
  243. GifTagger, (bot) see request
  244. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

The system currently recognizes 244 administrators. If that is not the last number in the list above, there is an error in the list.

Shortcut
COM:VOTE
This project page in other languages:

This is the requests and votes page, a centralized place where you can keep track of ongoing user requests, and where you can comment and leave your vote. Any user is welcome to comment on these requests, and any logged in user is welcome to vote.

When requesting rights that do not need the support of the community (e.g. filemover) please go to Commons:Requests for rights!

How and where to apply for additional user rights on CommonsEdit

How to comment and voteEdit

Any logged-in user is welcome to vote and to comment on the requests below. Votes from unregistered users are not counted, but comments may still be made. If the nomination is successful, a bureaucrat will grant the relevant rights. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Among other things, the closing bureaucrat may take into account the strength of any arguments presented and the experience and knowledge of the commenting users. For example, the comments and votes of users who have zero or few contributions on Commons may at the bureaucrat's discretion be discounted.

It is preferable if you give reasons both for Symbol support vote.svg Support votes or Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ones as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.

Purge the cache. Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.

Requests for Oversight rightsEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rightsEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for bureaucratshipEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for adminshipEdit

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Riley HuntleyEdit

Vote

Riley Huntley (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Scheduled to end: 18:39, (UTC)

I would like to present Riley Huntley as our next candidate for adminship. With more than 200k edits and 3500 in the Commons namespace, he is one of our most active editors. Besides assisting the community with bot/work requests and being on the OTRS team, Riley is active in [un]deletion requests process so granting him the tools will reduce the admin backlog. Currently we need more active admins who are willing to deal with those tasks since the admin backlogs are getting bigger and bigger.

Aside from the large amounts of maintenance work he performs, his main project Commons:WikiProject Pronunciation has led to the improvement of hundreds of thousands of existing files. He also is an experienced bot operator which is a huge pro since bots can make admin work more effective and help saving time.

In my opinion Riley is quite familiar with copyright law in general and he always does a proper job and when he states his opinion it is always clearly motivated. An extra bonus is that Riley is active during the European nights. We still need more admins covering that timezone. Natuur12 (talk) 18:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you the nomination, Natuur12, I accept your kind words and thank everyone for their time while considering me as a candidate for adminship. I was originally drawn to Commons back in 2012 to host my photography that I was interested in using cross wiki. After releasing I wasn't much of a photographer (although I have 10 QIs to my name), my contributions evolved into maintenance which I have enjoyed ever since. Expanding on Natuur12's nomination, I am highly involved in BRFA processes, automated tasks and other "technical" areas. I'm also actively involved at COM:DR, COM:UDR and often can be found requesting speedy deletion in accordance with COM:CSD. If elected to be admin, I would continue my involvement in these areas while also attempting to fight the ever growing admin backlog. Thank you everyone for your consideration. Riley Huntley (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

VotesEdit

CommentsEdit



Requests for license reviewer rightsEdit

No current requests.


Requests for permission to run a botEdit

Before making a bot request, please read the new version of the Commons:Bots page. Read Commons:Bots#Information on bots and make sure you have added the required details to the bot's page. A good example can be found here.

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bots/Archive.

Any user may comment on the merits of the request to run a bot. Please give reasons, as that makes it easier for the closing bureaucrat. Read Commons:Bots before commenting.

Josvebot (talk · contribs) 2Edit

Operator: Josve05a (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Tagging orphaned talkpages (talk pages without corresponding file/galley/cateory page) for deletion (CSD G8).

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuous

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 1 per 10 seconds

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): N

Programming language(s): AWB Using http://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/9152 Josve05a (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

  • Example contributions. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Please disable section headers in the edit summary; seems unnecessary. {{SD|G8}} does not allow you to explain that it is an automated request; {{Speedy|[[User:Josvebot|Bot]]: [[COM:CSD#G8|CSD G8]] (page dependent on deleted or non-existent content)}} would be more preferable imoh (or any other method that accomplishes the same). Could you also get some blue in the edit summary (i.e. CSD G8)? I don't like the edit summary in general, but the edits are more important. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:59, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Please only tag pages that have been last edited some time ago, I suggest at least 7 days, to not interrupt ongoing discussions. --Krd 07:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Hmm..I'd have to create soe very specific regex for this...hmm...let me get back to you allon that one. Josve05a (talk) 08:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
    Thank you for taking care! It's hard to notice talk pages when using batch deletion :-) I agree with Riley and Krd suggestion. Probably edit summary should contain beginning of page text, like default log entry for deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Without creating a separate module, it will be both difficult to code a thing to add the content of the talk in an edit summary, but also confusing for "new users". The current template (see below) is "dated", as to allow conversation to take place before deletion etc. All in all, I think we've reached a good compromise between the edit summary and tagging. @EugeneZelenko: What do you think? Josve05a (talk) 22:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
      If it's hard to place text for edit summary, current summary should be OK. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
      • It is noted above that this task will be performed using AWB, this is not possible within the software. The edit summary is also supposed to describe the change, not show the diff. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Just adding on some helpful advice while bored waiting for my tasks to be closed :P. The following in your query are redundant; (These are en.wikipedia specific templates that Commons do not have. I imagine it might also speed up the search.)
AND p1.page_id NOT IN (SELECT
                        page_id
                      FROM page
                      JOIN templatelinks
                      ON page_id = tl_from
                      WHERE tl_title="G8-exempt"
                      AND tl_namespace = 10)
AND p1.page_id NOT IN (SELECT
                        page_id
                      FROM page
                      JOIN templatelinks
                      ON page_id = tl_from
                      WHERE tl_title="Rtd"
                      AND tl_namespace = 10);
I'm sorry. My computer completely broke and became non-responsive, and have had to find an emergency solution now, while I wait for the IT-technicians to fix it. I haven't checked that query out yet, but I do like to create a new template, however I have a few other ideas. I could add such a template, but it should wait 7 days before it categorize it in a CSD-category, like a "slow-deletion" template (such as "No source"), in order to not tag a current discussion for deletion, and if there is a current discussion, somebody can remove it/add a parameter of some kind. Josve05a (talk) 06:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
{{Orphaned talk page since}} (Thanks to Riley)! Daily categories will (read "can") be created (if approved) by Riley's bot(s). Josve05a (talk) 20:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Test running on a few pages right now. Seems like it is doing the trick. Josve05a (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Test run looks good, I see no concerns and think this should be wrapped up. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Are file talk pages now tagged only after being 7 days untouched? If yes there is no need for having the "7 days ago eligible for deletion" note at Category:Orphaned talk pages because they are eligible for deletion immediately. --Krd 10:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
No, they are tagged when found with a "7 day deletion notice" to alllow for dicussion up to 7 days, or to remove the template. Josve05a (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
So the talk page has to stay in the category for 7 days and then the processing admin has to verify for every entry if the discussion really has stopped before the deleting. This appears as unreasonable effort to me. I'd prefer to wait longer (to be safe, orphaned and not touched for 14 days) and then delete right away without additional checks. --Krd 11:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Well, that is a difficult thing to do...I'm just brainstorming thoughts here, but not all new users add signature or timestamp, and AWB can't access the edit history when editing... Perhaps (this might be a bit complicated), but a way for the template to check the timestamp of when the page last edit (I know that AfC-review templates can see when something was last edited), and do a "if not edited in 7 days, add to a CSD category"...but as I said, this is complicated. I'd rather have all orphaned talk pages tagged, and let user remove the template or tag it with a "|no-delete=yes" if they want to continue to use that page, which they should not. Josve05a (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
While I think the original way was no more difficult that the effort required to delete no source files, I have modified the template. The template now displays "This page was last edited by ANGELUS (talk | contribs | logs) on " (previously only shown to admins, and didn't have the date) and in addition, will automatically add Category:Orphaned talk pages after 7 days of not being edited. Sufficient? :) Riley Huntley (talk) 18:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Good compromise for me. --Krd 06:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

If there are no objections, I think task should be approved. Looks like we are now all in agreement of how the template should operate. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

BMacZeroBot (talk · contribs) 5Edit

Operator: BMacZero (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Replace templates like {{PD-old-50}}, {{PD-old-50-1923}}, and {{PD-old-50-1996}} with {{PD-old-auto}}, {{PD-old-auto-1923}}, and {{PD-old-auto-1996}} respectively (including 'deathyear' parameter) where the page with the license also has a Creator template acting as an author with a readable death year.

This will usually be run at the same time as the task from Commons:Bots/Requests/BMacZeroBot 4. BMacZero (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One big run for now

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): 6

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): N (already has)

Programming language(s): C#

BMacZero (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

I did a test run of 30 - see bot contribs. BMacZero (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Looks good to me. --Krd 05:40, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
I think will be good idea to use link to templates in edit summaries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
I refined the edit summaries (after a few small snafus), and ran more tests. I also fixed a problem with handling licenses inside {{PD-Art}}. BMacZero (talk) 06:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Looks OK for me, but it's seems logical to use Wikidata as source of death date (if creator template is available). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Added and tested a few. BMacZero (talk) 04:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
But could be date of death queried without copying it to file description? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Oh I see what you mean. I hadn't considered that. I suppose it could be done with Arbitrary Access (eventually), though I don't think it can be done completely automatically - a bot would probably still have to go through and add the Creator's Wikidata ID as a parameter. Unless Scribunto can pull info from the Creator template on the page that transcludes the module? Maybe someone knows more. BMacZero (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
@BMacZero: Please advise what this is going to mean. Is this request obsolete per above comment? --Krd 09:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
@Krd: I started a discussion at Commons:Village_pump#Proper_implementation_of_PD-old-auto_with_Arbitrary_Access. BMacZero (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Both User:Jarekt and I (so far) feel that the current implementation of PD-old-auto is still the best one. That would mean that we should go ahead with this request (can give the VP thread more time if you like, though). BMacZero (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The deathyear seems the simpler and most clear. It is also a system we have been using for a while. I am OK with creating new mechanisms of passing information around by "quering without copying it to file description" but at the moment I can not think of a way to do it (we could copy Wikidata Q-codes instead and add an expensive function to look up the deathyear). So I would stick to the old ways of doing businesses. --Jarekt (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
By the way Some comments about edits:
  • I would not do {{PD-old-100}} -> {{PD-old-auto}} conversions. {{PD-old-auto}} will do a lot of non-trivial calculations before calling {{PD-old-100}}. I think we should verify and even add unused deathyear for clarity. But {{PD-old-100}} is so much simpler.
  • Edits like this are not the best option. If there is PD-Art or PD-Scan than PD-old-uto should be combined with it. Multiple PD-old templates should be merged.
  • Could you test on tricky cases with multiple Creator templates. PD-1923 (or {{PD-1996}}) and PD-old templates, which should be combined, etc.
--Jarekt (talk) 02:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
All sounds good - will do it when I get a chance. BMacZero (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
We may need to put this request on hold. I'm not sure when the next chance I'll get to work on it will be. BMacZero (talk) 17:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Requests for commentEdit