Commons:Administratoren

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Administrators and the translation is 100% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Administrators and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:A · COM:ADMIN · COM:SYSOP

Other languages:
als • ‎مصرى • ‎asturianu • ‎български • ‎বাংলা • ‎brezhoneg • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎Deutsch • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎English • ‎Canadian English • ‎español • ‎فارسی • ‎suomi • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎עברית • ‎हिन्दी • ‎magyar • ‎Հայերեն • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎italiano • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어 • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎नेपाली • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎پښتو • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎sicilianu • ‎svenska • ‎Türkçe • ‎українська • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎中文
Commons Administrator.svg

Diese Seite erklärt die Rolle von Administratoren (manchmal auch Admins bzw. Sysops) auf Wikimedia Commons. Bitte beachte, dass die Rolle der Administratoren und die Voraussetzungen, Administrator zu werden, von denen anderer Projekte abweichen können.

Wenn du die Hilfe eines Administrators brauchst, wende dich bitte an das Administrators' noticeboard.

Es gibt derzeit 235 Administratoren auf Commons.

Ein Admin mit Wischmop, ein typisches Symbol von Administratoren. Siehe auch: Der gute Admin.

Was ist ein Administrator?

Administrators as of März 2017 [+/−]
Listing by language
Listing by date
Listing by activity

Number of Admins: 235

  1. -revi, ko, en-3 (global renamer)
  2. ~riley, en, fr-1, es-1
  3. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  4. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  5. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  6. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  7. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  8. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  9. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 (global renamer)
  10. Aka, de, en-3
  11. Alan, es, eu-3, en-2
  12. Alison, en, ga-3, fr-2, gd-1
  13. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  14. Amada44, de, en-3, fr-1
  15. Angr, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  16. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  17. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  18. Anthere, fr, en-3
  19. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  20. Avraham, en, he-2 (steward)
  21. AzaToth, sv, en-4
  22. Badseed, el, en-3, it-1
  23. Barcex, es, en-2, fr-1
  24. Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, ga-1
  25. Basvb, nl, en-3, de-2
  26. Benoit Rochon fr, en-4
  27. Beria, pt, en-2, es-2
  28. Billinghurst, en
  29. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  30. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  31. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  32. Cambalachero, es, en-3
  33. Captain-tucker, en
  34. ChrisiPK, de, en-3, fr-1
  35. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2
  36. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  37. Common Good, en
  38. Cookie, es, en-2
  39. Courcelles, en, es-2, fr-2
  40. Czar, en
  41. DaB., de, en-1
  42. Dantadd, it, pt, en-3, es-3, fr-3, gl-3, ca-2, ro-1, el-1
  43. Daphne Lantier, en
  44. Darwinius, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  45. Davepape, en
  46. David Levy, en
  47. De728631, de, en-5
  48. Dereckson, fr, en-3, de-1, nl-1
  49. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  50. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  51. DMacks, en
  52. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  53. Dschwen, de, en-3, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  54. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  55. Ebrahim, fa
  56. Edgar181, en, de-1, fr-1, es-1
  57. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  58. Eleassar, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  59. Elitre, it, en-3, fr-2
  60. Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
  61. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  62. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 (global renamer)
  63. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  64. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  65. Fanghong, zh, en-2, fr-1
  66. Flominator, de, als, en-3
  67. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  68. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  69. Geni, en
  70. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  71. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  72. Gnangarra, en
  73. Golbez, en, ja-2
  74. Green Giant, en, de-1, fr-1
  75. grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  76. Gruznov, ru, en-1, fr-1
  77. Hedwig in Washington, de, en-4, nds-1
  78. Hekerui, de, en-4
  79. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  80. Hesperian, en
  81. HJ Mitchell, en
  82. Howcheng, en, ja-2
  83. Huntster, en
  84. Hystrix, de, en-1
  85. H-stt, de, en-4, fr-1
  86. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  87. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  88. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  89. January, en
  90. Jaqen, it, en-2
  91. Jarekt, pl, en
  92. JarrahTree, en, id-1
  93. Jastrow, fr, en-3, ro-2, de-1, it-1
  94. Jcb, nl, en-3, es-3
  95. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  96. Jdforrester, en
  97. Jdx, pl
  98. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  99. JGHowes, en, fr-2, de-1
  100. Jianhui67, en, zh-3, ms-1 (global renamer)
  101. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  102. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  103. John Vandenberg, en
  104. Josve05a, sv, en-3
  105. Julo, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  106. JuTa, de, en-2, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  107. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-1, ko-1
  108. Kaldari, en
  109. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  110. Kelly, en
  111. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
  112. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  113. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  114. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  115. KTo288, en, zh-4
  116. Kwj2772, ko, en-2
  117. Leit, de, en-3, fr-1
  118. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  119. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  120. Lokal Profil, sv, en-4, pt-2, fr-1
  121. Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  122. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 (checkuser)
  123. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 (global renamer)
  124. Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
  125. Mardetanha fa, az, en-3, tr-2, ar-1 (steward)
  126. Martin H., de, en-2
  127. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  128. Matanya, en, he (steward)
  129. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  130. Mattbuck, en, fr-1, la-1
  131. Maxim, ru, en-3, fr-2
  132. MBisanz, en (steward)
  133. McZusatz, de, en-3, es-1, la-1 swg-1
  134. Mentifisto, en, mt, it-2 (steward)
  135. MichaelMaggs, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  136. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  137. Missvain, en
  138. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  139. Miya, ja, en-2
  140. Mmxx, fa, en-3
  141. Mono, en
  142. Morgankevinj, en, es-1, la-1
  143. Mormegil, cs, en-2, de-1
  144. M0tty, fr, en-1
  145. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  146. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  147. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 (global renamer)
  148. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  149. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1
  150. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  151. Neozoon, de, en-4, nl-4, fr-2
  152. Nick, en, sco-2, fr-1
  153. Nilfanion, en, fr-1
  154. NordNordWest, de, en-3
  155. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  156. Nyttend, en, ang-1
  157. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  158. Okki, fr, en-2
  159. Otourly, fr, en-2, it-1
  160. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  161. Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
  162. PierreSelim, fr, en-3, es-1 (oversighter)
  163. Pitke, fi, en-4, sv-2
  164. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  165. Pleclown, fr, en-3
  166. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  167. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  168. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  169. PumpkinSky, en, de-2
  170. Putnik, ru, en-2
  171. Pyb, fr, en-2
  172. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  173. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  174. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  175. Rama, fr, en-3, de-2, la-2, es-1, it-1, ja-1 (oversighter)
  176. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  177. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  178. Rehman, en, si-1
  179. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  180. Revent, en (oversighter)
  181. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  182. Rodhullandemu, en, fr-1, de-1, sv-1
  183. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  184. Ronhjones, en, fr-1
  185. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  186. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  187. RP88, en, de-1
  188. Rubin16, ru, tt, en-3 (global renamer)
  189. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  190. Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
  191. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  192. Sandstein, als, de, en-4, fr-3, it-1
  193. Sealle, ru, en-4, pl-2, sk-2, uk-2
  194. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  195. Siebrand, nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1
  196. Sphilbrick, en
  197. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  198. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  199. Srittau, de, en-3
  200. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 (global renamer)
  201. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  202. Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
  203. Tabercil, en
  204. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  205. Tarawneh, en, ar, de-1
  206. Techman224, en
  207. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 (steward)
  208. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-2
  209. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  210. Trijnstel, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 (checkuser, steward)
  211. tsca, pl, en, da
  212. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  213. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  214. Waldir, pt, en-3
  215. Wdwd, de, en-2
  216. Whym, ja, en-2
  217. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, as-2, bpy-1 (steward)
  218. WJBscribe, en, fr-3, de-1 (global renamer)
  219. Wsiegmund, en, fr-1, es-1
  220. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  221. Wuzur, de, en-3
  222. wvk, de, en-4, fa-3, fr-2
  223. Yann, fr, en-3, hi-2, gu-1
  224. Yarl, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  225. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  226. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  227. Yuval Y, he, en-3
  228. Zhuyifei1999‎, zh, en-4
  229. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  230. とある白い猫, en, tr, az-3, ja-2, fr-1, nl-1
  231. CommonsDelinker, (bot)
  232. CommonsMaintenanceBot, (bot) see request
  233. Embedded Data Bot, (bot) see request
  234. GifTagger, (bot) see request
  235. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

The system currently recognizes 235 administrators. If that is not the last number in the list above, there is an error in the list.

Technisch

Administratoren sind Benutzer mit folgenden Rechten:

  • Bilder oder andere hochgeladene Dateien löschen und wiederherstellen bzw. gelöschte Versionen einsehen und wiederherstellen
  • Seiten löschen und wiederherstellen bzw. gelöschte Versionen einsehen und wiederherstellen
  • Seiten schützen und auch den Schutz wieder aufheben sowie geschützte Seiten bearbeiten
  • Benutzer und IP-Adressen/IP-Adressbereiche sperren und entsperren
  • Seiten im MediaWiki-Namensraum bearbeiten
  • Dateien umbenennen
  • Benutzer verschiedenen Gruppen hinzufügen und wieder daraus entfernen
  • Upload Wizard-Kampagnen konfigurieren
  • Einzelne Logbuch-Einträge sowie einzelne Versionen von Seiten löschen und wiederherstellen
  • Seiten aus anderen Wikis importieren
  • Versionsgeschichten von Seiten vereinen
  • Missbrauchsfilter-Einstellungen bearbeiten
  • Beim Verschieben die Erstellung einer Weiterleitung unterdrücken
  • Die Benutzernamens-Ähnlichkeitsprüfung und die schwarze Liste unerwünschter Seiten- oder Benutzernamen außer Kraft setzen
  • Gleichzeitig Nachrichten an mehrere Benutzer senden (massmessage)
  • Höhere Limits in API-Abfragen

Diese Rechte sind allgemein als Administrationswerkzeuge bekannt.

Rolle in der Gemeinschaft

Administratoren sind erfahrene und vertrauenswürdige Mitglieder der Commons-Benutzerschaft, die zusätzliche Verwaltungsaufgaben übernommen haben und nach Konsens/Abstimmung mit den Administrationswerkzeugen ausgestattet wurden. Administratoren haben unterschiedliche Interessen- und Fachgebiete; typische Aufgaben eines Administrators sind die Bearbeitung und Erledigung von Löschanträgen, das Löschen von Urheberrechtsverletzungen, das Wiederherstellen von Dateien, das Schützen von Commons vor Vandalismus und die Bearbeitung von Vorlagen und anderen geschützten Seiten. Selbstverständlich können einige dieser Aufgaben auch von Benutzern ohne erweiterte Rechte erledigt werden.

Von Administratoren wird erwartet, dass sie die Ziele des Projekts verstehen und bereit sind, konstruktiv mit anderen auf diese Ziele hinzuarbeiten. Administratoren sollten außerdem Commons' Richtlinien verstehen und befolgen und gegebenenfalls den Konsens der Community befolgen.

Außerhalb von Rollen, die die Benutzung von Administrationswerkzeugen bedingen, haben Administratoren keine besondere redaktionelle Autorität durch ihre Position. In Diskussionen und Abstimmungen werden ihre Beiträge genauso behandelt wie die jedes anderen Benutzers. Natürlich sind einige Administratoren einflussreich, aber das liegt nicht an ihrer Position als solcher, sondern an dem Vertrauen, das sie sich in der Community erworben haben.

Vorschläge für Administratoren

Entzug von Adminrechten

Gemäß der Entzugs-Richtlinie können Adminrechte bei Inaktivität oder Missbrauch wieder entzogen werden.

Bewerbung als Administrator

Alle Benutzer, die Administratorenrechte erlangen möchten, müssen durch diesen Prozess gehen und eine Anfrage zu Administratorenrechten stellen, das schließt auch alle ehemaligen Administratoren ein, die ihre früheren Rechte wiedererlangen möchten.

Gehe als erstes auf Commons:Administrators/Howto und lies dir die Seite gründlich durch. Danach kannst du zurückkommen und im folgenden Abschnitt deine Kandidatur starten.

  • Nachdem du auf den passenden Button geklickt und die Unterseite angelegt hast, kopiere den Link zur Unterseite, beispielsweise "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Benutzername", bearbeite Commons:Administrators/Requests und füge ihn oben im entsprechenden Abschnitt ein. Danach umschließe ihn mit doppelten geschweiften Klammern (beispielsweise {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}), um die Unterseite einzubinden.
  • Wenn du von jemandem nominiert wurdest, akzeptiere bitte die Nominierung durch einen kurzen Kommentar und deine Signatur. Die Unterseite muss dann durch dich oder den Nominierenden entsprechend eingebunden werden.
Ersetze in der folgenden Box Username durch deinen Benutzernamen:



Abstimmung

Jeder registrierte Benutzer kann sich an der Abstimmung beteiligen. Wenn ein Benutzer bisher erst wenige oder gar keine Beiträge gemacht hat, könnte seine Stimme jedoch nicht vollständig gewichtet werden. Es ist gern gesehen, wenn die Gründe für   Support- oder   Oppose-Stimmen angegeben werden, da dies dem Bürokraten, der über den Antrag entscheidet, bei seiner Entscheidung hilft. Eine gute Begründung, bei Bedarf mit entsprechenden Nachweisen, kann stärker gewichtet werden als eine bloße Pro- oder Kontra-Stimme.

Damit der Antrag erfolgreich ist, werden normalerweise mehr als 75% Zustimmung und mindestens 8 positive Stimmen erwartet. Allerdings hat der bearbeitende Bürokrat einen Spielraum bei der Einschätzung des Community-Konsens und die Entscheidung muss nicht ausschließlich auf bloßen Zahlen beruhen.

  Neutrale Kommentare werden zur Ermittlung der prozentualen Pro-/Kontra-Ergebnisse nicht mitgezählt. Jedoch sind solche Kommentare Teil der Diskussion, können andere Diskussionsteilnehmer umstimmen und dem Bürokraten beim Verständnis des Community-Konsens behilflich sein.

Cache leeren Benutze den untenstehenden Bearbeiten-Link, um die eingebundene Seite zu bearbeiten.

Requests for adminship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Mates

Vote

Mates (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Scheduled to end: 12:26, (UTC)

Hello. I would like to request for administrator rights on WIkimedia Commons project. I am an OTRS volunteer and most of my contributions are just about adding permission, requesting for undeletion of premitted files and other maintenance work. It would really make my job easier if I could view deleted edits (i.e. when searching if the client has already uploaded something else), undelete files that get the permission and delete those that are copyright violation. Please do not expect me to be one of the most active administrators but I will do my best to help. Although there were some troubles with me and my uploads in my beginnings I think those were just about misunderstanding some rules of this project and don't affect my editing today (in my current point of view and work I would consider myself as user-idiot then :-)). I have 3 years experience with administrating Czech Wikipedia project where I have these rights since late 2013 on. Thank you for considering my request and now it is your turn to decide. Mates (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Votes

  •   Support I'm happy for trustworthy OTRS users who are handling a sensible volume of permissions e-mails to be granted administrator access here. I suspect I may be in a minority though. Good luck either way, Mates. Nick (talk) 12:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose 1,279 edits here on commons (mostly adding PermissionOTRS template) isn't enough. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. While as an OTRS agent I do feel that Mates is certainly trustworthy, and although I'd really love to {{s}} this nomination per Nick, I don't feel I can support any candidate that hasn't started a single non-OTRS-related DR here on Commons. I hope this isn't discouraging you from continuing your much appreciated work as well as gaining more experience on Commons and applying again at a later point in time (I'd suggest asking an admin or bureaucrat to nominate you then). Also per Steinsplitter.    FDMS  4    13:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per above - As they're an OTRS volunteer they're obviously a trustworthy/trusted editor however they have no interest in dealing with any of the backlogs here (DR being the most common one), As noted above they'd only be doing OTRS work and not much else so I can't support a candidate who has no interest in actually helping around here, The edit count is a concern but not as much as the backlogs, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:20, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support per Nick. The candidate is clearly a trustworthy and competent contributor, and has a very good reason for requesting adminship. I don't believe I'll ever understand the thinking behind opposing anyone who hasn't promised to single-handedly clear the DR backlog. It's infinitely better to have many admins doing a little bit of work each than to sit on our hands while we wait for one person with 28 hours in a day to come and save us. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I'd also point out that we've suffered from exceptionally active administrators burning out trying to do too much on their own, so I fully endorse the 'many hands make light work' approach. Nick (talk) 16:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support A trustworthy contributor. I don't see the problem if (as stated) he concentrates only on OTRS related work, namely adding permissions and undeleting files that obtained a valid authorisation. He may eventually move to other tasks when he'll feel more confident with the project. --Ruthven (msg) 12:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Steinsplitter. Alan (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Krd 12:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC) Although the oppose arguments are reasonable, I'd be happy to apply some leap of faith here, not least because I can easily expect his activity better than average.
  •   Support per Nick Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I share the concerns brought up by the opposers but I don't want to oppose an otherwise competent candidate. Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Correct answer to my question. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Agree with Juliancolton. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Ankry (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support as per Nick and Juliancolton. Mates's experience as an admin at the Czech Wikipedia gives me extra confidence that he will do a good job here. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support sure — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support yes, ofcourse. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per Natuur12. Obviously trusted and competent, but I would like to see more admin backlog-related activity. -- Poké95 03:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   A favor, per Ruthven. Érico (talk) 03:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - sometimes it's not quantity of edits, but quality. People who don't use the automated systems have a lower edit count than people who do. And OTRS is a one-by-one situation; I wouldn't expect large number and/or fast edits from a careful OTRS worker. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I'm tending to agree with Ellin Beltz. --A.Savin 12:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Rzuwig 20:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Changed my mind; I no longer think that not high backlog activity is a reason to oppose here. I will be creating an essay on why we should not oppose candidates similar to Mates here and why we should prefer to recruit more admins who aren't as active as those in the most active admins list rather than recruiting few admins who are very active. I think Mates will be a good admin here. Still, I would like to see more activity when this user becomes an admin. -- Poké95 01:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support. -- Geagea (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted contributor, who has a legitimate use for the tools. - Reventtalk 09:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support per Nick and others. Although a higher Commons edit count would be good (suggesting amongst experience other things), it is not the only factor that should be considered for potential admins. The experience as an admin on another project and the OTRS work contribute significantly to me supporting this request. Green Giant (talk) 13:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   SupportMarcoAurelio 16:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Please add babels to your userpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    Yes, I am sorry, I updated the userpage (thought I have just meta userpage there, sorry) --Mates (talk) 13:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

  Question Many years ago a user uploaded photos into Estonian Wikipedia with license "My photos can be used any way, without any condition, but only for good purposes." Is it acceptable license in Commons? Taivo (talk) 20:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello. No. Wikimedia Commons content must be licensed under a free license that allows using by anyone and for any purpose they want (even if released as public domain). However there might be some other legal restrictions that might affect usage as personality rights or trademarks. Although I don't think those were meant by that user as "bad purposes" they are not supposed to be included in licensing. There are COM:L and COM:NCR explaining that completely. Regards --Mates (talk) 20:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think will be good idea to extend nomination for a week. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Though I don't oppose EugeneZelenko idea, honestly, the support votes have been made only by experimented users (almost administrators), in my opinion this can be closed successful (if my count is correct) without additional duration. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
No need to extend; there is 83% support for the candidate, which is over the 75% support requirement. Poké95 00:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
More to the point, no oppose or even neutral votes have been issued in fully six days, so there's clearly no ongoing shift in consensus that needs to run its course. I voted in the affirmative and haven't been a bureaucrat here for many years, so my opinion is irrelevant on several different levels, but I agree that extending for another week is not necessary. I suppose the candidate's low edit count may make this a somewhat special case, so the 'crats want to be doubly careful before flipping the switch. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I could understand this being a special case if Mates wasn't already an admin for several years on another project. As is, I agree that there's no need to drag this out another week. Daphne Lantier 03:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The 75% is not a hard requirement... it's reasonable to assume that this has been discussed by the crats on their list. Waiting longer, to allow the establishment of a clear consensus, is reasonable and harmless. - Reventtalk 09:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Frankly, given the relatively low levels of participation seen by most adminship requests here, I wouldn't be opposed to making two weeks the standard duration. But I guess that's for a different discussion. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: if a decission to extend this vote has already been taken, shouldn't the timer be adjusted? Ankry (talk) 11:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Themightyquill

Vote

Themightyquill (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Scheduled to end: 09:25, (UTC)

I hereby nominate Themightyquill for adminship here on Commons. Themightyquill is experienced and active user with more than 180000 edits here on Wikimedia Commons. He started editing in May 2006. He is familiar with deletion requests and experienced in CFD (where we have a huge backlog). I am sure he will help us reducing the admin backlogs. He is mellow and constructive even in disagreement; I believe we look for such attitude in administrators. I think Themightyquill would make a good and active Commons admin, and I hope the community agrees. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Candidate's acceptance: I accept. Thanks for the nomination. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Votes

  •   Support Overdue. - Reventtalk 09:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I believe this user would be able to reduce the CfD backlog, a backlog most admins are not interested in. -- Poké95 09:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Highly experienced, trusted and active user. I like his attitude in discussions as well. --Mates (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support as nom. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Yann (talk) 09:50, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support experienced user. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Per nom. ~ Moheen (keep talking) 13:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support per nom. The significant experience on another project is an added bonus. Green Giant (talk) 14:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   SupportMarcoAurelio 16:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Great nominee with plenty of experience and activity. Daphne Lantier 17:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Requests for bureaucratship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for Oversight rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Archiv

Du findest bisherige Adminkandidaturen unter Commons:Administrators/Archive.

Siehe auch