Commons:Administradores

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Administrators and the translation is 97% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Administrators and have to be approved by a translation administrator.
Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcuts: COM:A· COM:ADMIN· COM:SYSOP

Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎Canadian English • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎Nederlands • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎Zazaki • ‎als • ‎asturianu • ‎brezhoneg • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎interlingua • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎norsk bokmål • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎shqip • ‎sicilianu • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ • ‎български • ‎молдовеняскэ • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎հայերեն • ‎עברית • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎مصرى • ‎پښتو • ‎नेपाली • ‎मराठी • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎ગુજરાતી • ‎ไทย • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어
Commons Administrator.svg

Esta páxina explica a función dos administradores (ás veces chamados admins' ou sysops) en Wikimedia Commons. Nota que detalles da función, e o xeito en que os admins son nomeados, pode diferir desde outros sitios.

Se queres pedir axuda dun admin, por favor envía un correo en tableiro de Administradores.

Hai actualmente 216 admins en Commons.

Que é un administrador?

Administrators as of maio 2020 [+/−]
Listing by language
Listing by date
Listing by activity

Number of Admins: 216

  1. -revi, ko, en-3 (steward)
  2. ~riley, en, fr-1, es-1
  3. 1989, en
  4. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  5. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  6. 4nn1l2, fa, en-3, ar-1
  7. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  8. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  9. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  10. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  11. Ahmad252, fa, en-3, ar-1
  12. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1
  13. Aka, de, en-3
  14. Alan, es, eu-3, en-2
  15. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  16. Amada44, de, en-3, fr-1
  17. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  18. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  19. Anthere, fr, en-3
  20. Arthur Crbz, fr, en-4, es-3
  21. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  22. AzaToth, sv, en-4
  23. Benoît Prieur,fr, en-3, pt-2, es-1, it-1, hy-1
  24. Benoit Rochon, fr, en-4
  25. Billinghurst, en
  26. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  27. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  28. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  29. Captain-tucker, en
  30. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2
  31. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  32. clpo13, en
  33. Common Good, en
  34. Cookie, es, en-2
  35. Czar, en
  36. DaB., de, en-1
  37. Dantadd, it, pt, en-3, es-3, fr-3, gl-3, ca-2, ro-1, el-1
  38. DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  39. Davepape, en
  40. David Levy, en
  41. De728631, de, en-5
  42. Dereckson, fr, en-3, de-1, nl-1
  43. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  44. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  45. DMacks, en
  46. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  47. Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1
  48. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  49. Ebrahim, fa, en-3
  50. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  51. Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
  52. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  53. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1
  54. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  55. Explicit, en, es, ko-2
  56. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  57. Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2
  58. Flominator, de, als, en-3
  59. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  60. Gbawden, en-3, af-1
  61. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  62. Geni, en
  63. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  64. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  65. Gnangarra, en, nys-1
  66. Golbez, en, ja-2
  67. Green Giant, en, de-1, fr-1 (steward)
  68. GreenMeansGo, en
  69. grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  70. Guanaco, en, es-1
  71. Hanooz, fa, en-2
  72. Hedwig in Washington, de, en-4, nds-1
  73. Hekerui, de, en-4
  74. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  75. Hesperian, en
  76. Howcheng, en, ja-2
  77. Huntster, en
  78. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  79. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  80. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  81. Jaqen, it, en-2
  82. Jarekt, pl, en
  83. JarrahTree, en, id-1
  84. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  85. Jdforrester, en
  86. Jdx, pl
  87. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  88. JGHowes, en, fr-2, de-1
  89. Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-1
  90. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  91. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  92. JoKalliauer, de, en-3
  93. Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2
  94. Josve05a, sv, en-3
  95. Juliancolton, en
  96. Julo, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  97. JuTa, de, en-2, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  98. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1
  99. Kaldari, en
  100. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  101. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
  102. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  103. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser, steward)
  104. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  105. Kwj2772, ko, en-3
  106. Leit, de, en-3, fr-1
  107. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  108. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  109. Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2
  110. Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  111. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 (checkuser)
  112. Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  113. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1
  114. Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
  115. Mardetanha fa, az, en-3, tr-2, ar-1 (steward)
  116. Martin H., de, en-2
  117. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  118. Matanya, en, he (steward)
  119. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  120. Mates, cs, en-3, sk-4, de-1
  121. Mattbuck, en, fr-1, la-1
  122. Maxim, ru, en-3, fr-2
  123. MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1
  124. MBisanz, en
  125. Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1
  126. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  127. Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1
  128. Missvain, en
  129. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  130. Miya, ja, en-2
  131. Mmullie (WMF) (administrator (until 05:31, 1 July 2020))
  132. Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
  133. Morgankevinj, en
  134. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  135. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  136. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3
  137. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  138. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1 (steward)
  139. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  140. Neozoon, de, en-4, nl-4, fr-2
  141. Nick, en, sco-2, fr-1
  142. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  143. Nyttend, en, ang-1
  144. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  145. Otourly, fr, en-2, it-1
  146. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  147. Perhelion, de, en-3
  148. Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
  149. PierreSelim, fr, en-3, es-1 (oversighter)
  150. Pitke, fi, en-4, sv-2
  151. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  152. Pleclown, fr, en-3
  153. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  154. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  155. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  156. Putnik, ru, en-2
  157. Pyb, fr, en-2
  158. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  159. Racconish, fr, en-4
  160. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  161. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  162. Rama, fr, en-3, de-2, la-2, es-1, it-1, ja-1 (oversighter)
  163. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  164. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  165. Regasterios, hu, en-1
  166. Rehman, en, si-1
  167. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  168. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  169. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  170. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  171. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  172. RP88, en, de-1
  173. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  174. Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
  175. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  176. Sealle, ru, en-4, pl-2, sk-2, uk-2
  177. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  178. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  179. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  180. Srittau, de, en-3
  181. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1
  182. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  183. Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
  184. Strakhov, es, en-2
  185. Tabercil, en
  186. TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  187. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  188. Tarawneh, en, ar, de-1
  189. Techman224, en
  190. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2
  191. Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
  192. The Squirrel Conspiracy, en
  193. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-2
  194. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  195. Tomer T, he, en-3
  196. Trijnstel, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 (checkuser, steward)
  197. Tulsi Bhagat, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, bh-2, hif-2
  198. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  199. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  200. Wdwd, de, en-2
  201. Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
  202. Whym, ja, en-2
  203. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1
  204. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  205. Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
  206. Yarl, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  207. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  208. Y.haruo, ja, en-1
  209. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  210. Yuval CT, he, en-3
  211. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  212. علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward)
  213. Abuse filter, (automated account)
  214. CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request
  215. CommonsMaintenanceBot, (bot) see request
  216. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

The system currently recognizes 216 administrators. If that is not the last number in the list above, there is an error in the list.

Técnico

Os administradores son usuarios coa habilidades técnica en Wikimedia Commons de:

  • Elimina e recupera imaxes e outros arquivos subidos, e para ver e restaurar versións eliminadas
  • Elimina e recupera páxinas, e para ver e restaurar revisións eliminadas
  • Protexe e desprotexe páxinas, e para editar páxinas-admin protexidas
  • Bloquea e desbloquea usuarios, enderezos de #IP individual e rangos de enderezo de IP
  • Editar o MediaWiki namespace
  • Rebautiza ficheiros
  • engade e tirar usergroups
  • Configura campañas Upload Wizard
  • Elimina e recupera entradas específicas rexistradas e revisións de páxinas
  • Páxinas de importación desde outro wiki
  • Fusionar a historia de páxinas
  • Modifica filtros de abuso
  • Non crear redireccións desde páxinas orixinais cando as páxinas son movidas
  • ser inmune a verificacións así como ás listas negras de nomes de usuario
  • Enviar unha mensaxe a usuarios múltiples inmediatamente (massmessage)
  • Uso de límites máis altos en consultas de API

Estes son colectivamente conocidos como "botóns" ou ferramentas admin.

Páxinas da comunidade

Os administradores son experimentados e membros confiados na comunidade de Commons que tomou o traballo de mantemento adicional e foi encomendado cas ferramentas admin por voto de consenso/público. Diferentes admins teñen áreas diferentes de interese e pericia, o mais típico admin ten as tarefas que inclúen decisións de pechando peticións de borrado, eliminando por violacións de copyright, recuperación de ficheiros onde sexa necesario, proteccións Commons contra vandalismo, e traballando en modelos e outras páxinas protexidas. Naturalmente, algunhas destas tarefas poden ser feitas por non-admins tamén.

Os administradores son esperados para entender alcance deste proxecto, e ser preparado para traballar construtivamente con outros cara aqueles fins. Os administradores tamén terían que entender e seguir as directrices Commons, e onde sexa apropiado, respecto ao consenso comunitario.

Á parte desde funcións que requiren uso das ferramentas admin, os administradores non teñen autoridade de edición especial por virtude da súa posición, e en discusións e votos públicos as súas contribucións son tratadas no mesmo xeito como calquera editor normal. Algún admins poden devir máis influínnte, non debido á súa posición como tal excepto desde a confianza persoal que poideron gañar na comunidade.

Suxestións para administradores

Fai o favor e le Commons:Guide to adminship.

Dereitos de admin ao garete

Baixo a de-admin policy, os dereitos de administrador poden ser revogados debido a inactividade ou abuso de ferramentas admin.

Para chegar a admin

Todo presunto admin ten que pasar por este proceso e someterse a RFA, incluíndo todo ex-admin que está á busca para regresar á súa función anterior.

Primeiro, vai a Commons:Administrators/Howto e lé a información alí. Entón volve aquí a facer a túa pregunta na sección de embaixo.

  • Despois de premer no botón apropiado e creando o subpáxina, copia a ligazón á subpáxina, e.x. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edita Commons:Administrators/Requests e colalo na parte superior da sección, entón póñao entre chaves dobres (e.x. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) na transclude.
  • Se alguén nominoute, fai o favor de aceptar o nomeamento e expor "acepto" ou algo similar, e asinando abaixo do nomeamento ti. Ou a persoa que te nomina deberá transcluir a páxina.
Uso a caixa abaixo, substituíndo Username co voso usuario/a:


Votación

Calquera usuario rexistrado pode votar aquí a pesar de que en certos casos os usuarios con poucas achegas non poideran votar ou terse en conta o seu voto. É preferible dar o voto razoado para   Support de apoio ou   Oppose para axudar ao burócrata ao peche na súa decisión. O peso máis grande é dado a os argumentos, especialmente se hai evidencia que o apoie, que un voto sinxelo.

A promoción normalmente require polo menos 75% a favor, cun mínimo de 8 votos de apoio. Votos desde os usuarios non rexistrados non son contados. Con todo, o peche do burócrata ten discreción en xulgar consenso comunitario, e a decisión non necesariamente estea baseada nos números crus.

Os comentarios   Neutral non son contados nos totais de voto para os propósitos de calcular o pase/falla das porcentaxes. Con todo tales comentarios son parte da discusión, pode persuadir a outros, e contribuír ao peche do burócrata a entender de consenso comunitario.

Purge the cache O uso de editar ligazón seguinte para editar ou transcluir a páxina.

Requests for adminship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Nat

Vote

Nat (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 22:31, (UTC)

I have seen Nat around quite a bit on COM:DR and COM:UNDEL and have found him to be one of our most knowledgeable volunteers in that area. He has served as an admin on English Wikipedia since 2007 and has ramped up his activity on Commons in the last six months, quickly becoming a great asset to the project. Nat is a prolific OTRS volunteer and has deep knowledge of copyright issues and other policies. It is my honor to nominate him for adminship. King of ♥ 22:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Votes

  •   Support as nominator. King of ♥ 22:31, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I should've been co-nom if Nat told me who those two users who asked him too for considering adminship... --pandakekok9 02:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Thank you for helping out. - FitIndia Talk 06:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support, a cliche I know, but I thought they already were one. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 07:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Best wishes. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose One single edit between 2010/07 and 2019/09. Most edits made after 2019/11. No babels on the userpage. But i am happy to support if the user keeps the activity for the next months. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Steinsplitter, sorry. --A.Savin 13:22, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Steinsplitter. Natuur12 (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Jim makes an convincing argument. I still have some doubts about the activity level (not the level of skill) but if Jim believes that having Nat will help reduce his workload, well, let's give it a shot than. Natuur12 (talk) 00:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now: User has been inactive for years. It would be better for Nat to come back here after a few months, to better determine if Nat's behaviour is suitable as an admin or not. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Switch to   Support per GMG, Jim's comment and Nat's response. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I believe that I have spent time evaluating Nat for adminship twice now. Both times I came up saying that they need a bit more time. Having said that, they are among our most active OTRS agents, and they have experience with the tools on other projects, with no signs that they have ever misused them. They are measured and well tempered. I've corresponded with them on and off wiki and I have no concerns that they would abuse the tools if given them. They are probably more active at UDR than most who has commented so far. I do think people who are making !votes based on activity may be underestimating the time involved in processing OTRS tickets, versus the level of activity recorded on-wiki. I would urge caution in that regard. GMGtalk 00:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Everyone in here seems quite sure, that he's the temper and knowledge (at least most of it) to be an admin. So I'll support. If the worst thing that could happen would be an image to be deleted (or not), I'll take it - if he's willing to learn the last 5 percent. And no one seems to doubt that?! --Mirer (talk) 02:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Please change your signature to anything less annoying. --Krd 06:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Particularly satisfied with how professionally they dealt with ticket:2020041710009076. I had been asked to process that ticket at my talk page (Special:Permalink/421720524#درخواست راهنمایی در خصوص آپلود تصاویر), but they beat me to it in less than 2 hours! That bought my wow :) That's also why I assigned them the filemover right in less than 5 minutes: Commons:Requests_for_rights/Approved/Filemover/2020#Nat. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support // Eatcha (talk) 18:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Time spent on the project (and other numeric metrics like edit count) are ultimately just tools that we use to help us get closer to answering the important questions, which are "do we trust the editor to use the tools correctly", "do we trust the editor to interpret consensus and close discussions correctly", and "do we trust the editor to behave in a manor befitting of a community leader". If the answers to those questions are yes - as I think they are here - the numeric metrics aren't terribly important. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Excellent work at OTRS. Buidhe (talk) 00:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per GMG, Buidhe, et al. ミラP 02:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Experienced and friendly, and per GMG. But as Krd says, please change your signature. Rehman 03:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per The Squirrel Conspiracy. Jianhui67 TC 03:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good answer to my question. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I actually suggested to Nat a couple of months ago that I would sponsor him -- but KoH beat me to it. Nat is a regular contributor to Com:UNDEL where he is always measured and careful. Steinsplitter, I don't understand your objection. Nat has 6,991 edits on Commons in the last 365 days, see https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/commons.wikimedia.org/Nat. That's more or less double the total edits I had when elected. I recognize that the standards may have tightened up some, but it still represents a thoroughly acceptable record. He's also done a lot of OTRS work -- I would say that he comes to UnDR daily with one or two OTRS restorations he has approved. Giving him the Admin bit will reduce the load on Ankry,De728631, Thuresson, me,. and the three or four other regulars at UnDR. I also note that he has added the Babelbox to User:Nat after Steinsplitter's request. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support as per Jim above. Ankry (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Steinsplitter. I believe activity should be constant, and although I applaud Nat's enthusiasm, I would prefer to wait some more time before supporting (eventually). --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support De728631 (talk) 22:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support - go on -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support good judgment, willing to learn and lend a hand where needed. Storkk (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Ahmadtalk 22:42, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Jim & GMG. T CellsTalk 17:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. -- Geagea (talk) 17:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support helpful and trustworthy. clpo13(talk) 00:03, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments

  • @A1Cafel: I thank you for your comments above and greatly appreciate all the above inputs from the community regardless of how each user has decided.
I would like to address one of the above points: Out of principle, I would not and do not seek the mop myself (i.e. self-nominate). If this RfA is unsuccessful, I will not come back here after a few months as I would never self-nominate myself for an RfA. Now, if this RfA is indeed unsuccessful and if someone else decides to renominate, I will accept; and if this or a future RfA is successful, I will serve. For me, anything I do is always in service to something larger than myself, and, in this case, the Commons community. And I see the various tools as just way to better do so.
I am also quite drama adverse. I fully dislike drama. But I also recognise that situations that may result in drama are unavoidable and need to be dealt with. The way I would handle, in general, such a situation will be to find ways to de-escalate. And I find being polite, compassionate and courteous, and also trying to find ways to understand other points of view not only important, but also vital. And, when I am mistaken, I am always fully ready to admit it. That's who I am, or, at least, who I believe myself to be.
If I've gone off on a tangent here, I apologise. But I like to reiterate that I would like to thank each and every person here for their input and I greatly appreciate it regardless of their position on this RfA, and regardless of the yet-to-be-determined result of this RfA. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 20:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
In my opinion, Nat is more ready to become an admin than I was at the time of my RfA, when I had only about 4,000 edits and been highly active for only about three months. Given the volume of OTRS tickets and undeletion requests he has already handled with a low error rate, I don't see what a few more months of experience would demonstrate. -- King of ♥ 22:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Indeed. We even promoted an RfA candidate in 2017 who had about 1279 edits at that time, but got support because of their OTRS membership. If we can promote someone like Mates, why not Nat? The latter has even more experience both in adminship in general (they are a long-time sysop on enwiki) and Commons! No wonder why we are losing admins faster than gaining new ones... pandakekok9 02:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question What is the difference between self-nomination and accepting a nomination? Or why wouldn't you do the former? 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
    • @4nn1l2: Thank you for your question! The former is when a user initiates their own RfA, and the latter is accepting to proceed with a process started by another. Nothing wrong with either scenario and I personally have no problems with other users seeking the mop to nominate themselves. Whether that individual is qualified, suited, or should be an admin is up to the Community.
    For me personally, admittedly, I'm more of a reluctant person. And I feel that it would not be right to nominate myself. As an admin is a trusted Community position, I find that it would only be appropriate a candidate for adminship be nominated by other members of the Community, having earn their trust to even be considered. But that's my own personal feeling on the subject as it applies to myself.
    As I stated, I personally have no problems with other users nominating themselves. And would not be a reason I would oppose an RfA. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 07:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
    Thanks, Nat. Now you have my support. Just for the record, I am more likely to support a candidate who nominates themselves rather than being nominated by someone else. Maybe that's because I like admins to be assertive. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Requests for bureaucratship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for Oversight rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Arquivos

Podes atopar peticións para adminship arquivadas en Commons:Administrators/Archive.

Véxase tamén