Commons:Bots/Requests/RileyBot 2

RileyBot (talk · contribs) 2

Operator: Riley Huntley (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Replace "Sktooka" with "Shtooka".

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time run

Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): Six edits per minute

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): N

Programming language(s): AWB

"In Category:English pronunciation, replace the word "Sktooka" by the expression [http://shtooka.net/ Shtooka] (a link allows more easily to understand what Shtooka is)." Asking approval to do this for the whole of commons, not just in that category (excluding discussion boards and talk pages). It is up to the community to decide if "Shtooka" is linked or not. Riley Huntley (talk) 18:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I assume Sktooka is just a typo? And your bot code will be free of those ;-). And you will of course check if the word Shtooka is already linked? --Dschwen (talk) 18:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seeking input from the community anywhere else? --Dschwen (talk) 18:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, saw it on Bot requests and commented there. I would approve the wikilinking to an on-wiki landing page about Shtooka (i.e. Shtooka). --Dschwen (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I also saw that the typo was intentional. Sorry for the confusion. --Dschwen (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, forgot to link Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Shtooka_typo_in_spelling_files. Please see there for more information. Riley Huntley (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Five test edits can be found here. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bot edits look OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. --Dschwen (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its going to take a few days to do this at the current edit rate, could I please raise the epm to 15? I see no harm in it nor has there been any errors. Riley Huntley (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine with me. --Dschwen (talk) 05:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]