Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

Commons:Candidates a imáxenes destacaes

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Si creyes qu'hai dalguna semeya o imaxe na andecha abondo guapa como pa tar ente les imáxenes destacaes, entós pues amestala na llista de candidatures editando nesti enllaz. Si hay consensu xeneral depués de 10 díes, la imaxe tresferiráse a imáxenes destacaes.

PropuestesEdit

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Santorin (GR), Exomytis, Vlychada Beach -- 2017 -- 2999 (bw).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 22:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Burg-Rabenstein-Ailsbachtal-P1290149.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 19:47:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Palace of St. Michael and St. George, Corfu - September 2017.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 14:20:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 10:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Yes, that's one of the points. Besides the composition, the interesting lighting and the for Bilbao very representive wet ground, I like the absence of people which isn't easy to get these days. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support There may be some imperfections, but with a creature right out of War of the Worlds and lighting from Blade Runner the wow is huge! I would also have nominated it if I had found it first. --cart-Talk 17:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Big wow! --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de Ntra. Sra. de la Junquera, Luesma, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 60.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 09:00:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 001.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 04:45:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  •   Info Mountain trip from Sapün (1600 meters) via Medergen (2000 meters) to bridge over Sapüner bach (1400 meters). Panorama from Seebjibodem 2072 (meter). Special atmosphere at 2072 meters altitude.

All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2017.01.21.-09-Paradiski-La Plagne--Vanoise Express-Blick Richtung Les Arcs.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 19:00:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Gobierno Estatal de Baviera, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 17:11:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  •   Info Bayerische Staatskanzlei (Bavarian State Chancellery), Munich, Germany. The building, erected from 1989 to 1993 after a work of architect Ludwig Mellinger, houses the personal offices of the chancellery staff. The equestrian statue in front of the building honors Duke Otto I Wittelsbach. All by me, Poco2 17:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Poco2 17:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support--Peulle (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Excellent, restful, and the streaming clouds really help draw the viewer's attention to and from the building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Thennicke (talk) 01:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support great, I really do envy you for your 11mm lense --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose just boring --Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. A bit less sharp than I'd prefer especially on the sides, but beautiful lighting and clouds. -- King of ♠ 23:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Image:Flamenco andino 03.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 14:49:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Dunnottar Castle dt 2017 36.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 11:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Waldburg Kirche Innenraum 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 09:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Revista-anteojito-nro6.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 22:36:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info created by Manuel García Ferré - uploaded/nominated by me --Ezarateesteban 22:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - To be outstanding and worthy of a feature, it would have to be digitally restored. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree that in this case the image quality is not high enough for FP. I whole-heartedly support the idea of comic covers as FPs, though, so long as the copyright issues are handled.--Peulle (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment IMHO, wrong lincence. This isn't a photo, but a painting. --C messier (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  Question What do you mean?--Peulle (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
@Peulle: It has a public domain licence, {{PD-AR-Photo}}, which mentions with bold, Use this template exclusively for photos and NOT for drawings or other pieces of art.. And this is a drawing, not a photo. --C messier (talk) 07:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
@C messier:Yes, I see now, thanks for clearing that up. I suppose the correct one to use should have been {{PD-old}}?--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately no, Peulle, the author en:Manuel García Ferré died in 2013. --C messier (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp like the other one. Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 11:36:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Dead Horse Gap Panorama facing north-east, NSW.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 11:29:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  •   Info Dead Horse Gap, Kosciuszko National Park
  •   Info all by me -- Thennicke (talk) 11:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Thennicke (talk) 11:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Interesting terrain, flora and colors, nice clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 10:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. With that time of year approaching in the Northern Hemisphere, I can practically feel the chill in the air looking at this image. I also love the name ... Dead Horse Gap. Sounds like a place you'd find here in the U.S. in the southern Appalachians (and the town in the Alaskan Arctic). Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --fedaro (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Drum of a washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 07:50:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info Drum of a front-loaded washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440; 5 kg; 1200 RPM). All by me. -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I dont know why they didnt accept it on "Women's world" !? Its still fine shot. -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Do only women wash where you live? --cart-Talk 09:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support great idea - --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Cool. --A.Savin 10:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment CA removal needed.--Peulle (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Show me Peulle, where is it. cart you forget to vote. --Mile (talk) 11:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Comments can be made without voting. You have nothing to gain by telling people to do so, it's just rude. I don't have the time to examine photos closely right now. --cart-Talk 12:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose For such a static subject I think the composition needs to be better. The rib at the bottom isn't centered, and the bottom corners have intrusive elements. Perfect lighting and processing though -- Thennicke (talk) 12:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Info Thennicke if you crop corners you will lose lot of picture. If think this is better than croped. Static - more or less all is static. --Mile (talk) 12:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • That's true, but I still don't like the rib at the bottom. Do you still have access to this washing machine? If you could do it again with everything symmetrical I'd be supporting -- Thennicke (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Doing on that Thennicke, centralizing...but some corners will stay, cant go out, unless drum would be so big, to put camera more in. --Mile (talk) 13:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Interesting idea.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Info Now is more in center Thennicke. And some CA was there Peulle, i removed. --Mile (talk) 14:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Thennicke (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  Support--Peulle (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support What do you do if the weather is horrible but you like to shoot something? You go for the washing machine! --Basotxerri (talk) 15:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Exactly, cart, that's the image I was thinking of. And how desperate someone must be who puts some torch lights in a washing machine for shooting it!   --Basotxerri (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • You forgot: "Having to stand in the bathtub and placing the tripod in the washbasin, hoping I wouldn't slip and drop the camera in the toilet..."   I had a very small bathroom back then. (And I was very bored.) --cart-Talk 19:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 41.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 07:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  •   Info created & uploaded by Diego Delso - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Something different. I think it's interesting enough to feature. I'll be interested to see what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --A.Savin 10:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I thought of this as an FPC when I saw it on QIC, however the crop isn't symmetrical what I would prefer for this kind of image. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
    Ok, fair enough, Basotxerri,   fixed Poco2 16:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support and once more my gratitude to Ikan Poco2 16:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • De nada. You did all the work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK, you deserve my vote  . Thank you! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Nice but WB is too yellow. -- King of ♠ 00:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support HalfGig talk 01:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Abstain because I am currently a judge for WLM-US and this may yet come up as a candidate. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --cart-Talk 08:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • The sky seems a little too dark, but the house is nice.-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 15:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --fedaro (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Revista-billiken-n2079.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 22:20:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info created by Editorial Atl{antida - uploaded/nominated by me Ezarateesteban 22:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Congrats to your fourtieth birthday, Ezarate. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose imo the resolution is not really sufficient for a nom of that kind. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I agree, this is not good enough even as a historical picture for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I like the idea of posters and historical images, but   Oppose per the others.--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Way too unsharp per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Παναγία Πορταρέα 3816.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 21:07:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  •   Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 21:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • The small square where the church of Panagia Portarea is located. Apart from the church, it also features the funerary monument of Pantazis Anast. Zoulia. The church dates from the 16th century and is built by stone, including the roof top, a characteristic of the traditional architecture of Pelion, Greece.   Support -- C messier (talk) 21:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Special mood, captured very well. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice color pass, from white to yellow. Compo also well. --Mile (talk) 06:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I thought this was a painting when I saw it at thumbnail size. -- Thennicke (talk) 12:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support A little busy but I like the evening mood. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --fedaro (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support ---Pudelek (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Riisa raba varahommikul.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 20:47:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neymar Jr official presentation for Paris Saint-GermainEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 14:53:06 (UTC)

  •   Info The most expensive footballer Neymar Jr official presentation for Paris Saint-Germain, 4 August 2017.
  •   Info created by by Antoine Dellenbach (Flickr) - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too much noise (why is the ISO so high?) and the left image is of too low resolution for me to support the set.--Peulle (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose because I really don't see any of them as exceptional. Two of them are tilted and the other is a pretty standard grip-and-grin image. Daniel Case (talk) 00:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm afraid I have to agree with the other opposers --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Would support just 3rd. --Mile (talk) 06:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Me too. It's a good shot. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Nanxiong Sanying Ta 2014.01.12 08-26-52.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 13:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  •   Info Sanying Pagoda, a pagoda in Guangdong, China, built in 1009, more than 1000 years ago. All by Zhangzhugang -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This is not a bad idea and the image could work but as it is, it seems too pale and would require better lighting and sharpness to convince me. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Basotxerri, especially the comment on sharpness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Basotxerri. Daniel Case (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Basotxerri. --Mile (talk) 06:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Common black-hawk (Buteogallus anthracinus gundlachii).JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 09:28:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I think heat haze followed by poor post-processing to sort it did for the lions! Charles (talk) 15:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Cirsium vulgare. Uitgebloeide Speerdistel Cirsium vulgare in verval.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 07:18:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Aspen groves in Öhed.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 18:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Benasque - Aigualluts - Árbol muerto 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 18:18:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Spain
  •   Info All by me. -- Basotxerri (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Reminds you of Ansel Adams. Note that BW does hide unsharpness, and the foreground grass would look like a blob of fuzzy green carpet if it were a color image. -- King of ♠ 01:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Outstanding. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Reminds me to much of Yosemite to say no. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Mile (talk) 07:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

*  Oppose   weak support per KoH basically. Any chance to redevelop your raw? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes, I can, but sorry, I don't understand exactly what you want me to do. The front part is unsharp because I shot this using a 120 mm eq. telephoto lens. If you tell me what to improve I could try to do so. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Maybe I was being unfair. The foreground looks blotchy to me, so I assumed that the image was simply overprocessed. Your technical explanation is convincing, I'll change my vote. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Don't worry Martin, I understand your arguments and you just express your opinion. Maybe the next time I'll have to be more conscious about the depth of field but of course it can't be the same image in the same place. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus) female.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 15:17:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Santorin (GR), Fira -- 2017 -- 2598.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 14:23:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • I can try it, but I don't think it's moiré. --XRay talk 18:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Fixed You're right. I haven't seen the problem yesterday. Moiré removed. --XRay talk 15:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I have to demur on this: it's certainly a good photo, but I don't think it's special enough to warrant a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
  •   Support The angle, the Greek national colors ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support per Daniel -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Neutral, tending to oppose. The lamp is disturbing, and Santorini is not the whole Greece (one can see these colors almost only in the Cyclades, on tourist advertising posters and on the greek flag...), this is not very far from a "tourist/postcard snapshot" (as often said here) but I find this very inspiring regarding the composition. I think it needs a crop at left, and the blue and dark parts suffer of (chromatic) noise. My vote is provisional, it needs reflexion...--Jebulon (talk) 08:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I kinda like the colour scheme, but I'm not really wowed - I also have this sneaking feeling about the quality; it just doesn't seem quite crisp enough.--Peulle (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I do actually think this is exceptional, but I do agree with Jebulon that the lamp disturbs the minimalism. I'd be interested to see it (and its post) cropped out -- Thennicke (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • May be. But cropping out the post the table and the chairs are nearly in the middle. IMO that's not the best composition. --XRay talk 11:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support nice composition --Pudelek (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 13:14:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria
  •   Info 240° panorama from Hochanger mountain (1,682 metres (5,518 ft)) near Turnau, Styria, Austria. ATTENTION: this file is really huge! --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Awesome piece. I was wondering if it was a little overexposed but on second thought I don't think it is. The sharpness is good and the depth is amazing; you can really see everything from birds to bonfires, from ravines to logging tracks. As for the size, well, you know it's a big image when I have to open it on my gaming rig. :) --Peulle (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Brilliant technically I'm sure, but it crashed my PC. We need a better way to assess these panoramas. And why so much grass in the foreground? Charles (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I propose to cut off the lowest part with the unsharp grass --Llez (talk) 17:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support, though I'd like to see how it looks with some of the grass cropped out. Charles, did you use the zoom viewer? I used the non-flash one and didn't have a problem this time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik (edits) 20:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Impressive size. A pity that it is not 360°. The unsharp bottom ruins FP to me at the moment. --Milseburg (talk) 20:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 21:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Past a certain point, you can't get more resolution (due to diffraction) without having the foreground being unsharp. There's always focus stacking, but technologically we're not yet at the point that we should demand it for all such FPs. -- King of ♠ 00:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support crazy --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Pogled od Crn kamen Jablanica.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 08:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Altenstein-Kapelle-Ruine-266191.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 21:43:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Support--LivioAndronico (talk) 09:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice atmosphere and colours and although it seems somewhat insignificant, I like how book on the table can be seen entirely. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2013.05.18.-24-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Vierfleck-Weibchen.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:48:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • No mistake! See my answer in the note. Look carefully, then you'll see what it is. This is a single shot. And I didn't use any optrions (what ever you mean). At most I used extension rings. A lot of time is gone by now, so I can't remember exactly. I made the picture in the year 2013. --Hockei (talk) 17:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I get it, its other part of edge. --Mile (talk) 17:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  --Hockei (talk) 18:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 21:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Skimmers)

File:MB&F HMX Black Badger Blue.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info created by MB&F - uploaded by MB&F - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Very clean photo, but please add to your file description the fact that this is a watch, because it's not clear just by looking at it, and I think supplying just a link isn't optimal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose For description. I had to see official page what am i looking at. Can anyone read what time is it !? Otherwise good commercial shot. --Mile (talk) 08:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others about the description. Documentation for an FP should be just as good as the photo. Regarding the photo, it is no doubt a very good photo but I simply fail to be wow-ed by yet another advertisement using black on black to make their product look cool. It looks rather flat and clinical. --cart-Talk 09:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • It's a clear FP photography-wise in my book, but   Oppose per the others re documentation. It really is necessary to get these things done before nominating.--Peulle (talk) 10:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Conditional support per Ikan pending better documentation. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:MB&F Arachnophobia Black.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:16:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info created by MB&F - uploaded by MB&F - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support, but again, please add a prose description to the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose insufficient description Ezarateesteban 20:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As above...seems like copying Jeff Deboer. --Mile (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 10:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per others. Daniel Case (talk) 14:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Auguste Mariette photography.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2017 at 21:01:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  •   Info created by Nadar - uploaded by Jebulon - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Kasir (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Respectfully, I mildly   Oppose, because as good as this is, I think the restoration process isn't complete and the dark shape just above and to the viewer's left of the man's head is probably just a product of the damage shown in the original scan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Thank you Kasir for choice. I did my best with this very difficult restoration. I think perfection requested is not of this world...--Jebulon (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Question Why would it be so difficult to make the dark area about the same as the rest of the background? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Try by yourself, and you will see !  --Jebulon (talk) 08:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the best version --Kasir (talk) 19:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
That's an argument for VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Already VI.--Jebulon (talk) 08:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ikan. I agree it was a spirited restoration, and you started from very far back, but I don't think the result is up there with our other featured restorations. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  Weak support I think this is the best it's going to get. Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes, thank you.   Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 11:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  Support--Peulle (talk) 23:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Spb 06-2017 img47 Church on the Blood.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 08:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  •   Info Bird's eye-view of Church of the Savior on Blood and Griboyedov Canal in Saint Petersburg, Russia - all by A.Savin --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The overall tone is too grey-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 09:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think this should be rotated into portrait. Perhaps anticlock. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support for the general composition.--Peulle (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Great image. Birds' eye views are always awesome to look at, even if (according to a photographer I was chatting with the other day) they're often judged as a fad in more "serious" photo competitions. -- Thennicke (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice, good job. --Selbymay (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Quite visually arresting. But I wonder whether it would look better with a bit of noise reduction. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
      Comment I did my usual portion (for Phantom always more than for DSLR) in Lightroom. Some remaining noise in darker areas is inevitable, but I'm eagerly awaiting a Phantom with more megapixels, less noise, and not much more weight and price... )) --A.Savin 09:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Unsual view and it works. --C messier (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Because it looks like some kind of weird steampunk machinery. :) --cart-Talk 18:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- King of ♠ 05:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support per cart. It has the technical shortcomings of most drone pictures, but it's an arresting view that only the drone could have gotten. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Colin (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --fedaro (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 00:36:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Swiss Camp (Greenland), aerial photography 4.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 00:34:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  •   Info created, uploaded and nominated by Capricorn4049
  •   Oppose Sorry but I'm not seeing the quality I expect from an FP; the detail is just not high enough.--Peulle (talk) 12:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - This photo is pretty noisy in the sky and last time I checked, it had apparently been declined at QIC for technical reasons. I'm not seeing anything about the photo that's so outstanding in other ways as to prompt an FP designation in spite of that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support – Interesting composition, very good colors, sharp enough, for me not too noisy -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Very harsh environment, technically too cold to fly a drone, extraordinary location. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 03:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Faust tower - Maulbronn Monastery.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2017 at 20:00:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Comment - As a musician, of course I know the Faust story. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I just focus on the picture. Its story has nothing to do with me. -- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 04:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Just a QI for me. -- Colin (talk) 17:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Rdeča mušnica (Amanita muscaria).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2017 at 05:52:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
  •   Info created & uploaded by Mile - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Awesome amanita picture! The depth of field is about as close to ideal as possible, and the level of detail is outstanding. There's also a tiny little insect on the mushroom's shaft - can any of you identify it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Great photo. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Johann. I especially like how the background fades to black (making the mushroom stand out), and yet the lighting is even -- Thennicke (talk) 07:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanx Ikan Kekek for nomination. And true, Thennicke, i was looking for a mushroom which i can dissolve with black background, so object become more clear. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support, I just wish this would be in portrait format --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --cart-Talk 09:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Excellent @PetarM:, but portrait format for me too. Charles (talk) 11:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Info Interesting question Charles, Uoaei1, more topic for me. I asked myselve while ago, why people use mostly panorama and not portrait at mushrooms. Probably because of T form, otherwise i even tried portrait; i didnt even shot, what i saw on viewfinder was enough to abandon portrait. And mostly they do it in panorama. So answer here is no. I dont tell that is always necessary, but in my case was. And probably in most FPs on Commons also. For checking more see Fungi photos. Google can admit that. I saw situtation for portrait shot, as they grow like that. Someday i will try. --Mile (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Well it would be silly to not vote when anyone wanting to use the image cropped can crop it. Charles (talk) 13:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

*  Support -- Giancarlolozza (talk) 13:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Giancarlolozza, thanks for dropping by this board and for your vote. What's the rule in terms of eligibility to vote? I don't see 50 prior edits, but he's been a Commoner since no later than 9 July 2008, so does he become eligible by virtue of length of membership, providing he signs in and doesn't just vote using his IP address? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
    That IP address is an open proxy. LX (talk, contribs) 15:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • So I guess the vote is invalid. Why can open proxies be blocked on sight? Only some of them that have a history of trolling or vandalism, I think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
IP not allowed to vote. -- Colin (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Perfect!--Ermell (talk) 19:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I, too, would prefer it in portrait, but I accept Mile's reasoning for why he kept it this way. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Great sharpness, a worthy FP. Also a VI, I think.--Peulle (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @Peulle so far just Italian Wiki has article for this variant of mushroom, but enough for VI i think. I will put it.--Mile (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 06:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Sharp! Mile, what lens did you use? --Basotxerri (talk) 19:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Info Its macro lens-Zuiko 60 mm. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Another great stacking shot -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose For me it is not a FP. The quality of the mushroom is very good. But not more. There is no composition at all. The background is just black. I have no feeling when I look at it. --Hockei (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Colin (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --fedaro (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)