You may get a hint by looking at the previous review? It is a question of the ability to localize to other languages. My proposal was actually to have it as an SVG(!) with an embedded bitmap of have vector line drawing lengends prepared for localization to other languages. That would make the image more valuable as making a derived, e.g., Hindu version from the English one would be easy. The poor mans solution is to have numbered legends and then have the labels in the image page. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral My concern here is that this illustrates Edward VI as Prince of Wales, not as King of England. Thus, to nitpick, it depicts "Edward, Prince of Wales" rather than "Edward VI of England". I'm not sure if this is something we should concern ourselves with, so I am opening an MVR between this and Image:Edward VI Scrots c1550.jpg. – flamurai02:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have changed the license from PD-art to PD-old, and under PD-old I don't believe this is proved copyvio. The instructions on the PD-art tag say that the UK would likely support the photographer's rights, but that has not been demonstrated. We set a very dangerous precedent for the quality of our art coverage if we assume that any image scanned from a UK book is disallowed. I will also look for a US publication with the same image (I think I have one). - PKM16:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
