Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:3 Broadgate.jpg

File:3 Broadgate.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2020 at 20:10:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
Info all by Bobulous -- Bobulous (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this is suitably sharp and striking, but let's see what the Commoners think. -- Bobulous (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very pretty building. However, the whites on the building at the top right are overexposed, and the blue channel is clipped everywhere including the sky. Also, the bottom left corner is slightly distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for now. The building certainly has the 'wow-factor' and the image quality is fairly good. I also like the people because they give a sense of scale. But could you perhaps go back to the RAW and darken the sky? The blown highlights in the sky on the left at the moment are easily fixable from RAW and they make it sub-FP to me. (there are blown highlights on the building at the right too) Cmao20 (talk) 01:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice composition and a beautiful building per KoH. If you dial the sliders back on the overexposure on the right and fix some CA on edges on that building, I would support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've switched from DPP to RawTherapee and produced a second version with reconstructed highlights, but the Wikimedia Commons "Upload file" page keeps giving an error (but only after four minutes, which is the amount of time it takes my connection to upload a 36MiB file). So I'm trying to get the new version in place, but it's proving difficult. --Bobulous (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. There's definitely an FP here though; I'd get a little closer or crop tighter to get rid of that planter (The two men I can live with, though some people here probably wouldn't). I like the front of the building; it makes me say "Sir, it looks like someone cut the building open to steal our pipe organ!") Daniel Case (talk) 01:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've been fighting for days to try to get a replacement uploaded, but I get a Wikimedia error every time (reported in T247454). Even regenerated and alternate versions lead to failure, so Wikimedia really doesn't want the file to be replaced. (Can we count that as a vote of support from Wikimedia for the current version?) --Bobulous (talk) 18:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]