Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blåvandshuk3.jpg
File:Blåvandshuk3.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2012 at 19:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Comment Please rotate the photo to get a horizontal horizon over the sea level and use this toolserver to get the location template. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)- Comment The horizon tilt is minor but oddly distracting. The real problem with this image is there is no sense of subject. Reading the image description is less than helpful in that regard. The image rests uncomfortably between a landscape and a photo of a person/structure. 131.137.245.207 08:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- The images shows the dunes of Blåvandshuk. Whats the problem with it? --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- The image description only said Blåvandshuk so adding "dunes" helps. As to the problem, while this is technically sound image I would say it, like serveral other current nominations, lacks wow. It also lacks a certain internal coherecy as to the theme with the individual taking centre stage, the beach setting with sports going on and the "bunker" all providing distractions instead of adding to the image. A wider perspective to take in more of the beach and expanse of the dunes may have served your purpose better. As it is this is just a documentation photo of a pile of grass covered sand next to a beach. Opinions are like arseholes... everyone has one. 131.137.245.207 14:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- I like this landscape very much and I like the composition of paths, grass areas and the sea. But for sure: not every likes this landscape or is impressed in the same way. Those who like it will support it, those who dislike it will not. Nevertheless: no reason to express bawdy analogies. --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- I am glad you like it. I would hate to think you submit photos you don't like. As to my quip being "bawdy": If it offended my apologies, but it wasn't directed at anyone and you parrotted its meaning in your own reply. 131.137.245.206 09:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- I like this landscape very much and I like the composition of paths, grass areas and the sea. But for sure: not every likes this landscape or is impressed in the same way. Those who like it will support it, those who dislike it will not. Nevertheless: no reason to express bawdy analogies. --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- The image description only said Blåvandshuk so adding "dunes" helps. As to the problem, while this is technically sound image I would say it, like serveral other current nominations, lacks wow. It also lacks a certain internal coherecy as to the theme with the individual taking centre stage, the beach setting with sports going on and the "bunker" all providing distractions instead of adding to the image. A wider perspective to take in more of the beach and expanse of the dunes may have served your purpose better. As it is this is just a documentation photo of a pile of grass covered sand next to a beach. Opinions are like arseholes... everyone has one. 131.137.245.207 14:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- The images shows the dunes of Blåvandshuk. Whats the problem with it? --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Joydeep (talk) 15:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Oppose No Wow + tilted horizon + unbalanced composition + you should extend the description (e.g. what's the concrete structure on top of the dune? a bunker or just a stairway?) --Martin Kraft (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:19, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
