Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boeing 737-400 Centralwings 2.JPG

File:Boeing 737-400 Centralwings 2.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2009 at 13:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Łukasz Golowanow, Maciej Hypś, Konflikty.pl - uploaded by Airwolf - nominated by Albertus teolog -- Albertus teolog (talk) 13:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 13:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Very nice shot of this subject, but I can't decide one way or the other. More thought required. --Relic38 (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info I've cropped the image just a little bit so that there is not too much free space in the picture. Airwolf (talk) 12:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Living in the vicinity of a major airport (Amsterdam Schiphol), I fail to see what is so special about a Boeing 737. I can see several dozens of them each day when I bother to look up.;) MartinD (talk) 18:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Request I would like to know - i.e. hear opinions from other contributors - whether such a reason for opposing is valid; in my opinion it is contradictory with the essential basis of Commons in general, and FPC in particular, which is: to gather media and select the best of those. One could easily say that there is nothing special in pictures of bugs (there are how many? 200 billion of them in the world?) or buildings (5 million people see the Statue of Liberty every day) or most cars (there's a Skoda Superb parking in front of my house every day). However, when a photo of a bug, building, or car is of satisfactory quality, it gets promoted. By the way, how many times have you seen a Centralwings airplane at Schiphol? Airwolf (talk) 19:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please voice your opinion here, and take part in the discussion. -- JovanCormac 06:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pablo000 (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, too banal --Vprisivko (talk) 20:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support OK, the crop has helped. As for the specialness of a subject, I leave that out of my voting or I don't vote on that subject (for me that includes most non-photographic images). "One person's trash is another person's treasure". For that reason I don't ~~trash~~oppose subjects just because I cannot see the specialness of it. That's my . --Relic38 (talk) 01:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose boring, it's just a plane and not even an interesting point of view. I have tons of those pictures in my archive. --Björn König (talk) 14:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]