Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cour d'honneur est palais abbatial de l'Abbaye de la Cambre.jpg

File:Cour d'honneur est palais abbatial de l'Abbaye de la Cambre.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2019 at 23:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info created by Fawaz.tairou - uploaded by Fawaz.tairou - nominated by Fawaz.tairou -- Fawaz.tairou (talk) 23:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fawaz.tairou (talk) 23:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my comments on your other nomination. FPs are supposed to be among the very best on this site. Do you really think this is one of the very best? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, even no QI because of the cropped car --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a bad idea, still the viewing angle is too narrow. I’d expect the building and the central lawn area to be fully within the frame. Maybe you should learn how to stitch panoramic images from multiple shots, this could have been helpful here. Then, most of the image appears to be in dull lighting. Maybe you ought to brighten your images before publishing them – post-processing has always been an important part of the photographic work, even before digital imaging. Still there’s the image quality, the poor level of detail a phone cam is capable of. Have a look at some FPs and compare them with your work at 100 percent view to see what I mean. --Kreuzschnabel 18:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- How would you like this one? 5 minutes in Gimp: Perspective correction, crop, tone mapping, gradation. --Kreuz schnabel 18:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. For me it doesn't have very much wow compositionally, and the image quality is probably only just QI. A useful picture, but not more than that. Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As noted in other !votes, this could have been a great panoramic. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]