Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gemini Residence, Islands Brygge, Copenhagen.jpg
File:Gemini Residence, Islands Brygge, Copenhagen.jpg, not featured
edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2013 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by -- Bob Collowan (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Bob Collowan (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC)- I do a gree with Poco, thinking about it again. There is quite a bit of potential in terms of composition. I'll go with
Neutral, too. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 11:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- I do a gree with Poco, thinking about it again. There is quite a bit of potential in terms of composition. I'll go with
- Support Nice. A bit of small blown-out sections but not concerning. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Opposeshallow, little visual impact, too technical and therefore not very emotional, the light is good but despite this you are unable to enjoy the colors and floor areas of materials, fundamental for this kind of photo--Pava (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)- Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:19, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --M49314 (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 16:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Selbymay (talk) 16:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral Quality is good (apart from some clipping) but I believe that there is room for improvement in lighting and composition. The current result is not really spectacular IMHO. There is for example a nice bridge to play with, blue hour, night shot, angles,.... I am talking about something like this or this. By the way the interior of the building is at least as nice as the exterior and we don't have any shots in Commons... Poco2 11:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
