Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden Gate Park San Francisco December 2016 003.jpg

File:Golden Gate Park San Francisco December 2016 003.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2017 at 04:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural (technically manmade but there's no better category for manmade natural scenery)
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing of interesting for me (no wow) sorry--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Livioandronico2013: If an image is not interesting for me I can not say that it is bad. Than my vote is neutral or I say nothing. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent composition, very good colors. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~* Neutral~~ As much as I'd like to support, it's the white car in the middle that brakes the deal for me. Any chance to clone it out? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The car brakes the deal?

Good one! Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Hah! The best unintentional pun I've made in quite a while! ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would be rather hard to remove because of its reflection, and I don't really like altering reality by too much. How about I burn the area a bit - would that be enough for you? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After reconsidering I'll give my weak support. We should leave reality alone ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm not bothered by the car, although it would not affect my !vote if it were cloned out. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PumpkinSky talk 14:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: If the car can be cloned well, I'm for.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see here a quite ordinary city park scene and the longer I look at the picture the less I can discover the reason for an FP eligibility. Where is the WOW effect? Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 20:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info I've burned the car in the middle to make it a little less distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I understand you want to get the entire reflection of the largest tree in the photo, but the most interesting thing to me is the forms of the vegetation themselves, not their reflections, and I think I'm also reacting to the amount of water in the photo as feeling unbalanced to me. I feel like I'd support the photo if you were to crop out about the nearest 2/5 of the water (in other words, a bit before you get to the coot, which should remain in the picture). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI is fine for such a ordinary image. -- Pofka (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]