Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hausen im Wiesental - Hebelhaus.jpg
File:Hausen im Wiesental - Hebelhaus.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2014 at 18:59:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)- Support -- -donald- (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality, nice house, but I don't see anything special here to make it FP. Sorry. Yann (talk) 14:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)- Oppose Totally agree with Yann. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support The light is a bit harsh on the house at left but good and nice image IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- For the opponents: please tell me how you would wish to be this object photographed in a featured way? This nice building (by the way it's a listed building and has a historic importance) is shown isoleted from disturbing pedestrians, parking cars or other stuff. It's shown in a nice light and the flag is flying in a nice way so you can see it very well. So we have a idyllic and calm mood. By the way: the flag is shown only in days of Hebel memorial, so it's very seldom. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Obvious encyclopedic value. --JLPC (talk) 06:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. This is QI. Wladyslaw, not all subjects are special enough for a straightforward photo of them to merit featuring. Being listed or historically important isn't much relevant to the image on the screen. -- Colin (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- of course, I have forgotten to photograph a cute animal baby or a flower, next time maybe. --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 06:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
