Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heres looking at you.jpg
File:Heres looking at you.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2017 at 02:51:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)- Support Image is exceptional. The narrow depth of field fully isolates the subject, and brings all focus to the intricate textures and features of the fish, and its complex blending of colors. No complaints from me. WClarke 04:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Question This is a really cool image! Is there any chance of identifying the species? I think it would be very sad that such a picture would stay with these three global categories. --Basotxerri (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment Agree with Basotxerri and even if the name of the file is very to the point and funny, it should be changed. Puns and jokes in file names are unfortunately not a part of FP names. Please, try to come up with something that is more encyclopedic as well as something you find appropriate. --cart-Talk 08:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Not exceptional. Eye socket not all in focus. Charles (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)- Support Doesn't matter. -- KennyOMG (talk) 17:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I miss the "Wow"-effect. --TheAmerikaner (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Woow. The shallow DOF drives the eye the forefront of the eye of the fish, and the use of diagonals and lines makes up a great composition. The categorization is not good enough though. The fish should be identified. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 14:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
