Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hotel Iberostar Málaga Playa Torrox Costa 2014.jpg

File:Hotel Iberostar Málaga Playa Torrox Costa 2014.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2014 at 08:58:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info No historic building or church :) High resolution panorama (62 Mpx) of Hotel Hotel Iberostar Málaga Playa in Torrox-Costa
all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support makes me want to go on vacation. Now! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  Support Great detail, subject, composition and lighting, good job! Poc o² 09:31, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment Btw, could you improve the symmetry (the right side is closer to the camera than the left side)? Poc o² 11:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(sorry, forgotten your comment): Yesterday I spent several hours on the improvement of the photo in order to check a suggesion by Colin regarding another projection (Panini General), see my discussion page for details. During the work I also tried to improve the symmetry but finally my disappointing insight, probabaly you can give a comment on it on my talk page, was that I still prefer the version I have nominated here. It simply looks better if I use the trees at the left and right as framing than strictly align the center to the lines on the floor. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:11, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment Did you do a version without the trees on the left and right... i.e a few steps closer perhaps? Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately not. I really like the trees here. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They work as a framing device but the one of the left is a bit distracting given it is the one large dark element in the image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I though you mean the palm trees but you mean the smaller ones at the very left and right. Nonetheless is does not change the situation that I only have image material from the given positon. Indeed, my idea was to use them as framing. Cropping is no option because the pool building at the left would be cropped. I could try to brighten the left tree, what do you think? --Tuxyso (talk) 18:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably   Done: I've brightened the tree at the very left. Do you think it is better now? --Tuxyso (talk) 19:55, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tuxyso, can you spend a comment to my question above about the lack of symmetry? Poc o² 20:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco -- Colin (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent sharpening --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 11:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid the panorama distorsion does not work for me, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- What exactly does not work for you? What had you done better? Where do you see problems with distortion? In the foreground or at the building? --Tuxyso (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Shortly: I should not see this if I where at the place of the camera.--Jebulon (talk) 14:05, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm willing to adjudicate if someone will pay me to take the place of the camera. My verification of the perspective and field of view should take around two weeks. Thanks in advance. -- Colin (talk) 21:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you, but no need. If some can wait a few months, I'll be there (or close too) in next july.--Jebulon (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - But don't forget to take new motives besides all the motives I have taken bad photos of (you made a similiar comment on my Alhambra photos) during my visit in Andalusia. Should I add a category Photos of Andalusia by Tuxyso to simplify your work? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - Oh sorry dear Tuxyso, I don't want to hurt you, and your pictures are very good ! I have a mental problem with panorama pictures and subsequent deformations/distorsions, that's all. And the rest of your productions is always very interesting, I don't think I can do better ! That was just a joke, answering to Colin's joke. Sorry again, no offense, really.--Jebulon (talk) 17:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        This time I have indeed understood the joke from Colin (which is not a natural consequences in a foreign language). But I have clearly understood your statement the way that you will make a better photo when you are in the region. BTW: I have a non-panoramic wide-angle version of the motive but imho the high resolution makes the difference here due to the plenty of details, take e.g. a look on the magazine the girl at the very left is reading :) --Tuxyso (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 06:09, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. --DXR (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /J e e 15:12, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas