Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inspiration4 Launch (210915-F-CG053-1003).jpg

File:Inspiration4 Launch (210915-F-CG053-1003).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Others
Info created by Staff Sgt. JT Armstrong - uploaded by BugWarp - nominated by MarioJump83 -- Mario Jump 83! 12:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mario Jump 83! 12:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BugWarp (talk) 13:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are a lot of dust spots. This might be under Astrophotography program - maybe, but i dont resolve between many burned pixles, stars and dead pixles and some whith blurred track. Above all uncalibrated color space. All could be corrected, to become FP. Otherwise scenic view. --Mile (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Stars make traces at this exposure time. So, every sharp dot here is a hot pixel. The dark spots are dust on the sensor. Altogether too many for me. --Kreuz schnabel 08:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The colors don't display well on my screen. Also, heavy blacks, the image is too contrasted. Buildings leaning in -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Certainly has wow, but the building on the right looks odd and I don't love the red lens flare. I'm also seeing numerous dust spots, as mentioned by Mile above, and they tip my vote to opposing. ~~Good for a VIC nom if nothing else.~~ -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Verticals straightened

Oppose The image is literally "lying" about the launch angle. Get the verticals straight (at the further expense of quality), and presto! it’s going off vertically. --Kreuz schnabel 08:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks. I rescind my comment about VIC. Your version should be the nominee there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Wow factor is enough for me to ignore the technical shortcomings, but the scientific misunderstanding it offers from launch angle is unpleasant. --IamMM (talk) 12:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral pending straightening the trajectory out. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]