Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Janki Mandir.JPG
File:Janki Mandir.JPG, not featured., not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2016 at 15:55:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by Adutta.np - uploaded by Adutta.np - nominated by Adutta.np -- https://abhishekdutta.org/ (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- https://abhishekdutta.org/ (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Too sky, need more sharpening (maybe you could use a lower f and not f/10), and chromatic aberration (see image note) --The Photographer (talk) 16:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I agree with The Photographer that you should crop at least half the sky from the top. I'm not a big technical expert on photography (many of the other regulars here are), but it looks to me like the whole picture is too bright. The whites on the facade of the building need to stand out a little more from the surroundings, but they can't without more contrast between them. Maybe one of the others will have specific technical suggestions of the best way to do this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Jiel (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
alt version
edit- Neutral However, sharpening problems in right and left bottom are there. --The Photographer (talk) 20:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I like the composition of the alternate version. I agree that some sharpening would help. The buildings to the left of the Janki Mandir are notably unsharp. And I still think upping the contrast between the buildings and surrounding sky and ground, if justifiable based on how it actually looked, would be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Support I like this version. --Halavar (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support --George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose overexposed, chromatic abberrations, not really sharp - sorry. It is really a great motive, but everything must be perfect here in FP. Je-str (talk) 14:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Jiel (talk) 23:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results: