Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:June16protestTreefong16.jpg
File:June16protestTreefong16.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2020 at 03:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by hf9631 - uploaded by hf9631 - nominated by Hf9631 -- Hf9631 (talk) 03:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Hf9631 (talk) 03:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, there is nothing sharp. -- -donald- (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)- Oppose per donald. Too bad; it looks good as a thumbnail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Info Thanks for the comments. What if it is intentionally blurred the faces of the crowd, for the sake of preventing the ascertainment from the government and the despotism? --Hf9631 (talk) 11:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Comment I doubt that would work (you really think the Chinese authorities are stymied that easily?), but the reason for the blurring doesn't bear on the quality of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I see your point. Thanks again for the evaluation. (We are just striving in agony. Nobody is safe in our city these days.) --Hf9631 (talk) 23:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment You have my full sympathy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose It would be easy to blur just the faces in the foreground and leave everything else sharp if the understandable need to protect protesters' identities were the issue. However, not only is everything unsharp, there's a lot of noise in the back. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
