Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kairo Ibn Tulun Moschee BW 4.jpg

File:Kairo Ibn Tulun Moschee BW 4.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2011 at 19:03:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kairo Ibn Tulun Moschee BW 4.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kairo Ibn Tulun Moschee BW 4.jpg

625

266

2055

1338

3476

1898

Something like this would have been a better composition IMO --Slaunger (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by-- Berthold Werner (talk) 19:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 19:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The sky is a bit noisy, but it doesn't affect the general quality. Nice view and encyclopedic value. I was there in 1991, during a sand storm... -- MJJR (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral IMO Somewhat unsharp. This is apperant at the tower with the spiral staircase.--Snaevar (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment The border of the bottom shadow has strong CA. This should be easy to fix though... --Murdockcrc (talk) 17:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see chromatic aberration, it's just a bit boring. A very good image all the same. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support nice Bunnyfrosch (talk) 23:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice view and encyclopedic value, but IMO somewhat unsharp and visible CA. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Info CA should be better now. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, CA is much better now, you have my vote, great image. --Murdockcrc (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good technical quality and interesting subject. But I do not like the strong shadow and the composition. The composition is a compromise between either a strictly symmetric composition with the main tower in the corner centered and a rule of thirds composition with the two towers aligned with rules of thirds vertical lines. For me this in-between choise does not work and makes it appear uninteresting. I think a better composition would have been something along the lines indicated with my annotation. --Slaunger (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:17, 6 January 2011 (UTC)