Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:London Victoria Station by Toni Frissell 1951.jpg

File:London Victoria Station by Toni Frissell 1951.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2009 at 08:06:20

Info created by American photographer Toni Frissell - uploaded by User:Mu - nominated by User:Aylaross -- Aylaross (talk) 08:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aylaross (talk) 08:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much dust spots and fibers/hairs and annoying color tint. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support At the resolution you could make a nice big print and the dust spots would be barely noticeable. There is some posterization but I don't mind as it's a quite beautiful picture. --Calibas (talk) 02:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Strong support, if there is such a thing here.;) MartinD (talk) 11:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support great composition --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avala (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Simpledot (talk) 22:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aesthetically fine, very good --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Daniel78 on the technical points. Maedin\^talk 12:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Daniel78. Lycaon (talk) 18:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 07:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - weak quality, not special enough aesthetically. Downtowngal (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe it's not perfect technically, but aesthetic impressiveness overcompensate that--Tired time (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It doesn't have just a little posterisation, it has extreme posterisation. Probably as a result of a poor scan or poor processing. Diliff (talk) 08:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel and David  Richard  [®]  21:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\^talk 19:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]