Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg

File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2010 at 11:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info everything by Cayambe --Cayambe (talk) 11:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info Starting on January 2011, the Council of the European Union will be held in this building during three months in the year.
Support -- Cayambe (talk) 11:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you could remove that tiny little thing in the lower right corner it would be excellent to me. --Ikiwaner (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you. --Cayambe (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

now happily

Support --Ikiwaner (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Any1s (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support really nice work --mathias K 14:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well mastered reflection on structure, which also brings information. --Myrabella (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; really nice reflections and colours but imho bad crop on all sides especially left (and right). Also needs to be rotated clock-wise, imho. Sorry, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not to be harsh, but the composition is atrocious. What exactly are we focusing on here with this subject and how is it a great educational photo? I can't even tell if the large gray structure in front is actually part of the foreground or not. Steven Walling 22:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no COM:FOP Luxembourg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Pieter and Steven. Lycaon (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - the overall composition does not work here for me, though it is a very interesting photo. Jonathunder (talk) 03:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Avala (talk) 10:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination. Cause: copyright-issue (see the deletion request stamp). With a Thank you to the reviewers. --Cayambe (talk) 10:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please, don't withdraw this nomination. I think, the photo won't be deleted. The nomination has good chances. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info I herewith reactivate my nomination, sorry for that. --Cayambe (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 11:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 12:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose suspicion of copyvio, also per DerHexer --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is not a valid reason to oppose. We judge the image quality here. If it's considered a copyvio it will be deleted, otherwise not. There is another place to vote for this topic. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's valid reason to oppose. I can't support an image which has no impeccable copyright status. Strictly speaking I would aid a felony with supporting something like that (hard expressed). A picture which could shown something what is not allowed to show on photos can never be a featured picture imo. And I also write „per DerHexer“: the crop at right and left is much too small. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is a perfectly valid reason to oppose. --80.220.135.43 04:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture