Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Main beach-pichilemu-2010eq.jpg

File:Main beach-pichilemu-2010eq.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 20:57:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Diego Grez - uploaded by Archanamiya - nominated by Diego Grez -- Diego Grez ^{return fire} 20:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diego Grez ^{return fire} 20:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, the sky is really, really bad--Mbz1 (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad stitch (look at the boats, for example), poor quality. --ianaré (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sky isn't the only problem, tere's a very bad stitch on the right, and the quality detail is too low --Cesco77 (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, to be honest, you can't ask for more if you only got a cellphone in an emergency situation :-) Diego Grez ^{return fire} 18:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here's another version. Neutral. ZooFari 03:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mattwj2002 (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC) - Historic significant because of the earthquake, location, and time.[reply]
Oppose bad stitch (look at the boats, for example), poor quality. --ianaré (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Historically significant indeed, but no FP quality -- Any1s (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]