Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ohio Stadium Overhead.jpg

File:Ohio Stadium Overhead.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2021 at 04:49:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Lectrician2 - uploaded by Lectrician2 - nominated by Lectrician2 -- Lectrician2 (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lectrician2 (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good VI, possible QI (though some people will criticize it for the lack of perspective correction at QIC), but not inspiring enough or large and detailed enough for me to consider it one of the greatest photos on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support We don't have that many high vantage point of view photo of architectural subjects (even though good drones are becoming commons). This one could be of better quality but is perfectly framed in my opinion. - Benh (talk) 09:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Benh --Co mmon ists 15:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Very well-executed, with a good composition and the right lighting conditions (I don't think this subject would look very good on a harsh sunny day). But it's missing a bit of oomph (such as shooting at twilight which also has even lighting but would be more aesthetically pleasing), and 9 MP on a 1/2.3" sensor is not state-of-the-art anymore for a consumer-priced drone. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Aerial photo or not, I think we can do better than the distorted background, and those two dorm towers are a little distracting ... I wonder if a picture looking the other direction, towards the arena, might work better. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I actually have a photo from the other side, but I just don't think it has the full effect. The 1/2 dome, and the score board add a lot. Personally, the lighting on the other photo is better, but it just doesn't have the full illustrative value. Lectrician2 (talk) 04:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]