Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passiflora edulis flower in Hong Kong Mar 9 2013.JPG
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2013 at 13:58:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by User:Earth100 - uploaded by User:Earth100 - nominated by User:Earth100 -- Earth100 (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Earth100 (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp at full resolution. Tomer T (talk) 15:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Tomer - unsharp. shouldn't be QI either, don't know how it got QI status. Also it is not a very flattering image of this flower, consider for instance this image. --SuperJew (talk) 19:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment was promoted here by Bgag with the comment Good quality. --SuperJew (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment also other images of this user which have QI status are rather low quality. See images: Ipomoea cairica, Passion fruit, Passiflora coccinea, Bombax ceiba. --SuperJew (talk) 20:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Artifacts and sharpened noise at full resolution. Poor technical quality. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 23:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 6 June 2013 (UTC)