Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polyommatus bellargus male, Aveyron, France - Diliff.jpg

File:Polyommatus bellargus male, Aveyron, France - Diliff.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2014 at 14:34:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --C messier (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support This confirms to me: If you have this lens, never leave the house without it!--Hubertl (talk) 19:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful colour -- Colin (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 23:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nikhil (talk) 03:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shallow DOF, f/8 on FF migth not be good idea. Crop could be biger. --Mile (talk) 10:52, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The DOF is 'good enough' by macro standards though, and all important details are sharp. Only the top edges of the wings are out of focus. It is very difficult to get a macro shot of a butterfly with its entirety in focus as you probably know. If you look at other FPs in this category, you will find that virtually all of them have similarly limited DOF, and many of them with significantly poorer sharpness and detail. Diliff (talk) 16:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magnificent. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 14:45, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This image was my main reason for purchasing my own macro lens. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:46, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support good DoF imo. --Kadellar (talk) 21:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support An unusual Diliff - no tone mapping, no stitching - but excellent in any way --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:02, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support One would wish for all the butterfly to be in focus, but I understand the limitations explained above. Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support J e e 06:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --fedaro (talk) 20:25, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 14:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera