Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rapids in mountain stream Brancla. 14-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg

File:Rapids in mountain stream Brancla. 14-09-2023. (actm.) 08.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2024 at 05:35:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
Info Mountain tour from Val Sinestra to Zuort. Rapids in mountain stream Brancla. Personally, I really like the layered colors of the wet boulders.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not find this exceptional, it is much below the bar of the images in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the most obviously exceptional photo but looking at for a bit I think it has a certain grandeur. I like the striations in the rocks and I think it conveys the power of the rapids. Cmao20 (talk) 18:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 couldn't have described it better. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tagoty. -- Karelj (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Many rocks and pebbles have lines or patterns, so this one doesn't seem fundamentally different to me from any other. Although pleasant to look at, these falls are not really breathtaking. The bottom crop is too tight. It looks like the stones in the foreground are both present and absent, like an indecision on whether to include or exclude them, and so they are just cut short. The little piece of branch at the upper left also looks weird in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Assuming you use a tripod which was essential, you are being let down by your camera, I'm afraid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]