Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red admiral butterfly (Vanessa atalanta) underside 3.jpg

File:Red admiral butterfly (Vanessa atalanta) underside 3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2016 at 09:53:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info created by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 09:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 09:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Washed out details, especially on the red parts of the wing. Postprocessing has gone too far or the lens are not up to task? --Ivar (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I do hope you are not being serious. Please search the Internet for other images of the ventral side of this butterfly. Charles (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment How about this one: --Ivar (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment I rest my case. The colours on mine, including the 'red', are stronger. Charles (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Red channel blown; I think. White to on the extreme end. J e e 17:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        Comment I concur, perhaps too much contrast was added in postprocessing? In that case it should be easy to fix. --Ivar (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Unsharp foreground is distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Lovely bokeh, and great work on the butterfly, but the flower in front is just complex enough to be too much of a distraction from it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 19:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]