Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sentry box shadow lamp Christiansborg Copenhagen Denmark.jpg

File:Sentry box shadow lamp Christiansborg Copenhagen Denmark.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2016 at 22:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 22:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support at Christiansborg palace, Copenhagen, Denmark. -- Jebulon (talk) 22:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Fun but doesn't really wow me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 05:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't help but like it! It is refreshingly unassuming and simple, but them again I like my photos not too complicated. w.carter-Talk 07:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I see the nice idea behind this but am not quite sold yet on it. Lighting a bit harsh, the whites nearly blown and poor in detail. Maybe gradient curves drawn too steep in postprocessing? --Kreuz schnabel 12:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me work --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An interesting image, but not striking enough to be an FP. Also, light seems a little harsh and that robs it of some color. Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment I don't understand these criticisms about a so-called "harsh light" or so. I did not (and I shall not) post process this winter evening nordic light, because it was so. There is no overexposure, and there is no loss of details, even in the whites. Of course opinions about striking or not are understandable for me (i.e. the famous "no wow" and variations around it), but I'm sorry to disagree about the light, which was excellent enough to provide a very detailed shadow... My only post-processing here was for the verticals (of the wall: the sentry box is leaning for real, which I found interesting). Thanks any way to all for comments and votes !--Jebulon (talk) 20:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice idea. --Ralf Roleček 06:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 06:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places