Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spot-billed duck at Expo’70 Commemorative Park in Osaka, November 2015 IV.jpg
File:Spot-billed duck at Expo’70 Commemorative Park in Osaka, November 2015 IV.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2016 at 21:06:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Support I know the duck is a bit dark and not enough sharp though :) -- Laitche (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Neutral Lovely background, however, Peer Laitche. I love your duck pictures like this one, but in this case the quality is not the best and if I had to choose between the beautiful water in the peak and waves or a focused duck, I would choose the focus. Your image is lovely it's only MHO --The Photographer 21:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment not sure why you would nominate an image you know is not sharp? Charles (talk) 22:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - I agree, it's not very sharp. Also, the red bokeh color in the water, probably a reflection of fall leaves, looks kind of bloody. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)- Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. --Karelj (talk) 22:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 23:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Unlike Ikan, I'm not bothered by the red reflections in the water ... it looks different, and I thought of red autumn leaves first. Like him, though, I think the duck's rear should be sharper. And I'll add to his oppose my own observation that the boundary of the front of the duck with the water looks a little too overprocessed. Might not have been intended, but it's there. Daniel Case (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment For me, the only issue is the underexposed rear end. Jee 03:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 06:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
