Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bullring Building.jpg

File:The Bullring Building.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2018 at 16:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Mdbeckwith - uploaded by Mdbeckwith nominated by -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Banned user. I reverted his upload. Yann (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GeXeS (talk) 17:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not finding the composition to work. My eye isn't led anywhere rewarding. The sky is oddly dark either from a graduated filter or polarising filter. The "sequinned dress" surface is interesting, but as a building, hmm, not so sure. -- Colin (talk) 20:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like looking at this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting abstraction, ~~but the dark angle of sky is really annoying,~~ because the geometrical structure with its irregular movement and subtle shades of contrast is great -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:47, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks quite unnatural (sky, contrast) --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Σπάρτακος (talk) 08:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support now -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC) -- Abstain per sock puppetry of the nominator -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Σπάρτακος please revert your change to this photo. It is not your photo and Mdbeckwith is a user here who can make changes to his image should he want to. Per COM:OVERWRITE you must upload your altered version to a new filename, and per the CC licence, you must indicate that this is altered from the original. Any new file would then have to be presented here as an alt. Please respect that this image is created/adjusted how the author wanted, and isn't uploaded here simply so that others can tweak it to suit their own tastes. -- Colin (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Similar case, for the record : Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Salford_Cathedral_Memorial_Chapel.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment Colin,Michael is a my friend and He writes me on my mail "Personally I am going to leave the photograph alone. You do have my permission to edit it if you want to. Also here is a link to the lossless TIFF if you want to edit that instead of JPEG. You can share the TIFF as well if you want.http://www.mediafire.com/file/o2bmtm64x0ljed1/160_Salford_Cathedral_Memorial_Chapel_TIFF.rar

Hope this helps. :)" If it is not enough I can always restore it--Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:42, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. But please mention "edited with permission" in future. -- Colin (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Colin, I'll do it. I'm sorry for my mistake, and I apologize --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:39, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There is a good way of photographing this building, but this photo is not it. The dark sky gradient is also too much and it can't be reverted right in jpeg, it has to be done from raw. --Cart (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak oppose per Cart. Also, I think the clouds screw things up—there are some blown (or almost blown) areas of the building near the one at the upper left corner, and generally they're a slight distraction the image doesn't need. Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]