Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tre Cime cows 4.jpg
File:Tre Cime cows 4.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 11:50:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna. I just love the facial impression of the cow, and the wagging tail. We have surprisingly few FPs of cattle. —kallerna (talk) 11:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Support —kallerna (talk) 11:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)- Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Agreed to our need of more FPs of cattle but this isn’t it IMHO. The frontal view is blunt and uninteresting, even menacing (though I’m not afraid of cows, see here or here), the animal is in the shade before a sunny background, and the background mountain conveys an unintentionally funny impression of elephant ears. --Kreuzschnabel 19:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)- Oppose in addition, we should not promote pictures of cows with cut off horn.--Christof46 (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Question - What is gained by opposing visual documentation of brutal practices? That seems to me to be an anti-Wikimedian attitude - opposing the spread of information rather than working to spread it far and wide. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow for me; sorry --A.Savin 00:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The reason why we have so few FPs of cattle is because they're just way too common. Looking at a cattle is not the same as looking at some endangered species like the Northern White Rhinoceros or the vaquita. Thus, for such a common species, a picture of its face is just not there in terms of wow. --Boothsift Is Here 08:05, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Moreover, the tail is blurred by the movement. — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination —kallerna (talk) 19:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
