Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villnöß Johanniskapelle mit Geisler.jpg

File:Villnöß Johanniskapelle mit Geisler.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2017 at 03:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 03:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 03:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I think the contrail seeming to slant up from the star on the bell tower is really the cherry on top of this picture. Just one thing, though: I think the highlights on the rock faces on the left are just a little too bright, so I'd encourage you to dial the brightness back just a little, but not much, so that the actual look or at least feel of the bright light is maintained. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support noting the slight overexposure. Unlike Ikan I don't think the rock faces are too bright, but there appears to be detail lost on the white facade (namely, compression of the RGB values within a narrow band around 240) - probably unrecoverable since you took the photo at 1/80s @ f/10, a stop above what I consider the "standard" daytime exposure (1/250s @ f/8). Fortunately, it's a flat surface that didn't have too much detail to begin with, so it's not too distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I would recommend to reduce the exposure a bit --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support where I'd like to be right now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Ikan Kekek: @King of Hearts: @Uoaei1: Thanks a lot for your support. I've rechecked exposure which I corrected by -0.3 and reduced highlights. Now I cannot find one pixel above the histogram, on the other side it was a very bright day ;-)--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
strong support Very good composition -- Thennicke (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per above.--Jebulon (talk) 08:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support but per Ikan and KoH, I think some exposure/highlights tweaking could be beneficial. Storkk (talk) 09:06, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --cart-Talk 09:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support PumpkinSky talk 01:16, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 09:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy