Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wat Si Saket in its paved courtyard Vientiane Laos.jpg

File:Wat Si Saket in its paved courtyard Vientiane Laos.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2019 at 03:28:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is a good photo. I'll think about it some more, but I'm not really feeling it as an FP, at least at the moment. I think if you could get this view during a sunrise or sunset with some amazing purple clouds, or maybe with crepuscular rays streaming from behind storm clouds, it would be spectacular and an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sunrise or sunset are not possible due to the incompatible opening hours. This is the oldest temple of Vientiane (capital of Laos), then quite an important heritage. I couldn't find a better picture of this wat on the web, but please give a link if I'm wrong -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I note this. Best in scope is more of a Valued Image argument, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Like I said above, I think this is a very good QI/VI, but it's not wowing me, I think mainly because of the light and clouds and secondly, the slightly random-looking crop of the palm tree, which is probably unavoidable and is probably the best crop you could make. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. --Milseburg (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It probably would be ideal in sunlight, but that might conversely make it hard to render the building's colors equally at this angle, and so I'm OK with this until and unless a really good one in sunlight shows up. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 22:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Bayoustarwatch (talk) 03:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support but you need at least 50 edits on commons before voting on FPC, please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]