Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Whistlejacket by George Stubbs edit.jpg/2

File:Whistlejacket by George Stubbs edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2014 at 09:15:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by George Stubbs - uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Its status on the wikipedias is supported by the strong EV. I don't think that should have the same impact here on Commons. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. However, I disagree with your opinion. We have many paintings, which have been given FP status on various wikipedias, elevated to FP status in commons. For example this pic got FP staus, this one and many more are there. IMHO, EV is an advantage for a pic in commons, besides technical quality. Nikhil (talk) 04:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not suggesting EV isn't a consideration on Commons. I am saying a good scan of a high EV paiting should not be the threshold for FP status on Commons. Commons is about the image... and without the written backstory in the WP article as to why this is such an important painting it becomes are rather unremarkable image to me. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 23:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]