Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wolkenmeer über dem Neuköllner Schifffahrtskanal von der Sonnenbrücke aus gesehen 05.jpg
File:Wolkenmeer über dem Neuköllner Schifffahrtskanal von der Sonnenbrücke aus gesehen 05.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2019 at 16:08:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info Clouds and the channel at noon seen from the bridge at the Sonnenallee opposite of the Estrel conference hotel created by C.Suthorn - uploaded by C.Suthorn - nominated by C.Suthorn -- C.Suthorn (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- C.Suthorn (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - I like the atmosphere and the brooding sky, but please fix the very extensive color noise on the sides. Also, I think this is a canal, not merely a channel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice moody sky, but otherwise the picture is quite dark and the composition does not fully work for me. Sorry. --Domob (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Nice mood and light, but that’s all I can say in favour of it. Verticals leaning in, image quality on foreground is way below FP threshold. The colour noise is already visible in the preview. You can’t expect a phone cam to deliver good quality in high-contrast situations like this. That would need HDR processing, and a good one. I won’t set an FPX though since others reckon the nice mood to excuse for poor quality. --Kreuzschnabel 17:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The foreground is very noisy and many details have been irrecoverably lost. I think the phone probably already did HDR automatically, but even with a 108 MP sensor, the quantum shot noise is a formidable physical limitation. The scene is pretty boring too. dllu (t,c) 07:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the technical quality is far too low.--Peulle (talk) 07:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |