Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:201 au 28 -07-2004 553.jpg

Image:201 au 28 -07-2004 553.jpg, not featured edit

Info created by Bananaflo - uploaded by Bananaflo - nominated by nico@nc 05:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)]][reply]
Support --nico@nc 05:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MPF 13:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 13:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gnangarra 03:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Huebi 08:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose cliff is cut at the left, bad lighting, not a very interesting subject. For me just a technically not too good postcard shot norro 12:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Definitely an interesting subject - it is the only photo we have of the endangered species Araucaria luxurians - MPF 23:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~ Support low res, Interesting, very particular vegetation --Luc Viatour 06:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A lot of featured pictures are 1024*768 (i.e: Image:Port_wine.jpg, Image:Kerala_India_tea_fields.jpg) and sometime smaller (i.e:Image:Karachi_-_Pakistan-market.jpg). I hope you'll reconsider your decision. -- nico@nc 10:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- De nombreuses images de qualité sont en 1024*768 (ex : Image:Port_wine.jpg, Image:Kerala_India_tea_fields.jpg) voire même plus petit (ex : Image:Karachi_-_Pakistan-market.jpg). J'espère donc que vous reconsidererez votre jugement. -- nico@nc 10:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Il est dommage de ne pas avoir une meilleure résolution, le plus intéressant dans cette image, c'est cette végétation particulière et elle n'est pas suffisamment détaillée. Si le nombre de votes n'est pas suffisant, je changerai mon vote! Par contre, par ma neutralité j'espère inciter l'auteur à faire un upload d'une version plus détaillée --Luc Viatour 14:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - I was running out of memory during the trip, and was forced to downgrade the rez setting of the camera.... I regret I couldn't post an higher quality shot !! Bananaflo 02:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - Ok, i change my vote --Luc Viatour 04:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Good News !! (or maybe not !?) Uploaded a new version of the picture, took with another camera of mine, in hirez, available here : Image:TurtlebayNC.jpg. Unfortunately, the weather was not as shiny as the previous verson. Thus, i uploaded the new picture as another file, so you can judge by yourself the pros/cons of changing the actual picture. Please give feedback on my Wikipedia user page =) Please remember to reconsider your vote if the new picture tricks you ! Bananaflo 10:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 16:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bananaflo 23:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I appreciate the rarity of the vegetation in question, but we're voting on the quality of the photographs here. The cut cliff on the left bothers me. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 23:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --- gildemax 12:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose mal cadré Gérard Janot 22:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad centring and poor emotional strength. El Comandante Hasta ∞ 10:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Boereck 16:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ßøuñçê Y2K 13:36, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Artefacto 14:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose => not featured Mglanznig 21:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]