Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Austria Bundesadler.svg

and   Support Schaengel89 11:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support a good example of heraldry. Scoo 14:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Get_It (Talk) 18:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent and out of the ordinary for featured pics. QuartierLatin1968 21:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support pfctdayelise 23:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shizhao 02:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support perfect norro 20:53, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't seem to have acceptable licensing. "Austrian Armed Forces (2001) Directorate of Press and Public Information/MoD. Publication of this picture except for commercial advertisement permitted." --SPUI 08:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. I asked the uploader for detailed information about that, but not yet got an answer. It's a little bit curious, because neither the german image description nor the (german) answer of the copyright-holder (Federal Ministry of Defence) tell anything about this non-commercial restriction. I suggest to vote, as if there weren't any problems with the license. If the image has to be deleted, your vote won't have any effect :) Kindly, norro 16:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. villy ♦✎ 17:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. To me it's just a coat of arms. Rex 01:41, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's not a barrier to make it featured! Schaengel89 18:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --fir0002 03:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support -- just a coat of arms and an excellent one at that, superbly done. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 13:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree --Braegel 19:25, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose renominate if license ok. We mustnt show people features pics that dont have free licenses even if temporarily. Justinc 12:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Roger McLassus 10:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

11 support, 3 Oppose => Featured--Shizhao 08:16, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]