Info created by (Digon3) - uploaded by Digon3 - nominated by Sunshade1
Support Very unique, great colours/angle, amazing pic. --Sunshade1 15:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Mjem 15:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Very interesting, amazing picture --Teh Dvd 16:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - combines nicely with the Winchester cathedral flags below. Nature's cathedral, so to say. :) DirkvdM 17:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Romary 21:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Good diagonal, good shadow area in foreground left, throws view to main subject, good texture. --Tomascastelazo 00:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - nice Andreas.Didion 06:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 16:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - MPF 01:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose too high color saturation and apart of that not a special composition. The trees disturb. --AngMoKio 14:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Comment I did not modify this picture. What you see is what I had seen.--Digon3 17:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - Nice. --Lhademmor 15:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose -- I think you have not taken full advantage of the great motives you can shoot at Bryce Canyon. I have taken nicer pictures back in the day with my analog camera - it rained that day... - Boereck 09:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose -- I wasn't there but have seen much more interesting pictures from that place. Perhaps I'm missing something to focus my eye in the foreground. Andreas Tille 09:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose composition (or rather hardly any composition) norro 21:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
10 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured Roger McLassus 20:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]