Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Butterfly Luc Viatour.JPG

Polyommatus icarus Belgium, featured edit

Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by Luc Viatour 19:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)]][reply]
Support --Luc Viatour 19:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wikimol 19:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC) not revolutionary or artsy, but well done and useful for wikimedia projects. (proper focus separates subject from background, natural background, centered composition is suitable for macro)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special, bad background Gérard Janot 20:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I can never resist such images--Tarawneh 21:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support although I'd like it more if it was rotated a little bit so the butterfly is horizontal and if it was cropped somewhat. Tbc 22:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Tbc a bit of a rotation and croping would be nice. I like the pic bcs this butterfly's colour is in such a contrast to the nature surounding it.--AngMoKio 23:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - MPF 23:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ~~not identified species, no support. "Butterfly" ...~~ Darkone 00:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- it is in the description "Butterfly Polyommatus icarus Belgium (natural reserve Furfooz)" --Luc Viatour 06:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Wikimol's comments. Very nice! --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 04:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice picture, but not exceptional --Joonasl 09:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --- gildemax 13:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jodelet 14:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Urban 15:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice resolution ;-) --Malene Thyssen 20:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo 17:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ACK Gérard Janot and Joonasl. Usability for wikipedia is not enough for beeing featured in my opinion norro 19:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lelote 16:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ggonnell 00:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --World Trekker 16:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --ßøuñçê Y2K 13:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice, but too ordinary. --Konstable 08:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I change my mind per Lycaon's comments.--Konstable 02:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC) Sorry, voting ended on 19 June 2006 (UTC), Oppose will be registered. Lycaon 08:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lerdsuwa 13:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Though one of the commonest Lycaenids, there are few or none pictures of this quality (and resolution) to be found on the internet. Lycaon 10:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 14:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 15   Support, 7   Oppose and 2   Neutral => featured. --Lycaon 08:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]