Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cheating.JPG

Image:Cheating.JPG, not featured

Info created by Hariadhi - uploaded by Hariadhi - nominated by Slaunger --Slaunger 21:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find this is a very valuable and well composed photo worthy the FP stamp. Also, it is a new topic here, which I find refreshing. I am eager to hear, if you, my dear reviewers agree. --Slaunger 21:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support What the gallery this image is displayed on needs is a photograph of human hands holding journals on an image scanner. Journals like Architecture and National Geographic Magazine and others. --carol 22:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Creative, though I don't support cheating. Calibas 23:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This kind of "stock photos" is really rare on Commons, but I'd still prefer it without the overexposure. --che 00:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am in the same state of mind as Che. --[[Anonymous Dissident]] 07:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, sorry, the overexposed part ruins the picture. -Aqwis 15:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for the same reason. --MichaelMaggs 17:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
CommentThank you for reviewing my photo. I did the overexposing on purpose to strengthen the emphasise. I found that the writing behind the hand really distracting eyes attention. So projecting another head lamp will blend it with the white background. But if you really insist, I won't mind. Hariadhi 11:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support As Calibas. --Karelj 23:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support the overexposure is nice in this case.. --Jeses 22:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Opposeoverexpose --Beyond silence 22:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 17:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 result: 6 supports, 5 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh 21:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]