Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Corgi01.jpg

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Lucas Löffler --Lucas Löffler 00:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lucas Löffler 00:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This type of objects—in casu furry animals—do not lean themselves to cutting out. The dog/background interface is very poor. Lycaon 08:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background is distracting Gordo 09:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose like Gordo Unsigned vote by User:Chmee2 - Alvesgaspar 10:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Dezidor 12:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'd expect better lighting, specially with a domestic animal. --Javier ME 20:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image quality was low even without the added background. Doodle-doo Ħ 21:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad cutout, nothing interesting --Leafnode 07:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer 18:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I'd expect better lighting, specially with a domestic animal. --Javier ME 20:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose background, nothing interesting --Leafnode 07:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose anyone who has ever tried to get a decent facial portrait of a dog will understand the difficulty of getting this shot right, such a pity the quality couldn't be better as I am strongly leaning towards support but it's just not up to par --Ben^hello! 12:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer 18:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]