Support. Looks good. But this might have profited even more from exposure blending than the Harriet River pic (long exposure to capture the light that's emmited from the house, shorter exposure to avoid blown-out highlights). --Dschwen06:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The highlights are ok, the shorter exosure I was referring to would just be shorter than the longer one for HDR, but just as long as the one in the original pic. Everyting clear? ;-) Dschwen05:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice job. There's quite a bit of lean to the left, but it is not too noticable. Overall lighting is far more important. -- Solipsist20:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Fir0002
Support. Looks good. But this might have profited even more from exposure blending than the Harriet River pic (long exposure to capture the light that's emmited from the house, shorter exposure to avoid blown-out highlights). --Dschwen 06:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Oppose What's so special about this? --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 03:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
