Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Current River, Missouri, panorama.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2009 at 00:12:31

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question Nikon D300. What happened to the other 83% of the picture? Cropped or downsampled? Lycaon (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info It's a detail of one large image. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I think it's a very less-quality image.--Musia! (talk) 19:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info It is wrong to say: "it's a very less-quality image". This image has in the horizontal and the vertical resolution 400 dpi and it has 2,09 MB. You need for a featured picture 2 MB and for an excellent print 300 dpi. But this image has 400 dpi!--Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 21:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Oppose, the dark trees in the foreground ruin the picture. --Aqwis (talk) 10:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info The dark tree divides the image and separate it into two different images. This is my graphical reason. You would not see two different images, if the tree would be green.--Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition, Michael Gäbler wrote it good. --Karel (talk) 21:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 10:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]